-WindYoshi- said:AWESOME- Mirror
- Bugsy
- Plasma-wisp
- ice and fire guy combo!
Bozon:3) Super Smash Bros. Brawl
Genre: Fighter
Developer: Nintendo
Publisher: Nintendo
Why?: Like everyone else, I'm disappointed that Brawl was a complete no-show at E3 2007, but that hasn't changed the fact that I still very much want and, indeed, must own this hugely hyped sequel. With more characters and stages than ever before, four different control schemes, new specials, and noticeably improved graphics to boot, Brawl has everything going for it. Plus, although Nintendo still isn't talking about it, this is sure to be the Wii game that really pushes the Wi-Fi Connection.
4) Super Smash Bros. Brawl
Genre: Fighter
Developer: Nintendo
Publisher: Nintendo
Why?: So each of the "Big 3" are actually making it out this year, eh Nintendo? If that's indeed true - and the company insists it is time and time again - I've got plenty of gaming to do. Smash Bros. Brawl would be my #1 game any other year, as it's exactly what I look for in my gaming experience. Take a highly competitive game, put it online, and throw in nearly every top-tier mascot in the world. How can you not get psyched about this game? The only reason this killer title is this far down on my list is because it's more of the same, and even though that "same" is still a AAA piece of gaming I've got no problem making room for future greats by dropping this down a bit. After all, everyone's buying this one anyways, right?
6) Manhunt 2
Genre: Action
Developer: Rockstar Toronto / London
Publisher: Rockstar
Why?: I've got faith in Rockstar on this one. Not that Manhunt 2 will rock socks - I already know it does - but that Manhunt will make it out this year. Combining the absolutely brutal world of Manhunt with the equally disturbing motion capability of the Wii-mote, Manhunt 2 has already got me addicted after just one day with the preview build. Yes it's violent, no it isn't intended for kids, but it's still one hell of a game, and it deserves its time in the shine. If it doesn't make it, consider this slot reserved for Rockstar Table Tennis and/or Bully. I own both those games on their respective starter platforms, and they deserve every penny as well. Rockstar, where's my WiiTA?
dyls said:The IGN boys seem faily confident that Brawl will be online. From their "Top 10 Most Anticipated Games of 2007" list-
dyls said:
Linkzg said:I still believe that Brawl wont be online and unless Halo DS comes out, IGNs word is useless.
unless its a big surprise later on that its online, it doesnt make sense that they talk about online games for the Wii at E3 and not mention Smash, yet they mention Mario Kart is online.
AlternativeUlster said:Bully has been confirmed for a while now. So has Table Tennis. All this stuff has been discussed like almost forever ago. I feel like I accidentally stepped back in time 3 weeks ago.
Why is it that every single post of yours in this thread is incredibly, EPICALLY retarded?MasterMFauli said:I say it again:
If Nintendo doesnt release a wireless headset at least together with SSBB and makes use of it in SSBB, they can forget about an online-mode.
Online-gaming in a game like SSBB without voices is like offline-gaming, just with, depending, stronger CPU-opponents.
MasterMFauli said:I say it again:
If Nintendo doesnt release a wireless headset at least together with SSBB and makes use of it in SSBB, they can forget about an online-mode.
Online-gaming in a game like SSBB without voices is like offline-gaming, just with, depending, stronger CPU-opponents.
I think voice would be pretty cool, but I don't expect it. But it's just absurd to think the only difference between playing a human and a cpu is the voice of the player.Slurpy said:No thanks, I'd rather not have the ability to hear stupid shit.
usea said:Why is it that every single post of yours in this thread is incredibly, EPICALLY retarded?
For real. Just go through them. It's sad.
usea said:Why is it that every single post of yours in this thread is incredibly, EPICALLY retarded?
For real. Just go through them. It's sad.
Got social?Slurpy said:No thanks, I'd rather not have the ability to hear stupid shit.
I actually edited in "in this thread" because to be fair, I haven't read his posts elsewhere. I should have qualified further, because after examination they're not ALL epically retarded. Just a large number of them.rakka said:And not just in this thread either.
I called your posts retarded, not you. I'm not saying it's not true, I'd just like to be understood correctly.MasterMFauli said:Thanks for calling me retarded...
It´s not retarded. What´s the difference in gameplay when you cant hear your opponent? It´s no different to playing the game offline. Please, Nintendo, include difficulty-levels up to 20 instead of 9, then you would see that there´s no difference.
Im participating in the MarioStrikers Worldcup here on neogaf, but it would be so much more fun if you could talk while playing.
Thank God other people notice this. I thought I was just going crazy.usea said:Why is it that every single post of yours in this thread is incredibly, EPICALLY retarded?
For real. Just go through them. It's sad.
MasterMFauli said:If there´s no communication i can play offline, as well.
Playing online without voice-chat is like playing offline with, depending on the opponent, a stronger CPU. I cant understand how you dont get that.
Try to imagine not having a chatroom or board to talk with your online-opponent. You just connect to an opponent, the game starts just like it does in an online-game, game takes place, is finished, battle-statistics are shown, over and out.
I dont need online-gaming for that kind of experience.
MasterMFauli said:If there´s no communication i can play offline, as well.
Playing online without voice-chat is like playing offline with, depending on the opponent, a stronger CPU. I cant understand how you dont get that.
Try to imagine not having a chatroom or board to talk with your online-opponent. You just connect to an opponent, the game starts just like it does in an online-game, game takes place, is finished, battle-statistics are shown, over and out.
I dont need online-gaming for that kind of experience.
Branduil said:http://i17.tinypic.com/52oep8m.gif[IMG][/QUOTE]
I dunno why but I immediately thought of this: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTB2iogcmsI[/url] :lol
WildArms said:Even if the computer is put on level 100, it's not the difficulty that matters. Computers NEVER have as much variety as a human player. This is NEVER possible. A human will never have the exact match twice, whereas a computer can.
Have you ever played Melee? Remember when the computers always went for a PokeBall, or when you got a star, how they always just ran to the other side of a screen. I don't know why I'm bothering with this explanation anyway. Are you 5 years old?
Oh but I'm not denying that voice chat is better than no voice chat, but that isn't what you are saying though is it.
MasterMFauli said:I played SSB64 and melee to death, no need for explanation.
Point is: A CPU at level "100" wouldnt behave that stupid.
And as it seems we cannot get a consense here, at least try to understand that: the point of multiplayer-gaming is, to me, to reach a certain atmosphere singleplayer-games cannot reach. Communicating with my fellow players is a big part of this atmosphere. That´s why SSBB online wouldnt be as important to me as it would be if it had voice-chat. Ok?
WildArms said:Even if the computer is put on level 100, it's not the difficulty that matters. Computers NEVER have as much variety as a human player. This is NEVER possible. A human will never have the exact match twice, whereas a computer can.
MasterMFauli said:Point is: A CPU at level "100" wouldnt behave that stupid.
Slavik81 said:Computers are predictable and can be manipulated with ease. They do not learn from their mistakes, so you can exploit them to no end.
But surely you concede that Strikers is a richer, more fulfilling experience because of its online-multiplayer, even though it has no voice chat?MasterMFauli said:If there´s no communication i can play offline, as well.
Playing online without voice-chat is like playing offline with, depending on the opponent, a stronger CPU. I cant understand how you dont get that.
Try to imagine not having a chatroom or board to talk with your online-opponent. You just connect to an opponent, the game starts just like it does in an online-game, game takes place, is finished, battle-statistics are shown, over and out.
I dont need online-gaming for that kind of experience.
I hate when people say this crap. You don't have to listen to people like that. Take off the damn headset. And you all act like that's all the talk on Live sounds like when really it isn't and you meet straight people like you and I all the time.JohnTinker said:Those that are pining for in-game voice chat for this game obviously have not spent enough time listening to the enlightened conversation that takes place over Xbox Live.
If there's anything I want to avoid, its being called eight different racial slurs and having my sexuality questioned within a span of the same 5 words, all throughout the duration of an entire match.
My younger brother and sister will be playing this alongside me later this year, and forcing them to listen to a string of vulgarities and unnecessary profanity while playing online is not my interpretation of a good time.
Not a reason not to have it since you might get offended easily.JohnTinker said:If I'm supposed to take off the headset what good does voice chat do for me
ant1532 said:I hate when people say this crap. You don't have to listen to people like that. Take off the damn headset. And you all act like that's all the talk on Live sounds like when really it isn't and you meet straight people like you and I all the time.
Exactly.traveler said:Exactly. The quotient of jackass to considerate player is HIGHLY exagerrated. I hardly ever set up matchmaking with friends on Live and almost always go it alone and, you know what, 3/4 of the people I meet are players just like myself, looking to have a good time. Yes, there are idiots out there, but there are far more people worth playing with.
:lolJohn Harker said:I want ant to be my mentor in Brawl online, and he can train me online and we can communicate via the Nintendo wireless blue tooth headset.
This, of course, is merely fantasy land right now.