squatingyeti
non-sanctioned troll
You're talking about Kellar, right? I think Kellar is stating to the court that SCEA made a statement in the evidence that there was a purchase or transaction associated with the blickmaniac account, but did not include it in that piece of evidence. Furthermore, they did not provide that information (the purchase or transaction information) to Kellar. It seems Kellar is pointing out that SCEA is insinuating said purchase or transaction information must be tied to Hotz, but not providing it.Zoe said:The evidence is in Law Decl A.
Why didn't they file proof of them asking for additional information?
If you read the actual PDF, Kellar believes SCEA has insinuated several things to prejudice the court, but either not proven them, or when they do provide the evidence (IP for Geo1Hotz) it doesn't match their insinuation or outright claim. He is also pointing out SCEA's (in his mind) continued efforts to ignore procedure. This being another instance of not turning over something they must to the defense or delaying doing such (like the SCEA SCEI agreements) until the defense does not have reasonable time to review it.
Which would then mean there should be no difference between copies the court receives and copies the defense receives. There must be a noticeable difference as Kellar has asked the court to compare his copies with theirs.It looks like they converted that document to grayscale when printing it to PDF--that could easily be a mistake just as easily as it could be a stalling tactic. That said, shading such as that shouldn't have prevented any decent OCR client from parsing it. Additionally, the document is still completely legible.
The court did order that they be provided in TIFF. (Let me track that down...LOL search a legal document for TIFF )Regarding TIFF vs PDF, because TIFF is a highly manipulative format, I can understand a preference for handing over documents (particularly sealed documents) as PDF. Unless they've been legally instructed to do so (and the lawyers don't cite anything on that), then providing documents in that format would just be a courtesy.
It is likely he asked the court to instruct they be in TIFF format so he could better use OCR.Kellar said:In contrast, SCEA's document production failed to comply with the instructions to produce TIFF files