Dark Octave said:You can have a great fight for a while, but in the end, you really can't expect to go against a company as big as MS and win.
Yeah, not like Apple or Nintendo have beaten them in certain fields.
Dark Octave said:You can have a great fight for a while, but in the end, you really can't expect to go against a company as big as MS and win.
stuminus3 said:At this point it's disappointing when a third party game hits the HD systems and it's not multiplatform. Actually not disappointing. It's nonsensical.
Pot. Kettle. Black.
What's it like to have a corporate exec able to play you like a flute?Rapping Granny said:MS buying their way to the top as usual.
itxaka said:It sure does.
Now Sony, see what happens? You gotta lick third party asses to get good things sometimes. As the curent market it, did you really expected SE to go exclusive for a title that is costing them a lot of money? Selling software is what drives them, or some millions under the table and the market has shown that the 360 sells software really well, so this was a logical business decision.
Gears?
mightynine said:Of what? This is their latest attempt to try and move some consoles in Japan.
Sorry, it's certainly not a game changer, for the same reason MGS4 wasn't - the people who will buy this game already have whatever console they will buy it on.
Monopolies are bad.h3ro said:ONE CONSOLE FUTURE
Believe...
le.phat said:when all is said and done i'm really happy sony has chosen to invest its dollars in internal development studios. This way they're breeding platform exclusive specialists, able to tap into ps3's rescources, and build an developerfriendly independent enviroment where technology, creativity and talent can be reallocated, applied and bred into new franchises. I think we can already see the payoff with the second flood of sony titles on display at E3, and things are only getting better.
You had a crappy Metal Gear port.gregor7777 said:We did OK in the NES days. There was no real competition.
And the nice thing was I didn't miss out on any games. I got my Metal gear, my Final Fantasy, my Metroid and Mario Brothers all on the same system.
Seems you missed the memo.mightynine said:Of what? This is their latest attempt to try and move some consoles in Japan.
itxaka said:It sure does.
Now Sony, see what happens? You gotta lick third party asses to get good things sometimes. As the curent market it, did you really expected SE to go exclusive for a title that is costing them a lot of money? Selling software is what drives them, or some millions under the table and the market has shown that the 360 sells software really well, so this was a logical business decision.
"I think software companies look and say 'there's no check big enough for us to do exclusive development' ...I think it's going to be harder and harder to have third-party exclusives as we move forward."
Die Squirrel Die said:You don't go from building your platform largely on third party franchises, to almost completely switching away from pursuing third parties overnight, particularly when your closest competition is aggressively dealmaking with third parties and your other competitor basically rules first party development and has for over 25 years.
Sony bought the stocks to save Squaresoft from being completely destroyed.behem0th x said:So when Sony buys in near 20% stock in Square to keep FF exclusive, thats fine... it's cool if Nintendo throws out money with their qfund stuff to get some FF love and thats exceptable.. but if MS dares throw a dollar at them... complete asshats for it?
/mind explode.
Ha, ha! No.Quixzlizx said:Yeah, Nintendo is just about finished.
Genius :lolHellraizer said:
puebla said:wow, was Sony really caught offguard by this announcement? seems like it.
J-Rzez said:I'd much rather see Sony dumping the money into 1st party myself. You can distinctly tell that is the way to go by the more often than not higher quality of game. Unfortunately for MS, they're trying to cash in on casuals and control Sony at the same time, but they're missing the point here. It's not that "Omg, 360 has the FF now" which is going to pull in the majority of new sales, it's "What unique games does the 360 have from the PS3, well they have Gears, and Fable, and Alan Wake, but it looks like the PS3 has more exclusives". While they're fighting/spending to say me too, their competitor is putting out more unique reasons to own their system anymore, and they can't take first party titles away. And it's not just more unique titles, it's quality with those titles as well, which the Sony stables have.
Die Squirrel Die said:I think some people have touched on this already, but while in theory that's all well and good, so far, very little of Sony's refocusing on internal development has translated into large scale sales successes, for both hardware and software alike.
Developer in Training said:Sony bought the stocks to save Squaresoft from being completely destroyed.
I find that completely honourable.
Developer in Training said:You had a crappy Metal Gear port.
I was playing on the PC Engine where the great games were at.
Elios83 said:Gears is a second party game, like Resistance not a third party exclusive.
Microsoft publishes Gears..?
J-Rzez said:I'd much rather see Sony dumping the money into 1st party myself. You can distinctly tell that is the way to go by the more often than not higher quality of game. Unfortunately for MS, they're trying to cash in on casuals and control Sony at the same time, but they're missing the point here. It's not that "Omg, 360 has the FF now" which is going to pull in the majority of new sales, it's "What unique games does the 360 have from the PS3, well they have Gears, and Fable, and Alan Wake, but it looks like the PS3 has more exclusives". While they're fighting/spending to say me too, their competitor is putting out more unique reasons to own their system anymore, and they can't take first party titles away. And it's not just more unique titles, it's quality with those titles as well, which the Sony stables have.
What are you talking about? Three days ago a large percentage of the people who are going to buy this game didn't have the console they would have bought it on.mightynine said:Sorry, it's certainly not a game changer, for the same reason MGS4 wasn't - the people who will buy this game already have whatever console they will buy it on.
Insomniac is an independent company. They could make games for Microsoft of Nintendo if they so chose.itxaka said:I mean, Insomniac is part of Sony(is it?)
jjasper said:He is right too and Sony is smart to try and build up their first party library. The problem is lack of variety and still not having a system seller out yet in the first party line up.
Yeah, like Lair and Heavenly Sword.le.phat said:when all is said and done i'm really happy sony has chosen to invest its dollars in internal development studios. This way they're breeding platform exclusive specialists, able to tap into ps3's rescources, and build an developerfriendly independent enviroment where technology, creativity and talent can be reallocated, applied and bred into new franchises. I think we can already see the payoff with the second flood of sony titles on display at E3, and things are only getting better.
itxaka said:What makes it 2d party? I mean, Insomniac is part of Sony(is it?) and only makes games for them, Epic already released UT3 timed exclusive for Sony. They are a third party.
Rapping Granny said:MS buying their way to the top as usual.
Yep. And remember Sony's money isn't an endless pit like Microsoft'sBruceWayneIII said:Still has it, right? It's not like MS can say: now look what WE got!?
It's perfectly understandable from SE' side and SONY knows that. Personally, as a gamer, I would rather have SONY investing their money on new ip for me to enjoy - instead of spending it trying to keep MS out.
:lol :lol :lolDark Octave said:You can have a great fight for a while, but in the end, you really can't expect to go against a company as big as MS and win.
AAK said:Things would be different if Sony used the money to make Lair to buy some nice exclusives.
But the main thing is the insult to the PS3. FFXIII was supposed to be THE game only possible on 360. With SE now showing that it will be possible on 360 with no differences only gives the impression that the PS3 isn't the all powerful game machine the public originally perceived.
Nah microsoft does Microsoft business. It's completely different to the way other companies work. Once they got to the top they did everything to stay there, many of it included non-friendly-business work. Call it business? Nah. Call it Microsoft.PIMPBYBLUD said:It's called doing business.
BruceWayneIII said:Just a note, but I am still pretty impressed by how far they have come, if you look at it from my perspective: bought a PS3 PAL launch console 15 months ago. 15 months... That's like yesterday, if you know what I mean.
You know except for the fucking huge talent pool that sony signs cheques on.crowphoenix said:I would think it would be a good idea to curry favor from third parties.
It also looks like we're moving towards a one-experience future. We'll have multiple consoles, but they'll all act basically the same.
Vinci said:Um ... I think you missed the point. Granny said Microsoft was buying its way to the top, but it's not on the top of anything in this industry.
Well, except online play. And Netflix.