• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Sony's Tretton: 'Disappointed' In Multiplatform FFXIII Through MS' 'Currying Favor'

krzyspc

Banned
Dark Octave said:
You can have a great fight for a while, but in the end, you really can't expect to go against a company as big as MS and win.

Yeah, not like Apple or Nintendo have beaten them in certain fields.
 

Vinci

Danish
stuminus3 said:
At this point it's disappointing when a third party game hits the HD systems and it's not multiplatform. Actually not disappointing. It's nonsensical.

Speaking of that, it's a bit odd that MGS4 isn't appearing on the 360. 'Odd' as in my earlier comment:

Pot. Kettle. Black.
 

Elios83

Member
itxaka said:
It sure does.

Now Sony, see what happens? You gotta lick third party asses to get good things sometimes. As the curent market it, did you really expected SE to go exclusive for a title that is costing them a lot of money? Selling software is what drives them, or some millions under the table and the market has shown that the 360 sells software really well, so this was a logical business decision.




Gears?


Gears is a second party game, like Resistance not a third party exclusive.


BTW Tretton also put the blame on Kutaragi for past mistakes :lol :lol

And he basically confirmed that PSP with hard drive is going to happen in the future and they're deciding if selling it in parallel with the current model or like an evolution.
 

Squash

Member
mightynine said:
Of what? This is their latest attempt to try and move some consoles in Japan.

Sorry, it's certainly not a game changer, for the same reason MGS4 wasn't - the people who will buy this game already have whatever console they will buy it on.

But 360 won't be getting this in Japan?
 

Luckyman

Banned
http://www.edge-online.com/news/tretton-opens-up

During the presentation, attended by Edge, Tretton admitted that Sony “has had a weakness” in how the company organized its different hardware and software engineers.

“We have some great engineers working on software and hardware. But we’ve had situations in the past where the hardware guys just presented their work to the software guys, and where the two just didn’t meet up enough. It’s been a learning curve.”

He said that this problem had been identified prior to PS3’s development, but that the technical advances of PS3 out-paced improved internal communications.

Tretton also said that Sony “showed a lot of naivete” when the company began work on Home, and when it showed the product prematurely to the media.

He added that the internal development of Home had been hampered by a lack of understanding of what exactly the company was developing, “We had to figure out that this wasn’t just a piece of software, and not just a service, but something that needed a specific team, including hardware expertise,” he said.

He added that he would not release Home until it was completely ready.

Partly, he said, the problems of the past were the cost of doing business with someone as driven as former PlayStation supremo Ken Kutaragi. “There was just no stopping him,” Tretton said. “When he wanted something to happen, it happened. It’s very exciting but it did leave us open and vulnerable to criticism.”


Tretton talked plenty about the positives of PlayStation 3, including the company’s video download system, which went live this week. He was unapologetic, for example, about the lack of backwards compatibility hardware in PS3, explaining the company’s financial rationale behind that decision.

He was also scathing about Microsoft and Nintendo’s avatar-based online communities. “What they’re doing is very simplified. It might be enough for some people, but we won’t reverse our approach.” He said that Microsoft's announcements this week offered "npothoing we didn't already knoew about".

On the appearance of Final Fantrasy XIII on Xbox 360, he admitted to "feeling some disappointment" but added that he "wasn't at all surprised" explaining that third-party exclusives are a rarity now "except in Japan where Xbox 360 has no user base to speak of." He reminded the media that FFXIII is still a PS3 exclusive in Japan.

He was also open about his own position, saying that it often affected him personally to see some of the criticism he, and Sony, faces in the press, even on blogs and forums. “I’m not going to pretend I don’t read this stuff, or that it doesn’t affect me. It does,” he said.

Asked about a hard-drive version of PSP, he said it was something he had considered, but was still working on whether or not it would release alongside the current model “or whether it might be an evolution”. He added that he had nothing “to pull out of my back pocket right now” but indicated that it would be a likely release in the future.
 

drohne

hyperbolically metafictive
wow, a clever castle vidcons -- that's more surprising than the actual ff13 announcement
 
le.phat said:
when all is said and done i'm really happy sony has chosen to invest its dollars in internal development studios. This way they're breeding platform exclusive specialists, able to tap into ps3's rescources, and build an developerfriendly independent enviroment where technology, creativity and talent can be reallocated, applied and bred into new franchises. I think we can already see the payoff with the second flood of sony titles on display at E3, and things are only getting better.

I think some people have touched on this already, but while in theory that's all well and good, so far, very little of Sony's refocusing on internal development has translated into large scale sales successes, for both hardware and software alike.

You don't go from building your platform largely on third party franchises, to almost completely switching away from pursuing third parties overnight, particularly when your closest competition is aggressively dealmaking with third parties.
 
gregor7777 said:
We did OK in the NES days. There was no real competition.

And the nice thing was I didn't miss out on any games. I got my Metal gear, my Final Fantasy, my Metroid and Mario Brothers all on the same system.
You had a crappy Metal Gear port.

I was playing on the PC Engine where the great games were at.
 

J-Rzez

Member
I'd much rather see Sony dumping the money into 1st party myself. You can distinctly tell that is the way to go by the more often than not higher quality of game. Unfortunately for MS, they're trying to cash in on casuals and control Sony at the same time, but they're missing the point here. It's not that "Omg, 360 has the FF now" which is going to pull in the majority of new sales, it's "What unique games does the 360 have from the PS3, well they have Gears, and Fable, and Alan Wake, but it looks like the PS3 has more exclusives". While they're fighting/spending to say me too, their competitor is putting out more unique reasons to own their system anymore, and they can't take first party titles away. And it's not just more unique titles, it's quality with those titles as well, which the Sony stables have.
 
So when Sony buys in near 20% stock in Square to keep FF exclusive, thats fine... it's cool if Nintendo throws out money with their qfund stuff to get some FF love and thats exceptable.. but if MS dares throw a dollar at them... complete asshats for it?

/mind explode.
 
itxaka said:
It sure does.

Now Sony, see what happens? You gotta lick third party asses to get good things sometimes. As the curent market it, did you really expected SE to go exclusive for a title that is costing them a lot of money? Selling software is what drives them, or some millions under the table and the market has shown that the 360 sells software really well, so this was a logical business decision.

Still has it, right? It's not like MS can say: now look what WE got!?

It's perfectly understandable from SE' side and SONY knows that. Personally, as a gamer, I would rather have SONY investing their money on new ip for me to enjoy - instead of spending it trying to keep MS out.
 

Niks

Member
"I think software companies look and say 'there's no check big enough for us to do exclusive development' ...I think it's going to be harder and harder to have third-party exclusives as we move forward."

Its a first-party battle from here on out it seems.
 

hc2

Junior Member
Curry is an East Indian spice so it must have been the Indians who are undermining Sony. I guess no more PS3's in Bombay?
Sounds like PR spin is just digging a rut, no traction on that spin.
 

kevm3

Member
Sony should, by no means, alienate third parties, but this just goes to show the volatile nature of 3rd party exclusivity this generation. It just becomes a huge drain on cash having to pay a huge premium just to 'not have the game on the other system.' That money will be much better spent on first party where you don't have to worry about them effortlessly jumping ship due to financial incentives or business conditions.

It's just up to Sony to put together teams that can offer titles that are competitive in genres such as rpgs however.
 

Vinci

Danish
Die Squirrel Die said:
You don't go from building your platform largely on third party franchises, to almost completely switching away from pursuing third parties overnight, particularly when your closest competition is aggressively dealmaking with third parties and your other competitor basically rules first party development and has for over 25 years.

Fix'd. Just because making things sound more bleak now will make Sony's rise to future glory all the more heroic.
 
behem0th x said:
So when Sony buys in near 20% stock in Square to keep FF exclusive, thats fine... it's cool if Nintendo throws out money with their qfund stuff to get some FF love and thats exceptable.. but if MS dares throw a dollar at them... complete asshats for it?

/mind explode.
Sony bought the stocks to save Squaresoft from being completely destroyed.

I find that completely honourable.
 
Quixzlizx said:
Yeah, Nintendo is just about finished.
Ha, ha! No.

You fail to realize that MS and Nintendo aren't even really in the same market, nor are they going after the same consumer. MS is getting more and more aggressive with the whole family thing, so once the new Xbox releases with Nintendo's strategy and launch with an "easy to use" controller of their own, it'll be a wrap. Not an Xbot in the slightest. I just understand that M$ will stop at nothing to become #1 in every field they enter.

Like I said, you can have a great battle, but IN THE END...
 

Dyno

Member
Being 'disappointed' is kind of a dickheaded way to look at it. More people will be playing FF13 and more money will be spent on the gaming industry in general. It's still an emergent media form. The more exposure there is, the better.

I understand that an exclusive would have meant more money to Sony. They probably held some vain belief that it would move more units. But to want to deny people an experience because they didn't by your machine is just too corporate an attitude.

Seriously, there are too many fucking old people in the video game industry, especially at the console level. No wonder the business strategies are all over the fucking place.
 
Hellraizer said:
cv0045.jpg
Genius :lol
 

evilone

EA Employee
puebla said:
wow, was Sony really caught offguard by this announcement? seems like it.

Answer to your question = No. Anyone who thinks Sony had no knowledge of this is silly. Don't forget that Sony has a huge amount of shares with SE and I am sure this process was informed to the share holders of SE.
 

AAK

Member
Things would be different if Sony used the money to make Lair to buy some nice exclusives.

But the main thing is the insult to the PS3. FFXIII was supposed to be THE game only possible on 360. With SE now showing that it will be possible on 360 with no differences only gives the impression that the PS3 isn't the all powerful game machine the public originally perceived.
 
J-Rzez said:
I'd much rather see Sony dumping the money into 1st party myself. You can distinctly tell that is the way to go by the more often than not higher quality of game. Unfortunately for MS, they're trying to cash in on casuals and control Sony at the same time, but they're missing the point here. It's not that "Omg, 360 has the FF now" which is going to pull in the majority of new sales, it's "What unique games does the 360 have from the PS3, well they have Gears, and Fable, and Alan Wake, but it looks like the PS3 has more exclusives". While they're fighting/spending to say me too, their competitor is putting out more unique reasons to own their system anymore, and they can't take first party titles away. And it's not just more unique titles, it's quality with those titles as well, which the Sony stables have.


This is true but they built the ability this ge to do that on the strength of all those things that Microsoft is trying to do now. You can focus on internal dev teams and building interesting new IP's when your money has already been made on the strength of being the market leader in Madden's and FF's and whatnot.
 
Die Squirrel Die said:
I think some people have touched on this already, but while in theory that's all well and good, so far, very little of Sony's refocusing on internal development has translated into large scale sales successes, for both hardware and software alike.

Just a note, but I am still pretty impressed by how far they have come, if you look at it from my perspective: bought a PS3 PAL launch console 15 months ago. 15 months... That's like yesterday, if you know what I mean.
 
Developer in Training said:
Sony bought the stocks to save Squaresoft from being completely destroyed.

I find that completely honourable.

Find it however you like, it was a business decision.

Developer in Training said:
You had a crappy Metal Gear port.

I was playing on the PC Engine where the great games were at.

Lies. it was a beautiful port, into which I sunk many wasted hours of my childhood.
 

itxaka

Defeatist
Elios83 said:
Gears is a second party game, like Resistance not a third party exclusive.

I edited in gears after reading that because it came to my mind.

What makes it 2d party? I mean, Insomniac is part of Sony(is it?) and only makes games for them, Epic already released UT3 timed exclusive for Sony. They are a third party.

Microsoft publishes Gears..?

That is what I mean, is from a third party, but they struck a deal to have it on 360 exclusive with publishing and such. Like NG2.

They just have to talk with 3th parties to make sure they got exclusives too, even timed. It´s not like they say, increasingly difficult. They just have to accept that sometimes you have to moneyhat your way to exclusives, if not MS are gonna get all they can. They gotta play with the same guns.
 

soldat7

Member
J-Rzez said:
I'd much rather see Sony dumping the money into 1st party myself. You can distinctly tell that is the way to go by the more often than not higher quality of game. Unfortunately for MS, they're trying to cash in on casuals and control Sony at the same time, but they're missing the point here. It's not that "Omg, 360 has the FF now" which is going to pull in the majority of new sales, it's "What unique games does the 360 have from the PS3, well they have Gears, and Fable, and Alan Wake, but it looks like the PS3 has more exclusives". While they're fighting/spending to say me too, their competitor is putting out more unique reasons to own their system anymore, and they can't take first party titles away. And it's not just more unique titles, it's quality with those titles as well, which the Sony stables have.


To say that there are fewer 'unique' titles or fewer 'quality' titles on the 360 is less than accurate.
 
mightynine said:
Sorry, it's certainly not a game changer, for the same reason MGS4 wasn't - the people who will buy this game already have whatever console they will buy it on.
What are you talking about? Three days ago a large percentage of the people who are going to buy this game didn't have the console they would have bought it on.
 

DECK'ARD

The Amiga Brotherhood
jjasper said:
He is right too and Sony is smart to try and build up their first party library. The problem is lack of variety and still not having a system seller out yet in the first party line up.

Erm, Gran Turismo is one of the strongest system-sellers you can have.

But yeah, they do struggle to produce the kliller-apps internally. I don't evem see Little Big Planet reaching that satus with the general public no matter how good it is.

Sony tend to produce stuff that's either too generic to stand out much, or too far to the other extreme with titles that are well loved but a bit niche.
 
le.phat said:
when all is said and done i'm really happy sony has chosen to invest its dollars in internal development studios. This way they're breeding platform exclusive specialists, able to tap into ps3's rescources, and build an developerfriendly independent enviroment where technology, creativity and talent can be reallocated, applied and bred into new franchises. I think we can already see the payoff with the second flood of sony titles on display at E3, and things are only getting better.
Yeah, like Lair and Heavenly Sword.
There's no way a single company can offset the exclusives from all other companies Playstation enjoyed until now.
 

jjasper

Member
itxaka said:
What makes it 2d party? I mean, Insomniac is part of Sony(is it?) and only makes games for them, Epic already released UT3 timed exclusive for Sony. They are a third party.

Insomniac is independent of Sony.
 

deepbrown

Member
BruceWayneIII said:
Still has it, right? It's not like MS can say: now look what WE got!?

It's perfectly understandable from SE' side and SONY knows that. Personally, as a gamer, I would rather have SONY investing their money on new ip for me to enjoy - instead of spending it trying to keep MS out.
Yep. And remember Sony's money isn't an endless pit like Microsoft's
 

BobsRevenge

I do not avoid women, GAF, but I do deny them my essence.
Dark Octave said:
You can have a great fight for a while, but in the end, you really can't expect to go against a company as big as MS and win.
:lol :lol :lol

Sony is twice as big as MS fyi. They own one of the largest movie studios and one of the largest music studios. They own a huge electronics empire. And they have a game division.

Microsoft makes software, the 360, the Zune, and has less than half as many employees.
 

LiK

Member
he was obviously disappointed. it was painful to watch. but hey, Square wanted more sales and going multiplatform was the obvious choice for them.
 

DECK'ARD

The Amiga Brotherhood
AAK said:
Things would be different if Sony used the money to make Lair to buy some nice exclusives.

But the main thing is the insult to the PS3. FFXIII was supposed to be THE game only possible on 360. With SE now showing that it will be possible on 360 with no differences only gives the impression that the PS3 isn't the all powerful game machine the public originally perceived.

Yeah, FFXIII was very much the PS3 vanity project along with MGS4. As well as being a huge franchise and system-seller, it was very much a showcase title for the system. In one fail swoop that was neutered yesterday.
 
Tretton concluded: "I think software companies look and say 'there's no check big enough for us to do exclusive development' ...I think it's going to be harder and harder to have third-party exclusives as we move forward."

So, despite the attempts to direct blame at MSFT's big pockets, this bit redirects attention to introspection that Sony itself finds it is now too much to pay for exclusive "favor".
 
Tretton concluded: "I think software companies look and say 'there's no check big enough for us to do exclusive development' ...I think it's going to be harder and harder to have third-party exclusives as we move forward."

The check for MGS4 seemed "big enough"
 

deepbrown

Member
PIMPBYBLUD said:
It's called doing business.
Nah microsoft does Microsoft business. It's completely different to the way other companies work. Once they got to the top they did everything to stay there, many of it included non-friendly-business work. Call it business? Nah. Call it Microsoft.
 

DC R1D3R

Banned
I really hope Sony isn't raising the white flag already. Sure, they're not willing to floss money around as liberally as MS, but they really need to dig in, and concentrate on the long haul now.

Although they're concentrating most of their efforts on in-house projects, Sony mustn't forget what got them to the top in the first place, exclusive third-party games. Losing FF XIII exclusivety is a hard blow to take (understandably), but they've just gotta roll with the punches.

Fight or die.
 
BruceWayneIII said:
Just a note, but I am still pretty impressed by how far they have come, if you look at it from my perspective: bought a PS3 PAL launch console 15 months ago. 15 months... That's like yesterday, if you know what I mean.

I'm not talking on a personal level, I love Sony's output, both last gen and so far this gen. However they are not even close to the Nintendo level of putting out consistant heavy hitters. And even if they could that doesn't guarantee success, as the Gamecube can testify.
 

Grayman

Member
crowphoenix said:
I would think it would be a good idea to curry favor from third parties.



It also looks like we're moving towards a one-experience future. We'll have multiple consoles, but they'll all act basically the same.
You know except for the fucking huge talent pool that sony signs cheques on.
 

VanMardigan

has calmed down a bit.
Vinci said:
Um ... I think you missed the point. Granny said Microsoft was buying its way to the top, but it's not on the top of anything in this industry.


Well, except online play. And Netflix.

They're the top selling HD videogame console, which is all that matters. :D
 
Top Bottom