I'll respond I guess. I have a hard time getting my attitude across apparently on GAF, so I'm going to do my last disclaimer as me wanting to see what a female MC for LoZ would look like, but thinking that the response to these Links being male is out of place.
Because lots of people are hungry for representation in these games
Now sure, females in games as MCs or the option to play a female is great and showing a more homogenized place in gaming. But when you say:
these games are you referring to LoZ?
and Link was always meant to be a character you identify with and project yourself on.
This is false though, Link, like many current characters from that time frame, have evolved into being a fully fledged character. As the games progressed, we got to see more "lore" connecting Link to being an actual character, shoddily last-second made timelines to show that he is an actual character that has many timelines, and more. Official manuals and more now better represent this a time has gone forward. With our latest 3D Zelda we got to see how Link as an actual character would look, and how that him having a personality was something that was apparent and one of the only redeeming factors, imo, of SS.
I don't know if that means it "should" change, because the decision will always begin and end with Nintendo.
But, that's not how many users, not even specifically you, on here are stating their opinion. I hate to make it a semantics game on "should" but:
"Link should be anything the player wants"
"Nintendo should make LoZ a character creator."
Problem being, this is
actively speaking and implies that the opposite
shouldn't be done ie:
"Link shouldn't be what the creator wants"
"Nintendo shouldn't make Link as a defined character."
For instance, I think it would be really cool to play as a FeMC, but more specifically Zelda as she has more potential here. I really would love one, but I'm not going to post that the developer is wrong for not making Link a female, as some have, and I'm not going to blame how the dev worded a very controversial subject in a way where it didn't blow up in his face. A FeMC is inevitable imo, with a female version of Link even being a bonus for the 3DS version of HW. Wanting a character to change is also great. But no developer is in the wrong for wanting Link to be a boy in their game. You last part says it best:
But it certainly means that it's what a lot of people want and if Nintendo ignores that, well, that's their right. But it doesn't change that people desperately want it.
--
Edit: On a separate note people like this add nothing to the conversation and are openly hostile to people making light fun.
Oh man thanks for clearing that up it was totally confusing everyone.