RustyNails
Member
I second this fix.ULTROS! said:fixed
I second this fix.ULTROS! said:fixed
Sony should probably sell their shares and run for the hills.Takao said:Hmm, because of these loses their stock will be taking a beating, no?
I wonder if Sony feels that 8% isn't enough...
hamchan said:FFXIV PS3 probably canned as well. They should move on and just forget that game ever existed.
God no >_< they might buy em or something...dino1980 said:They should take a trip to Poland and visit CD Project red.
RustyNails said:They should've closed the FF14 shop a long time ago and apologized for wasting everyone's time. In business, you never throw good money after bad.
Nirolak said:
Nirolak said:I hope no one was looking forward to Tactics Ogre 2.
Don't worry though, Kane & Lynch 3 is on the way.
Hey, when they bought Eidos, their quality went through the roof.markot said:God no >_< they might buy em or something...
It had a nice sense of style.Jerk said:I mean to pick up K&L2 eventually. Was it that bad?
markot said:God no >_< they might buy em or something...
Mindjack, 3rd Birthday, FFXIV and the likely cancellation of the PS3 version at this pointwonderfuldays said:How could they loss so much money? They didn't involve movie business these days don't they.
Ravidrath said:FFXI was BY FAR the most successful product Square has ever made.
It's going to be impossible for them to achieve the same level of success, but I actually don't think it's unrealistic for them to get it to make it operationally profitable and start working off some of their losses. Japan just doesn't have the same selection of MMOs, so in some regards it's a captive audience.
I think that would just confuse people.Regulus Tera said:Wouldn't it be wiser to rebrand FFVersusXIII as FFXIII instead of cancelling it?
markot said:God no >_< they might buy em or something...
Regulus Tera said:Wouldn't it be wiser to rebrand FFVersusXIII as FFXV instead of cancelling it?
Nirolak said:I think that would just confuse people.
Perhaps FFXV though.
Regulus Tera said:FFXIV to blame?
That's really good. I'll believe they're capable of it when it happens though.Nirolak said:
I think it should. It provides the game to a larger audience and increases chances of sales. Seems like the smart business decision. If I remember right, didn't the 360 version of FFXIII sell something like 1.5 million copies? Add that to the PS3's 4.1 million or something, and the overall number looks a lot better than it would on the PS3 alone. I doubt PS3 sales were affected in any way by that happening. It just puts the product in more hands which helps the developer.Bel Marduk said:XIII-2 already is multiplat. I really wonder if Versus will go multiplat though.
Well, what do you think the odds are of Dungeon Siege III selling well?Fredescu said:Does this mean they're not likely to fund more Obsidian games?
dino1980 said:They should take a trip to Poland and visit CD Project red.
Fredescu said:Does this mean they're not likely to fund more Obsidian games?
arnoldocastillo2003 said:NO.............
actually it made sense the first time around.Nirolak said:I think that would just confuse people.
Perhaps FFXV though.
Regulus Tera said:Wouldn't it be wiser to rebrand FFVersusXIII as FFXV instead of cancelling it?
Ravidrath said:And the PS3 port is likely already done, and possibly a good source of transient players. It'd be a mistake to manufacture discs, though - they should really just release it only on PSN so they don't sink money into inventory.
gundamkyoukai said:Versus won't get cancel but if they do i wonder if they would have to pay Sony .
What does it have to do with Sony? Are they funding/helping with development?gundamkyoukai said:Versus won't get cancel but if they do i wonder if they would have to pay Sony .
It still lives.Nakazato said:so is it confirmed the vs13 is canceled ??
Presumably it was Enix's IP, so that would mean Square Enix has it now.Dizzy-4U said:Who owns the Valkyrie Profile IP? Tri-Ace or Square?
gundamkyoukai said:Versus won't get cancel but if they do i wonder if they would have to pay Sony .
Regulus Tera said:Why not? It's obvious that there's no set "standard" as to what a Final Fantasy mainline title is anymore. Might as well take this huge project that has obviously siphoned a lot of development resources and maximise its appeal potential.
Nirolak said:Well, what do you think the odds are of Dungeon Siege III selling well?
That game will determine it.
arnoldocastillo2003 said:Yeah but that will mean that FFXIII-2 has to be released before FFXV so that people wont get even more confused, so thats why i said no.
harriet the spy said:And to think of all the money they could have made with even the shitiest remake of FFVII.
But no, HD towns is hard.
I am pretty bad at guessing these things, but I see very little hype for it around the traps and we're only a month out. I guess it depends what their expectations for it are.Nirolak said:Well, what do you think the odds are of Dungeon Siege III selling well?
There are some people who want it, if I can call them people. I don't know what they are. I've seen them around. Watching. Waiting.Unknown Soldier said:The funny thing is I don't think FFXIV had cost Squenix all that much really. The game was shipped with quite literally no content at all and it shared engine development costs with FFXIII.
They really should cancel FFXIII-2. Nobody wants that shit. Nobody.
Regulus Tera said:FFX-2 was released after FFXI.