Trogdor1123
Member
They really fucked this up...
I don't really give a damn about the avengers, but a lot of fans would prefer having someone like insomniac making good high budget superheroes games instead of wasting times and money with third party games like avengers.Funny to see the usual toxic, cancerous prattle about Sony or Microsoft buying this or that. That Bethesda thing really made many objectively dumber, it seems. So many people are so eager to prevent millions of othlike thier gamers from playing the games they want, it seems.
That's an absolutely silly take. I'm absolutely not a fan of GAAS (besides for MMORPGs), but it can work with literally ANY franchise. All it takes is for the game to be good, wich Genshin Impact is, and Avengers isn't.
GAAS isn't going anywhere, whether we like it or not. May as well get used to the idea.
I don't know how much Spiderman sold around this time.
I don't really give a damn about the avengers, but a lot of fans would prefer having someone like insomniac making good high budget superheroes games instead of wasting times and money with third party games like avengers.
It's not a matter of having exclusives, it's a matter of having good games, it's just a case if some studious very good with open worlds games and narrative driven games are under sony.
I'm a fan of dishonored and i want the third game being made by the same team who made the first 2 even if there is a chance of being xbox exclusive, is it selfish? Sure, do i give a fuck? No, i only care for a good sequel.
For someone whos not a fan of GAAS you sure do sound like one. No, it does not work with any game, nor should it.
Sony you know what do
I don't know how much Spiderman sold around this time.
But a bunch of old Mario games by Nintendo sold nearly twice that amount. And i doubt Mario is as big as The Avengers IP
Finally - a good take in this thread! You are absolutely 100% correct.Tons of people online give 343 a lot of crap for how their staff isn't the problem but instead it's the management holding the studio back. I'd make the argument this is even more apparent at SE, and has been for years.
No company in gaming would benefit more from an injection of new talent in upper management than SE.
916 players lmaoMarvel's Avengers - The Definitive Edition - Steam Charts
An ongoing analysis of Steam's player numbers, seeing what's been played the most.steamcharts.com
You don't need a game to be made by a first-party studio for it to be a "good high budget superheroes game." Third-party studios make plenty of awesome games.
Are you able to respond to what people actually say or you actually need to distort it? I did not say that it works with any game. I said it works with any franchise. And it does. It's different, and what you just did is called a strawman.
One doesn't need to be a fan of GAAS to know that they're not going anywhere. Publishers love consistent streams of revenue.
It's not only a matter of budget, some devs are better at certain things, insomniac and sucker punch have great experiences with superhero or wacky open world games so a lot of avengers fans want their games developed by them.You don't need a game to be made by a first-party studio for it to be a "good high budget superheroes game." Third-party studios make plenty of awesome games.
Are you able to respond to what people actually say or you actually need to distort it? I did not say that it works with any game. I said it works with any franchise. And it does. It's different, and what you just did is called a strawman.
One doesn't need to be a fan of GAAS to know that they're not going anywhere. Publishers love consistent streams of revenue.
Franchise, games, whatever you want to call them, it still does not work nor should it. I know theyre not going anywhere, I mean, its the publishers and corporations main income. They'd be stupid to let them go because they know people are idiots and will buy anything. GI is the perfect example for that but Avengers was not. That game was marketed completely different than what we got. Sony Exclusives also don't need gaas shit to sell butt loads. My point is, fuck GaaS but I can't do shit about it. Seems like Belgium had the balls to fuck Fifa and hopefully this is the beginning of the end for all franchises or games.
Not saying that third party devs can't do a great job, some of my goty for this gen were third party games, i was just vocalizing what a lot of people think, like i said, i don't care for the avengers brand.
Sony buying avengers brand would be as big as M buying bethesda.
There's a massive difference between a franchise and a game.
A franchise simply defines a setting and its characters. A game includes genre, gameplay, and more.
GAAS can absolutely work whatever setting, characters, and story you throw at it (Franchise). It certainly wouldn't work with all kinds of gameplay and genres (game).
You're accusing me of bias, but from your posts, you're the one looking at this with a biased eye.
What the fuck are you even talking about anymore. Games as a service are literally GAMES. Your wording of GAAS can work with any franchise by any fucking logic, sounds like you're saying gaming franchise which is again, a set of multiple games set in the same name/universe/whatever. What you're telling me is that what you actually wanted to say is that GAMES as a service can work with any fictional commercialized characters or names? I'm not brightest lad but how what? We are talking about games and gaas, nothing else. No, gaas should not work with any fictional setting, character, etc. because they're not games lmao.
I don't know how much Spiderman sold around this time.
But a bunch of old Mario games by Nintendo sold nearly twice that amount. And i doubt Mario is as big as The Avengers IP
One. Chill.
Two. GAAS can work with any franchise. IE: They can work with any setting/characters/story. That's what a franchise is.
A franchise isn't just a set of specific games. It's much wider than that. It's almost like you think the Avengers movies, comics, and such aren't part of the franchise because they're not games.
What defines the Avengers franchise as a franchise isn't its games. It's its characters, its setting, its storytelling, which can absolutely work with GAAS, like every franchise on earth.
It's a tweet talking about Marvel Avengers specifically, not the SE catalog.Funny how some charlatans report only the bad/controversial part of the news.
For the record, Square Enix reported strong financial results across the board, with all income/profit numbers up. Avengers may have gone below expectations, but everything else did well, including FFVII Remake, catalog repeat sales, FFXIV subscriber numbers are on the rise, mobile is doing great, and so forth.
Gaas can work with Colgate or McDonalds. Gotcha dude. It makes much more sense now.
It's a tweet talking about Marvel Avengers specifically, not the SE catalog.
No.GAAS isn't going anywhere, whether we like it or not. May as well get used to the idea.
Colgate and McDonalds aren't franchises, they're brands.
Yes, and as I mentioned, I find it funny that the person in question thought to tweet only about that, ignoring the fact that SE has reported great results overall.