go to bed
Suicide is irrational.
Not always.
? Absolutely nothing about the act of suicide is inherently rational.
I realize that other people depend on or feel pain from the loss but is it not more selfish to wish someone live through agony and despair in order to please you?
Suicide is irrational.
Its 4pm, but okay. If Plywood demands Plywood shall receive.
This topic always makes everyone so angry... I'm so tired of people being angry.
ɐıןɐɹʇsnɐ uı ǝןıɥʍuɐǝɯIts 4pm, but okay. If Plywood demands Plywood shall receive.
Why can't we wish they get better? It's not that I want someone to suffer but I'm optimistic. You are describing a terminal condition or a condition with no hope of changing but I would assume most suicides are not related to this kind of situation.I realize that other people depend on or feel pain from the loss but is it not more selfish to wish someone live through agony and despair in order to please you?
I realize that other people depend on or feel pain from the loss but is it not more selfish to wish someone live through agony and despair in order to please you?
This topic always makes everyone so angry... I'm so tired of people being angry.
I only think of it as irrational in the sense that you're choosing between something and nothing, so what's the point of choosing nothing? you're not gonna be "better off"
other than that, taking your own life seems pretty rational as far as acts go
Depends on the culture surely? Seppuku doesnt have as much stigma in the east as suicide does in the west. Over here we often attribute it to a mental disorder, where over there it is seen as atonement to the older generation.
It's complicated.
Well it's irrational in that it almost always is a decision made when you are not thinking rationally due to mental illness, which by definition skews your perception of reality. That's why I'd call it "irrational" even if suicide is a pretty simple decision calculus at the end of the day.
rational in the sense that I dont necessarely share the "people who kill themselves are crazy" aspect.
Why can't we wish they get better? It's not that I want someone to suffer but I'm optimistic. You are describing a terminal condition or a condition with no hope of changing but I would assume most suicides are not related to this kind of situation.
There are more options than living through agony and despair or killing yourself.
Human interaction is not a one-sided street, it works both ways. As social animals the interactions and connections we make we others is a joint-effort.
You could elaborate you know.
I have to guess "seppuku" isn't a very common tradition in anywhere anymore.
b) has to live for everyone but themselves
Making blanket statements about an act that has motivations that vary widely from person to person makes no sense.
One person may commit suicide because they are dying from a painful cancer. One may commit suicide because they lost all of their money to gambling. One may do it because they are insanely depressed. The first two may be entirely rational. The last one not.
It makes people angry because the sheer amount of ignorance is staggering. How can an act of taking a life be selfish unless you're stipulating that one has a) an obligation to live and b) has to live for everyone but themselves and c) has to somehow ignore their depression or mental torture in order to please everyone else in their life.
I only think of it as irrational in the sense that you're choosing between something and nothing, so what's the point of choosing nothing? you're not gonna be "better off"
other than that, taking your own life seems pretty rational as far as acts go
this is what makes it not that surprising to read tho. There's this weird sense of "heroism" going around (specially when someone just writes stuff) where you should absolutely put everyone else before you as far as priorities go, and that's just bullshit
well then you don't disagree with me!
Thank you. The "cowardly" bullshit pisses me off too.
this is what makes it not that surprising to read tho. There's this weird sense of "heroism" going around (specially when someone just writes stuff) where you should absolutely put everyone else before you as far as priorities go, and that's just bullshit
well then you don't disagree with me!
It makes people angry because the sheer amount of ignorance is staggering. How can an act of taking a life be selfish unless you're stipulating that one has a) an obligation to live and b) has to live for everyone but themselves and c) has to somehow ignore their depression or mental torture in order to please everyone else in their life.
It's not rational. They are not choosing it out of a wish to die. No one truly wishes to die. They wish for the pain to stop, nothing they do can make it stop, and once they get to that point they are pretty desperate. Think of it like an animal being chased by a predator. They can't just tell it to go away and everything will be fine. Eventually they're cornered. They don't know what to do. They might do something that is completely irrational at that point, because they are trapped. They no longer can think rationally. When people get to the point of considering suicide, that's what it's like for them. They don't want to die, but they don't know how to escape the pain.
It's not rational. They are not choosing it out of a wish to die. No one truly wishes to die. They wish for the pain to stop, nothing they do can make it stop, and once they get to that point they are pretty desperate. Think of it like an animal being chased by a predator. They can't just tell it to go away and everything will be fine. Eventually they're cornered. They don't know what to do. They might do something that is completely irrational at that point, because they are trapped. They no longer can think rationally. When people get to the point of considering suicide, that's what it's like for them. They don't want to die, but they don't know how to escape the pain.
If you think that suicide can be either rational or irrational depending on the person, sure.
Pretty much. You can't be a healthy, rational person and desire death. It goes against the most basic of our instincts.It's not rational. They are not choosing it out of a wish to die. No one truly wishes to die. They wish for the pain to stop, nothing they do can make it stop, and once they get to that point they are pretty desperate. Think of it like an animal being chased by a predator. They can't just tell it to go away and everything will be fine. Eventually they're cornered. They don't know what to do. They might do something that is completely irrational at that point, because they are trapped. They no longer can think rationally. When people get to the point of considering suicide, that's what it's like for them. They don't want to die, but they don't know how to escape the pain.
Seppuku as a ritual? No. The suicide rate is still stupidly high as a legacy though.
I realize that other people depend on or feel pain from the loss but is it not more selfish to wish someone live through agony and despair in order to please you?
Goddamn, I love this post.Whether due to extreme mental illness (grief, PTSD, depression) or from external factors (living in a hellscape where you could be murdered at any moment like probably millions of people right this second, being in an inescapable cycle of abuse), it isn't up to happy, mentally sound individuals to declare whether your act was one of cowardice or not. That comes across as a total lack of empathy to me.
There's a simpler angle, too: Imagine you are plagued by constant thoughts of how worthless you are. You try to kill yourself. Someone close to you says, "how could you ever try to do that? Only cowards would do that! Are you a coward?" It isn't a far logical leap for a depressed person to think in that moment, "yes, I guess you're right. I guess I am a coward."
Referring to a suicidal person as "cowardly" only actively harms them. The person it helps is you, as you get to assign some kind of abstract trait to explain away why this sad thing would occur instead of confronting it and trying to understand it. It becomes, instead, a question of manliness, and you, apparently, passed the test. Good for you! You're number one at life!
Sure, thus they think "I cant escape this, might as well end it", that's, in a way, a completely rational solution. Stupid and pointless as it might be.
That's the angle I was taking, as others showed it depends on your definition, I was thinking of irrationality as far as the act itself goes.
It makes people angry because the sheer amount of ignorance is staggering. How can an act of taking a life be selfish unless you're stipulating that one has a) an obligation to live and b) has to live for everyone but themselves and c) has to somehow ignore their depression or mental torture in order to please everyone else in their life.
For me, the question is more, 'can you ever respect the act of killing someone, even if it's suicide?'. If someone kills another person, there is more to judge about that act than the part about having taken someone's life against their will. There's also the thought that the person committed lethal aggression. It's a monstrous low in the eyes of many. Is there a difference in doing that to yourself? I'm not really sure.
Why are you acting like I'm stipulating suicide is the only answer? I'm merely talking about the response to the act itself.
Maybe later, i'm still in a happy mood this morning so I don't want to ruin that by searching through a large volume of morbidity. =pYou need to cough up some research linking the tradition of seppuku rites to modern suicide rates in Japan or something :b
For me, the question is more, 'can you ever respect the act of killing someone, even if it's suicide?'. If someone kills another person, there is more to judging that act than just having taken someone's life against their will. There's also the thought that the person committed lethal aggression. It's a monstrous low in the eyes of many. Is there a difference in doing that to yourself? I'm not really sure.
I do agree that the 'cowardly/selfish' thing is a poor thing to say, though.
Again, whether or not it is right or wrong is irrelevant when the person is not acting rationally.