:lolMemles said:I GIVE some of those ratings, and seriously: do not try to find logic.
I just won't think about the grades anymore, because (as I said) the actual content of the reviews is really great.
:lolMemles said:I GIVE some of those ratings, and seriously: do not try to find logic.
Really excellent interview. It's always cool when an actor really understands his show. I thought logue's take on the ending was cool:Cornballer said:- THE SURF REPORT talks to Donal Logue about all things TERRIERS12/1/10 (scroll down for the interview)
EDIT: Great interview with a lot of insight into the finale and Donal Logue in general. Can't wait for part 2.
DL: At the end of season one, the emotional maelstrom swirls around Britt and Hank, even if they sit in the calm eye of the storm having a bit of a tell-me-about-the-rabbit-farm Of Mice and Men moment, except in the Terriers version, both are aware the rabbit farm is an impossible fantasy. Hank knows that things are still very dangerous as he doesnt think for a moment a tremendously powerful man with very dark secrets would take his word to stay mum about them and let it be. Hank is also (I think) trying to figure out a way to keep Britt safe once he is in prison. My feeling, and not necessarily Teds, Tims or Shawns, is that Hank is plotting to go into hiding, but in such a manner (maybe using Mark and Officer Robledo to help him) that he can ensure Steph, Gretchen and Katies safety. Britt, I think, is ready to take his punishment and come out ready to do the right thing by Katie.
big ander said:And according to Twitter, there's a campaign called Pimp Daddy Thursday:
everyone buy the episode Pimp Daddy today/tomorrow December 2nd on iTunes or Amazon.
I'll be buying it and the finale once it's up.
Reseil said:I wonder how much the ratings dictated the story line towards the end. My biggest fear was that we'd have another Rubicon type ending, the show would get canceled and we'd be bitter on multiple fronts due to open story lines.
Yep, it's so cool because it's not a cliffhanger that leaves the first season story incomplete. It just comes to a close and looks to the future.Reseil said:I wonder how much the ratings dictated the story line towards the end. My biggest fear was that we'd have another Rubicon type ending, the show would get canceled and we'd be bitter on multiple fronts due to open story lines.
That said, I really enjoyed the season and the finale was fantastic. Wrapped up the loose ends in the case they get dropped (please NOOOOOO) and gave a perfect cliff hanger in case they get another season.
What a great show, I really hope they give it another season.
big ander said:@Clevinger: Finale is up? Sweet, I'll buy it when I'm home.
SpeedingUptoStop said:Yea, I'm pretty sure the whole season was in the can before it first aired, so the end became oddly poetic.
Stream the older episodes on Hulu (I'm doing that in the background at work right now) or buy episodes from iTunes/Amazon (I'm going to grab Pimp Daddy and the finale tonight when I get home.)Reseil said:I just wish there was something beyond sending emails folks could do to show enough interest that would warrant another season.
Cornballer said:Stream the older episodes on Hulu (I'm doing that in the background at work right now) or buy episodes from iTunes/Amazon (I'm going to grab Pimp Daddy and the finale tonight when I get home.)
Amazing stuff. Hope it comes out on Amazon soon.Cornballer said:
Fingers crossed.Eggplant Wizard said:Ratings were up a little last night. Not sure if it's enough for a renewal though.
:lol :lol :lolCornballer said:Or punch them and explain it's on general principle.
More via the link.Trying to avoid a similar fate is "Terriers," which fell to some 540,000 viewers and a 0.2 rating in 18-49 in its Nov. 10 airing before showing relative signs of life with 725,000 viewers and a 0.4 on Nov. 17. Its season finale on Dec. 1 drew 784,000.
Showrunner Shawn Ryan will take the good news where he can get it, but "Terriers" still has what Ryan calls "an uphill climb" as he tries to convince FX prexy John Landgraf that the show's growth potential makes it worthy of renewal.
"I understand the reality of the situation," Ryan says, "and I understand that John and (his colleagues) run a business and they have people they have to answer to in terms of profits. "But it seems they've done a good job of making the company profitable, and maybe there's room for us (to grow). We'll make that case."
Ryan, who previously made seven-year enterprise "The Shield" a defining show for FX, says he was never under any illusion that he didn't have to worry about audience size.
"I never considered that the promise," he says. "Obviously, if you have ads in the middle of a show, the ratings are going to matter. (But) at a place like FX, quality is really important, and I think that they've shown greater patience than most ad-supported networks."
To be sure, cable remains immune from the kind of summary execution that befell the fall's top-reviewed broadcast series, "Lone Star," guillotined by Fox after two weeks. Ryan points out that FX rode out the ratings-challenged first season of "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia," which will complete its fifth campaign this month. And although FX has parted ways with "Damages," the cabler stuck with the Glenn Close starrer for three seasons, all the way through April's season finale (900,000 viewers, 0.2 demo rating).
"There's a certain threshold that really does matter to them," Ryan says.
squicken said:I hate Hollywood jargon. "topper" "cabler" "starrer" "lensing"
They're made up words by the hangers-on in the press to make themselves important.
FX cancels 'Terriers'
By Alan Sepinwall - Quality was incredibly high, ratings were pathetically low for underdog detective drama
FX sold "Terriers" with the tagline "too small to fail." It's a line that has sadly proved ironic, as FX has decided not to renew the show for a second season, due to ratings that could only charitably be called "small."
The finale drew 784,000 viewers, which was one of the show's bigger audiences. Many episodes averaged around 500,000, and that number just isn't viable, even on basic cable. Even when I wrote my Save "Terriers" piece, I feared deep down that even FX president John Landgraf, one of the business' biggest champions of quality TV, couldn't rationalize keeping the show around.
Landgraf is actually doing something fairly rare in the business: he's doing a conference call later this afternoon to discuss the cancellation - and no doubt to lament the fact that it didn't do well enough to stick around. Because as you and I have said many, many times, the show itself was fantastic, and deserving of a much better fate and bigger audience.
I'll have a second write-up after the Landgraf call, and possibly with some comment from Shawn Ryan and/or Ted Griffin if they're available. But like I said in my review of the series finale, we still have these great 13 episodes, and we'll still always have Hank and Britt in the pickup, waiting to decide whether to go straight or turn left. And that's something.
Not really, though I am looking forward to bitterly making fun of people in all of the LTTP: Terriers is awesome; Why didn't anyone tell me to watch this show? threads in the future.big ander said:Edit: anybody want to start a new topic with just the news story just to see how many people thought it was about dogs?