• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

The Evil Within PC Performance Thread

The miserable performance made me not buy the game.

I'm writing that just in the case someone from the devs or the publishers are reading. YES, it hurts your sales, yes, some customers ARE voting with their wallet, not just talking about it.
 
It finally showed up.

5tag1o6.png
 
That's what I tought... 4 Cores and each of those with as much power as you can get...They shouldn't have tested in 1080p however, this will have a decent impact in the results, even with a GTX 780 Ti.

My poor old OC'd Bloomfield's gonna puke... I'll guess I'll be around somewhere where the FX-8350 is. Well, guess it's downsampling without big framerate-impact for me then ;-)

Yeah definitely setting a much lower resolution (I would say settings too but there aren't really that many) would be nice to see if that separates things out a little more. There does seem to be this growing trend of performing 'real world' tests for CPUs. Sure fine when you're comparing GPUs but I'd rather see that overhead taken out of the equation when seeing what a nice broad batch on CPUs can do.

Are you guys at PCGH doing any benches for this?
 
i just played more of this game and wow its a stunner. it CAN def be enjoyed at 30fps and its smooth. instead of watching the fps counter in the top right i actually played the game and after about 5mins its very playable so give it a chance. im happy that the fps is a solid 30fps and im playing at 1440p. looks gorgeous.

GTX970 4GB
i7 2600K 4.5Ghz

now back to the game :)
 
i just played more of this game and wow its a stunner. it CAN def be enjoyed at 30fps and its smooth. instead of watching the fps counter in the top right i actually played the game and after about 5mins its very playable so give it a chance. im happy that the fps is a solid 30fps and im playing at 1440p. looks gorgeous.

GTX970 4GB
i7 2600K 4.5Ghz

now back to the game :)

Well, speaking from experience you could run it unlocked and get a pretty stable 60 at 1440p. Does drop to 50 once in a while.
 
I know games have gone off the deep end with requirements as of late, but should the game run okay on a 2GB 770 GTX/I5-4670K OC'd to 4ghz and 8 gigs of ram? I am not trying to unlock the fps due to not caring about that. I just want to play the game at reasonable performance.
 
You are right, I knew this day would come. Hell, I knew it was on the horizon when I had to enable pixel doubling to make BF4 run halfway decent.

It's ok. You held out for a while, and now when you upgrade, you'll be able to play everything you experienced on that machine in a whole new light. It's one of the best things about PC gaming, IMO.
 
I know games have gone off the deep end with requirements as of late, but should the game run okay on a 2GB 770 GTX/I5-4670K OC'd to 4ghz and 8 gigs of ram? I am not trying to unlock the fps due to not caring about that. I just want to play the game at reasonable performance.

You'll be fine. The VRAM requirement was overblown, surprisingly so.
 
Are you guys at PCGH doing any benches for this?

Yeah, there will be benchmarks (probably the day after twomorrow) - I'll have to do them anyways because I got myself grabbed by our sister-magazine. Might as well just do it right. I will also try to do some CPU-benches, but I got a lot of work coming towards me... Some Intels and AMDs should be possible however, I think the CPU might actually have a bigger impact than the GPU (at least on 1080p), even if you unlock the framerate.

I would love to try my i7-920 @3,6 GHz. However, I have to download this sucker again although I did bring the files on a portable HDD. GPU-wise, I should be better off than the Titan, maybe something around 70 fps, but I'd wager I'll be more like 40-50 fps because of my CPU. That's just a wild guess of course, but that's what I'm expecting from id-tech5. Maybe I'll be pleasantly supprised, but I don't think so.
 
I know games have gone off the deep end with requirements as of late, but should the game run okay on a 2GB 770 GTX/I5-4670K OC'd to 4ghz and 8 gigs of ram? I am not trying to unlock the fps due to not caring about that. I just want to play the game at reasonable performance.

I've got the same card as you and a 3570k and I'm getting 30fps at 1080 just fine.
 
Is the Steam Overlay not working for anyone else with this game? It's enabled in the game's settings, as well as steam's settings, but in game the overlay is just disabled for w/e reason :\
 
So far so good, 1080p max settings and a solid 30fps (had to turn the film grain down to 75% though, far to bluish at 100%) - running a PII X3 450 unlocked @ X4 3.8ghz along with a super clocked GTX480 with 1.5gb ram. Is there no way to set anything manually regarding textures?, i was wondering is it possible to force a higher level on them.
 
The miserable performance made me not buy the game.

I'm writing that just in the case someone from the devs or the publishers are reading. YES, it hurts your sales, yes, some customers ARE voting with their wallet, not just talking about it.

There there,
This game doesn't need your miserable sale.


By the way, your post history is fucking weird dude.
I mean, I understand you like "60 fps" yadda yadda, but that's insanity.
Go get some fresh air.
 
Are you sure crossfire is working? I know idTech5 doesn't work with SLI and I was pretty sure it was the same with crossfire setups.

I don't believe it is because I've disabled it and I get the same performance on my 295x2.....what a shame, at least it is still performing at 60fps.
My OC'd Qnix am cry :(
 
Why is idTech 5 so bad? Why would they choose to use an engine that makes a game with awful graphics have performance equal to games like Crysis 3.
 
Why is idTech 5 so bad? Why would they choose to use an engine that makes a game with awful graphics have performance equal to games like Crysis 3.

As weird as this port is, making a modern game engine is such a massive undertaking. idTech 5 is what they had.
 
In simple words, GAF, should I remove the black bars? Does it fuck with the aspect ratio or anything? Will my experience get dulled if i do so or should I stick to the regular aspect ratio the game comes with?
 
I know games have gone off the deep end with requirements as of late, but should the game run okay on a 2GB 770 GTX/I5-4670K OC'd to 4ghz and 8 gigs of ram? I am not trying to unlock the fps due to not caring about that. I just want to play the game at reasonable performance.

I tried a GTX 770 with 2 Gigs and it ran just fine, getting slightly less than 60 fps in the opening scene, which seems like it is rather demanding compared to the rest. Your CPU should be pretty good as well.

Personally, I'd go for 60 fps. Just put +set com_allowConsole 1 in your Steam-launch-options and once ingame, hit insert and put r_swapinterval -1 in the console, then hit insert again and have fun. You should be okay form what I gathered. That might break some in-game physics, but the developers said, they would optimize the PC-version for 60 fps after release (there seems to be a patch loading just now).
 
This game runs great on my pc. I was worried after some of the negative buzz I heard about the port. Huge black bars and capped framerate notwithstanding.

i5 3.2 GHz
32 GB memory
Nvidia gtx 760
 
So far so good, 1080p max settings and a solid 30fps (had to turn the film grain down to 75% though, far to bluish at 100%) - running a PII X3 450 unlocked @ X4 3.8ghz along with a super clocked GTX480 with 1.5gb ram. Is there no way to set anything manually regarding textures?, i was wondering is it possible to force a higher level on them.
Maybe through a config file? It worked for Rage and Wolfenstein, so why not here?

Create a new file (newconfig.cfg) in the base folder and add these commands to it:

vt_pageimagesizeuniquediffuseonly2 8192
vt_pageimagesizeuniquediffuseonly 8192
vt_pageimagesizeunique 8192
vt_pageimagesizevmtr 8192
vt_restart

You can double (16384) or halve (4096) the values if you want.

Open the console and type "exec newconfig.cfg" without the quotes and hit enter. I doubt this will work, but it's worth a shot.
 
So I benchmarked hyper threading on VS off. All settings at their highest. Framerate unlocked. Vsync on. Display at 144 Hz. Benchmark was the entire opening cutscene followed by one lap around the rainy courtyard.

1080p HT On: Avg: 87.634 - Min: 45 - Max: 142
1080p HT Off: Avg: 72.174 - Min: 46 - Max: 137
4K HT On: Avg: 34.641 - Min: 25 - Max: 51
4K HT Off: Avg: 34.214 - Min: 23 - Max: 50

So yeah, hyper threading definitely helps unless you're running at high resolutions like 4K where you're definitely going to be GPU limited.
 
So I benchmarked hyper threading on VS off. All settings at their highest. Framerate unlocked. Vsync on. Display at 144 Hz. Benchmark was the entire opening cutscene followed by one lap around the rainy courtyard.

1080p HT On: Avg: 87.634 - Min: 45 - Max: 142
1080p HT Off: Avg: 72.174 - Min: 46 - Max: 137
4K HT On: Avg: 34.641 - Min: 25 - Max: 51
4K HT Off: Avg: 34.214 - Min: 23 - Max: 50

So yeah, hyper threading definitely helps unless you're running at high resolutions like 4K where you're definitely going to be GPU limited.

That's actually a thing id-tech5 does well. So with the results I got with an GTX Titan @1080p (~65fps) I guess those guys really are GPU-bound somewhat :)

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-The_Evil_Within_-test-evilwithin_proz.jpg


They should've dropped the resolution. I was getting more than a hundred fps @720p with an oc'd 4790K and that Titan... though the engine had some CPU-hickups here and there, dropping the fps quite a bit for a slit-second if you'd force it...
 
The miserable performance made me not buy the game.

I'm writing that just in the case someone from the devs or the publishers are reading. YES, it hurts your sales, yes, some customers ARE voting with their wallet, not just talking about it.
Eh, its not so bad from a Japanese developer's first go at a PC port.

Game looks cool. I'd buy it already but I'm still playing some other stuff. Will get it soon, though. Certainly not gonna deprive myself just cuz its not a fantastic port.
 
Eh, its not so bad from a Japanese developer's first go at a PC port.

Game looks cool. I'd buy it already but I'm still playing some other stuff. Will get it soon, though. Certainly not gonna deprive myself just cuz its not a fantastic port.

Embrace the evil within Sean. You know you want to.
 
Why is my game cutting off three quarters of the image when I set it to 1920x1080? What a joke. I just want to play.
If it is what i think go to "SteamApps\common\TheEvilWithin" > right click on EvilWithin.exe > Properties > switch to "Compatibility" tab > "Disable display scaling on high DPI settings"
 
That's actually a thing id-tech5 does well. So with the results I got with an GTX Titan @1080p (~65fps) I guess those guys really are GPU-bound somewhat :)

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-The_Evil_Within_-test-evilwithin_proz.jpg
Aww, why can't I get games at a solid 60 with a 780ti these days? I really need a gsync monitor. Anyone with a 780ti and 3570k or something similar get a solid 60?
 
Hi people just a quick post to hopefully help some of you , i'm running uncapped frame rate and forcing vsync through control panel nice and smooth for me so far.
 
Game looks cool. I'd buy it already but I'm still playing some other stuff. Will get it soon, though.

Yeah, I'm actually looking forward trying this one out. Performance and graphics aren't everything - and I'm a tech-guy.

I actually felt bad dissing Bethesda/Machine Games for the miserable performance Wolfenstein delivered...while really loving that game. It's like telling a person you really like that (s)he's looking ugly as hell. And afterwards having to listen to all their complaints about your shallowness and also their mothers because he ran to her complaining about what you said (read: the PR-guys calling my boss, who then again got pissed off and started complaining to me about the complaints he got). Then again, sometimes you just have to be brutally straightforward. ;-) Maybe that's why I didn't get a copy early...

So yeah, The Evil Within might have some technical flaws. It just might be a pretty awesome game non-the-less. And from what I've seen and tried myself (PS4) it's not too bad from a technical perspective - certainly not with 60 Fps unlocked and promised to be supported by the developer. Now we just have to get rid of those stupid black bars and I might actually be happy with the port - PS4 and Xbox One are certainly not better off than a half-way decent PC.
 
Thanks. I guess I'll be experimenting with this a lot then to see what works and looks better. Sucks that this is the case though.

Yeah, it's a bummer. I've found that setting the bars at "2" in the debug menu is a pretty good medium. The bars are still there, but not as crazy as they are at default, and you can still keep a somewhat decent FOV.

No word from Bethesda on changing FOV, huh?
 
From what I have seen I should be able to get 30fps on an i7-4770 and amd 270x setup. Seems good enough, though slightly disappointing.
 
Is everyone here playing with Controller or KB/M? I don't have a controller right now so I'm worried I won't be able to enjoy it... :(

well IF you need a gun, its gotta be fast and precise, so I dont see why I wouldnt play this with mouse and keyboard. I have a 360 pad and prefer it in many genres, just finished mordor with it. but evil within is a clear M/K game for me.
 
Top Bottom