Now that's what Australian of the Year stands for, he should have received that honour. Glad to see our country's politicians eventually got to apologising and rewriting the history books for Norman.
Not to be too blunt, but it's a predominantly white former British colony. What were you expecting? That said, the article's comparison to South Africa is superficial. Australia got off as "scot free" for racism as the US, UK, Canada, etc... all of which (including Australia) were critics of apartheid.I wasn't as fully aware that Australia has such a legacy of discrimination, hatred and bigotry. While South Africa gets reviled Australia got off relatively scot free.
Indigenous deaths in custody is a national shame. The difference between Australia and America in this regard is that there is less firearm violence overall and there isn't a disadvantaged minority making up around 15% of the population.Racism is still a huge issue all over Australia, but it seems to be worse on the east coast and in Queensland. There are more racists in QLD then the rest of the country combined.
I'd like to think it's still better here than over in the US though. We will probably never be rid of racists but at least it isn't government sponsored (anymore) and unlike the US, our police force don't go around murdering black Australians.
Not Australian of the Century?
Heartfelt story, however that page is pure unadultered clickbait trash, smh.
I'd imagine many people don't even know this photo let alone the people in it.
Nah the OP is the perfect hook. Most people wouldnt bother reading the article otherwise. Which they should, its a fantastic write up.
Not Australian of the Century?
More impressive is that he didn't cave. He never betrayed his morals despite the hardship and, I'm sure, the massive pressure to do so. That takes a lot of strength.Yeah great story.
He had quite the shitty life because of his actions (because the world is fucked up) but not one regret.
Them dudes carried his coffin.
Unrelated, but is there a way to hide the awful recommend articles sidebar on that site? Clickbait and stock photos kind of take away from the message a bit.
$(".right_content").style.display = "none"
The Wikipedia page for the awards ceremony itself says 1972 was the first, and only, Olympics that Australia strangely decided to send a whopping zero male sprinters, which I think presents their claim a third place finish in one race made him lose his chance to someone else a little strange.According to Wikipedia the Australian Olympic Committee refutes a few of these allegations, and were a little puzzled by the 2012 apology.
He was apparently never banned from 1972 or 2000.
Asked whether, aside from the apology, the AOC would support Norman's recognition for his achievements on the track, Tancred evoked another great and arguably better-known Australian Olympian, distance runner Herb Elliott.
"There's people like Herb Elliot who won gold medals in 1960. We're not acknowledging Herb Elliot... so why do we have to acknowledge that Peter Norman might hold a 200-meter record? There are lots of champions out there who have done equally as well or better than Peter Norman."
Tancred also said that the debate in Federal Parliament was "irrelevant" given the progress made in civil rights since the 1968 Games.
"The politicians from both sides need to look and check on who is the American President, at present. He's black. And I think the whole world has moved on since 1968. So on that score, really, their debate is irrelevant," he said.
Thanks for responding. I read the references but I'm still confused over the debacle surrounding the '72 games... it seems like there's little to no information about the absence, apart from the fact that there was one: I'm not sure in and of itself it proves anything. I mean, why not just ban him? If they completely avoided any entry into that event (including the first and second place getters) to avoid hurting his feelings, that's very uncool, but it definitely doesn't speak of this "terrible treatment" by 'Australia' in this thread etc. I'd like to get more info about that scenario for sure.The Wikipedia page for the awards ceremony itself says 1972 was the first, and only, Olympics that Australia strangely decided to send a whopping zero male sprinters, which I think presents their claim a third place finish in one race made him lose his chance to someone else a little strange.
Also, the guy the AOC had criticizing the parliament over the then-potential apology sounds like a bitter, racist idiot (CNN):
That's...quite the leap from a man standing silently while something goes on behind him with another country's national anthem playing as the context.
Great story all the same, I never knew the guy became an outcast back home. Damn shame.
Truly amazing story. This statue should really be updated to reflect the three men.Sounds like they should update that statue.
Really? I'm guessing you are not American. This is a massively iconic moment for the American Civil Rights Movement and quite well known, obviously.
Pretty old news. Do people really not get curious about the white guy in the pic?
More impressive is that he didn't cave. He never betrayed his morals despite the hardship and, I'm sure, the massive pressure to do so. That takes a lot of strength.
This guy is a hero.
Americano and had never seen this. I follow zero things about sports and the olympics. Never cared and never will but I do like this picture's story.Iconic for African Americans sure, but honestly if you showed this to 100+ I feel like vast majority of them wouldn't know the photo. Sure many of them will be able to guess based on context but my faith in my fellow Americans is at an all time low.
Never seen it before, but I'm not American.Really? I'm guessing you are not American. This is a massively iconic moment for the American Civil Rights Movement and quite well known, obviously.
I did but only because of the parts where the poor guy's life was ruined because of it. I'm not selfless like that but I definitely respect the man for it.Anyone else tear up a little reading that?
I mean.. Dust. This room is a bit dusty.
Yeah Australian here, im 44 and i never even knew he was an aussie & still holds the 200m record here great read many thanksBetter late than never..but dang Australia.
Why does the article call the two Americans the "two fastest men in the world" if the Australian was second place?