Sentenza
Member
Only significant if that means mod support, IMO.
Well, considering how they are trying to push their own engine and toolset, I would take that almost for granted.
Only significant if that means mod support, IMO.
So console owners, "Pay more get less"? I did not play the PC version but how much of the original free DLC was packed in with "EE" version of the game on 360?
AFAIK they are still looking for a new one. [source]I don't think this was covered: was a publisher announced for the title?
Redkit should be available in 2013. [source]Only significant if that means mod support, IMO.
Witcher 3 will get free DLC and a free enhanced edition [source=gameinformer]Hopefully it doesn't affect their DLC policies on the PC.
well, I seriously hope that's not the case. Even game sites should have some standards.possibly as a reviewer for a gaming website. Not certain, but it just feels so familiar...
I hate sequels with a passion and I don't even like The Witcher 2, but that guy should calm the fuck down. CD Projekt RED is a much better studio than several 'industry leaders'.
Googling Scott Hutchinson reveals that he's some dude with a youtube channel. Reading his tweets reveals that he's an idiot.
Nobody should care what he thinks, less of them all CDPR.
Looks like PC remains their biggest focus:
An (lol) objective troll is still an idiot in my bookI think he's a troll. His YT pretty much shows he's a PC gamer as well as a console gamer. Not like he's a complete console fanboy.
He's just fishing for clicks.
http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/6609/consolebutthurt.jpg
Is dudes shit wack also?Guy talks smack about PC and publishers he knows nothing about.
Guy looks like a manchild on the internet. Nothing new to see here, folks.
There is a new video on Game Informer. Looks like they want to fund the game entirely on their own.
http://www.gameinformer.com/b/featu...siness-of-the-witcher-and-cd-projekt-red.aspx
There is a new video on Game Informer. Looks like they want to fund the game entirely on their own.
http://www.gameinformer.com/b/featu...siness-of-the-witcher-and-cd-projekt-red.aspx
Really? because I got the exact opposite impression."Reach to the wider audience"
Probably he should take a few PR lesson before stating something like this, especially if he talk about their fanbase. Right now above statements is like saying "we don't care about our fans"
"Reach to the wider audience"
Probably he should take a few PR lesson before stating something like this, especially if he talk about their fanbase. Right now above statements is like saying "we don't care about our fans"
"Reach to the wider audience"
Probably he should take a few PR lesson before stating something like this, especially if he talk about their fanbase. Right now above statements is like saying "we don't care about our fans"
(Vampires are poisonous?)
"Reach to the wider audience"
Probably he should take a few PR lesson before stating something like this, especially if he talk about their fanbase. Right now above statements is like saying "we don't care about our fans"
I've read similar complaints about the title a lot of times at this point (here on GAF) and I still don't get what's supposed to be wrong about it.My biggest issue with The Witcher 3 is its subtitle "Wild Hunt". It makes it sound like an ugly expansion pack.
Really? because I got the exact opposite impression.
He states quite clearly that they want more people to play the game, but for what it is.
"We want to stay with the fans we have right now", etc.
if anything, you're right about a thing: he didn't sound like PR expert at all.
Which I would count as a big plus, as in fact he sounded refreshingly honest about what he said, unlike most PR people.
"Wild Hunt" itself sounds pretty cool. But it's weird to title the third game in a series with a subtitle when the first two games didn't have any. It's the same as Bioware naming ME3 "Mass Effect 3: tHE DRAMAZ!" or something like that despite ME1 and ME2 having none. Darksiders was also titled "Darksiders: Wrath of War", but I think the devs scratched the subtitle along the way, luckily.I've read similar complaints about the title a lot of times at this point (here on GAF) and I still don't get what's supposed to be wrong about it.
Maybe it's because I'm not a native English speaker, so I don't perceive how bad it can sound in a different cultural context. No idea.
I don't know, complexity of quests is a very relative thing, in my opinion hardly related with narrative.As of quests i don't think they will be complex if they want to create a lot of them for their massive world.
Well, actually the second one was called "The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings"."Wild Hunt" itself sounds pretty cool. But it's weird to title the third game in a series with a subtitle when the first two games didn't have any.
"Wild Hunt" itself sounds pretty cool. But it's weird to title the third game in a series with a subtitle when the first two games didn't have any. It's the same as Bioware naming ME3 "Mass Effect 3: tHE DRAMAZ!" or something like that despite ME1 and ME2 having none. Darksiders was also titled "Darksiders: Wrath of War", but I think the devs scratched the subtitle along the way, luckily.
Also, I'm looking forward to "The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt: Enhanced Edition".
Oh wow.
That guy is a regular on a forum i go on and he's a dick on there too.
According to Nordlings, the Wild Hunt is a procession, or rather a cavalcade of skeletal horsemen. They rush across the sky on the bony remains of steeds. Clad in rusty remnants of armor, they wear jagged swords at their waists. Like comets, the Wild Hunt is an omen of war, which has been confirmed beyond all doubt.
The spectral cavalcade ventures out in search of victims every several years, but its harvest was never as rich as just before the last war with Nilfgaard, when over twenty souls went missing Novigrad alone after the Hunt passed through. Curiously, elven and dwarven legends make not the slightest mention of the Wild Hunt.
which guy?
Yep.Wild Hunt refers to the old European myth of seeing hunters race across the sky. Seeing this is a bad omen.
There is a new video on Game Informer. Looks like they want to fund the game entirely on their own.
http://www.gameinformer.com/b/featu...siness-of-the-witcher-and-cd-projekt-red.aspx
Which isn't really that hard since Polish money is like... beercans and toilet paper.
maad.gif
Some of you guys seem to think Poland is some sort of desperate third world country and developers' salaries at CDPR are a tenth of the average in the industry.Which isn't really that hard since Polish money is like... beercans and toilet paper.
Witcher 2 cost like $10 million, but it had the production values of a $40 million game. The exchange rate just works out in their favor, for the same reason Japan is getting fucked right now.