SweetDonuts
Member
Ugh I hate these, I was using one once and it sprayed the water back on my mouth I felt like throwing up
all the ones i can think of off the top of my head either open inwards or have no door.
You think that's bad, wait until you see a toilet!
I fucking hate these things. Always feels like I'm playing a shitty balancing mini-game where I have to wash my hands again if I fail.
Uh, nah. Pee is nearly sterile when it exits the body, but it's also full of nutrients with very little to stop any kind of proliferation. If it sits out for more than 30 minutes or so it's chock full of germs.Actually the toilets themselves unless directly shat upon are relatively clean and harmless as urine is pretty sterile. The toilet and stall door HANDLES however come in contact with fecal matter constantly as the next step from the toilet paper (that can leak bacteria through to the fingers) is to the flusher and the door and also your clothing.
Have fun with that thought next time you grab a stall door lock or flusher
Shit Particles sounds like a good name for a band
Or maybe a clan
My workplace didn't have any paper towels for about 6 weeks, and then about 2 weeks ago they removed the paper towel dispenser and added a dyson airblade V.
Are paper towels super expensive or something? I still struggle to understand this.
One is a consumable. The other is a static machine with a one off cost that runs on electricity. The latter will be cheaper over the long run than the former.
Yes. Sterile paper products are very expensive, they're one of the biggest costs in restaurants.My workplace didn't have any paper towels for about 6 weeks, and then about 2 weeks ago they removed the paper towel dispenser and added a dyson airblade V.
Are paper towels super expensive or something? I still struggle to understand this.
I mean is the benefit that big to completely remove it? It seems like such a small thing. Paper towels are always better.
Germs are good for us they make me strong
I'd say that it's good to limit one's exposure to pathogenic bacteria as much as possible, but mainly so we don't spread it to those who may be immunocompromised and won't handle it as well. A large number of people don't wash their hands because they don't see it as a necessity, but a lot of transmissions could be reduced if people just used soap and water. Bacteria are certainly ubiquitous, but they need a substrate to grow on.Being not that obsessive with cleanliness have helped me in the long run. I rarely get sick and I have no social obstructions with any fear of germs so I can do whatever I want. I'll touch the door handles of public bathrooms with my hands and come out just fine cause I still have a immune system that works.
It is almost hilarious how obsessive people are with cleanliness and germs when A: it exists all around us and B: your body handles 99% of it just fine.
Didn't Mythbusters run an episode that tested dryers vs. paper towels? Think the result was that paper towels were more efficient but you should of course also bloody use soap and water where the drying method after doesn't matter.
Also a air dryer is in the long-term cheaper and more environmentally efficient.
It is true.
Being not that obsessive with cleanliness have helped me in the long run. I rarely get sick and I have no social obstructions with any fear of germs so I can do whatever I want. I'll touch the door handles of public bathrooms with my hands and come out just fine cause I still have a immune system that works.
It is almost hilarious how obsessive people are with cleanliness and germs when A: it exists all around us and B: your body handles 99% of it just fine.
In 2014 a similar study by researchers from the University of Leeds found that airborne germ counts were 27 times higher around jet air dryers in comparison with the air around paper towel dispensers.
Research lead Professor Mark Wilcox said: Next time you dry your hands in a public toilet using an electric hand dryer, you may be spreading bacteria without knowing it. You may also be splattered with bugs from other peoples hands.
These findings are important for understanding the ways in which bacteria spread, with the potential to transmit illness and disease.
The earlier study was funded by the European Tissue Symposium. A spokesman for Dyson said at the time: This research was commissioned by the paper towel industry and it's flawed.
"They have tested glove covered hands, which have been contaminated with unrealistically high levels of bacteria, and not washed."
Researchers have long known that warm air hand dryers can launch bacteria into the aircompared to dabbing with paper towels, which unleashes virtually none. But new jet air dryers, made by Dyson, are significantly more problematicthey launch far more viruses into the air, which linger for longer periods of time and reach much farther distances, researchers recently reported in the Journal of Applied Microbiology. This is particularly concerning because viruses, unlike many infectious bacteria, can easily maintain their infectiousness in the air and on surfaces, and just a few viral particles can spark an infection.
The results of this study suggest that in locations where hygiene and cross-infection considerations are paramount, such as healthcare settings and the food industry, the choice of hand-drying method should be considered carefully, the authors concluded.
...
By far, the jet dryer was the biggest viral spreader in all measurements.
Clumping the data from all six heights together, the Dyson produced 60 times more plaques than the warm air dryer and 1,300 times more than paper towels. Of the viruses launched by the jet dryer, 70 percent were at the height of a small childs face.
Looking across the distances tested, most of the jet dryer-launched viruses landed about 0.25 meters away. But at three meters, the number of plaque-forming viruses spread by the jet dryer was 500-fold greater than that from the warm air dryer (paper towels launched zero to this distance). In total across the distances, the jet dryer spread 20 times more viruses than the warm dryer and more than 190 times more than the paper towels.
With the air sampling data, the researchers looked at how long viruses lingered in the air after the drying methods were used. Fifteen minutes after a jet dryer blast, there were 50 times more viral particles in the air than after a warm air dryer and 100 times more than after paper towel use. The data also suggested that the jet dryer-launched viruses would float beyond the 15 minutes.
The things were already bad because it has a narrow opening so occasionally your hands bump it and inevitably touch another surface that poor hand washers have touched.
I miss those old towel hand dryers where you have to pull a loop of fabric down
I never get the debate over paper towels vs. air dryer. I wash my hands, shake off the drops, if necessary pat my hands on the side of my shirt, and walk off. They're dry within 10 seconds.
You probably already get like 50x more germs just by pushing the door on the way out anyways.
Plus viruses from when people cough and such. Blast dryers are one of the best things to become popular recently, makes drying hands so much better than the low power ones
This is why I open the door with paper towels and toss them to the floor if a waste bin isn't reachable or within throwing distance...yes I'm a monster.