Should have been 69.69 if you know what I mean
Not for that price bro.
70$ vs 60$ too.Saints Row > PS4, PS5, XBSS, XBSX, XB1, PC
TLOU Remake > PS5
Also 4 days retail tracking VS 1
But don't let me interrupt the narrative you're working with...
Saints row is a buggy mess and ripped apart in reviews...you think it sold well?Saints Row is available on 5 systems or more??
What a stupid comparison.
It will probably be both this and horizon or a triple pack with gran turismo for xmasConfirmed this will be the next box in game bundle with the PlayStation 5 replacing forbidden West.
That would be a an awesome bundle.It will probably be both this and horizon or a triple pack with gran turismo for xmas
The people who bought this game most likely are Gen Z who havent played the original gameIt seems the price gamble paid off for them.
It's good for the morale of the team that worked on it. So if you guys are reading - congrats on the solid work with the project.
As for ND management or whoever mandated it this way - yes market wise it was a good call, but a cash grab and an FU to loyal customers.
Hey man im not really into this remake either but why so bitter dude?half as many as Saints Row is still about 75% too many
Cause a third remake in 10 years at an ever increasing price tag is total loser shit by Sony. It's cynical as fuck, and just complete creative bankruptcy.Hey man im not really into this remake either but why so bitter here?
Seriously some fcked up people around here seems pissed with this news. Go find a new hobby.
Like i said earlier the people who bought this prob are Gen Z who never played the original game or remaster on ps4Cause a third remake in 10 years at an ever increasing price tag is total loser shit by Sony. It's cynical as fuck, and just complete creative bankruptcy.
They should fail, and badly.
It would be pretty awesome!That would be a an awesome bundle.
Yeah, nobody really cared about what they did with the legacy of thieves collection. 49.99 and a $10 upgrade path if you previously owned the game.Good to see the consumers speaking with their wallets. Unless a remake was literally done from the ground up, charging full price is ridiculous. Sony could've avoided all this bad press had they just made the game $49.99.
25k topsHow many copies did Saints Row sell?
Can't find it.
If Saints Row sold 2mil in 4 days for example.
1mil in one day isn't exactly a fail.
Like i said earlier the people who bought this prob are Gen Z who never played the original game or remaster on ps4
You know kids..teenagers...they are born everyday...cant really blame them for this..
A source would be nice.25k tops
The remaster is not 4 years old, it came out in 2014, so double that.Are you serious? They won't play a 4 year old remaster? Get outta here with that weird generation narrative - it's straight up cynical bullshit from Sony.
The remaster is not 4 years old, it came out in 2014, so double that.
Your post would make more sense if this release wasn't PlayStation 5 only. Saints Row was also released on PS4 and again it had more sales days.You were always the first one to post threads titled "80% of all copies sold on PS" or whatever whenever you posted a UK boxed charts thread but now suddenly Saint's Row sold double because it was available on Xbox??? Come on man
Last of us was always the most overrated game ever made tbh
I wouldn't know. Last time I played this game was on my old PS3 in 2013. I'm also not buying this but no need to lie about stuff that's easy to verify.So unplayable..... Even after the Pro updates..
People always go on about overrated this and underrated that, but I don't get it. Who decides if something was rated more or less than it should have been and how do we know what its actual rating should be? Who decides? The people that liked it too much? They people that hated it? What's the objective measure to see the rating a game should have?Last of us was always the most overrated game ever made tbh
Last of us was always the most overrated game ever made tbh
Last of us was always the most overrated game ever made tbh
Lie. Comon. The point stands - Sony wasn't forced to release this because "won't you think about the kids" or some weird other point.I wouldn't know. Last time I played this game was on my old PS3 in 2013. I'm also not buying this but no need to lie about stuff that's easy to verify.
I wonder if Factions will cost £69.99 at launch? I’m hyped for it but I have a feeling it will flop massively if they price it like that.
This ain't chief.It's still the best selling game for the week after a single day of sales being counted and only being on one platform.
But somehow this is being spun as a bad thing? People wanted this to fail so badly that they are inventing failure.
Nah, it's failed. It was always going to be number 1. There isn't another single release to compete with but it barely sold more than half of a critical failure that's buggy as shit and been getting panned online.It's still the best selling game for the week after a single day of sales being counted and only being on one platform.
But somehow this is being spun as a bad thing? People wanted this to fail so badly that they are inventing failure.
Sales threads always have bad takes.Half as many as Saints Row? That's... not good.
Sure, we don't know the digital split and all, but selling HALF of a horribly reviewed game, and a franchise with 5% of the prestige that TLOU should have is just horrible.
As I have been saying, not only this remake seemed utterly unecessary, but also the damage that TLOU 2 did on the franchise was gigantic, and its already starting to reflect on the sales of this remake.
I'm actually happy to see Sony getting the backlash it deserves by having butchered this franchise, even if this will sell much more than it should have. Now we wait a few weeks/months to see the extent of the damage that was done to the franchise because of the second entry.
Not only that, why would anyone want a game to fail? Especially one that look this good and bugs free.It's still the best selling game for the week after a single day of sales being counted and only being on one platform.
But somehow this is being spun as a bad thing? People wanted this to fail so badly that they are inventing failure.
Nah, it's failed. It was always going to be number 1. There isn't another single release to compete with but it barely sold more than half of a critical failure that's buggy as shit and been getting panned online.
It's embarrassing for Sony and naughty dog but exactly what it deserved at 70 pounds. Let us have our win
This ain't chief.