TemplaerDude
Member
Hope to keep winning.
He's not useless, he's still the fifth best QB in the league!no matter how good brady plays, people will still say he's old and useless.
They are all better than Brady at this point.
Specifically, the issue is 3 things:
1. Brady's deep ball is now awful
2. he gets gun shy if you get pressure on him
3. he's immobile
Plus he's more clutch.
What does that even mean. He was throwing the ball with such percision it was like a surgeon cutting a patient. Are there degrees of surgicalness?I've heard that many times before.. Are you just watching football for the first time this season? Lol..
i see today's loss made you take a step back and realize how wrong you wereI was really down on this team. When Brady was doing bad I gave up on them. Bill peeked in, watched more tape than usual, and turned the season around.
Personally, I think he's the best in NFL history.
What does that even mean. He was throwing the ball with such percision it was like a surgeon cutting a patient. Are there degrees of surgicalness?
And no, I stopped watching football when they started using "anemic" for offences.
Oh that offence was so bad it was like he didn't have properly functioning red blood cells
What does that even mean. He was throwing the ball with such percision it was like a surgeon cutting a patient. Are there degrees of surgicalness?
And no, I stopped watching football when they started using "anemic" for offences.
Oh that offence was so bad it was like he didn't have properly functioning red blood cells
Lol Brees and Luck.
I don't deny Rodgers is best right now, and Peyton is debatable, but those other two don't deserve to be mentioned with him.
Its like you dont understand words have more than one meaning.What does that even mean. He was throwing the ball with such percision it was like a surgeon cutting a patient. Are there degrees of surgicalness?
And no, I stopped watching football when they started using "anemic" for offences.
Oh that offence was so bad it was like he didn't have properly functioning red blood cells
a·ne·mic
əˈnēmik/Submit
adjective
lacking in color, spirit, or vitality.
synonyms: feeble, weak, insipid, wishy-washy, vapid, bland; More
if they do this in January and February then i'll be impressed, im a pats fan but this happens like every season, beasts in the regular season then choke in the playoffs
Peyton got the Welker curse now
defense is still garbage
What does that even mean. He was throwing the ball with such percision it was like a surgeon cutting a patient. Are there degrees of surgicalness?
And no, I stopped watching football when they started using "anemic" for offences.
Oh that offence was so bad it was like he didn't have properly functioning red blood cells
i see today's loss made you take a step back and realize how wrong you were
i'm proud of you brother!
Not really. Offensively, the only difference between then and recent years are the receivers, back when they had Moss and Welker. It's not like Cassel was hiding behind a great running game or something. He had to sling it, and he did.The "system" Cassel was in in 2008 is radically different then the system in place now. Cassel was playing with a team that was mostly intact following a perfect regular season and nearly won the super bowl. Ever slot was full of A+ talent.
That team is long since gone. There are still good players, but not nearly the talent they once had.
Not really. Offensively, the only difference between then and recent years are the receivers, back when they had Moss and Welker. It's not like Cassel was hiding behind a great running game or something. He had to sling it, and he did.
Usually it doesn't matter how talented your offense is -- when your star QB goes down, so does your team's season. Colts went from 10 wins to 2 without Peyton. For awhile, they looked like they might've went 0-16.
Brady goes down and you still have an 11 win team. That is very unusual for a team losing their franchise QB in the first game.
LeBron never had the benefit of illegally recorded video footage of other team's practices to know what coverages the defense would be playing in advance!
what?Offensively, the only difference between then and recent years are the receivers, back when they had Moss and Welker.
I love how average fans don't know every team in the NFL was doing this at the time.
The Patriots have always had an incredible o-line during Brady's run. Things only got shaky early during this season, and now it's been turned around.what?
they had an incredible offensive line too you know...
And you're acting like Moss and Welker aren't that much of an upgrade over what they have now.
Not really. Offensively, the only difference between then and recent years are the receivers, back when they had Moss and Welker. It's not like Cassel was hiding behind a great running game or something. He had to sling it, and he did.
Usually it doesn't matter how talented your offense is -- when your star QB goes down, so does your team's season. Colts went from 10 wins to 2 without Peyton. For awhile, they looked like they might've went 0-16.
Brady goes down and you still have an 11 win team. That is very unusual for a team losing their franchise QB in the first game.
lulz, is this what you tell yourself to make yourself feel better for rooting for cheaters?I love how average fans don't know every team in the NFL was doing this at the time.
lulz, is this what you tell yourself to make yourself feel better for rooting for cheaters?
Not talking about the sideline cameras, dude. Talking about stuff like when they recorded the Rams' 2001 super bowl walkthrough, then used that knowledge to have the D lined up perfectly for certain formations they'd seen in practice.
Goodell also said he was told by Walsh that the Patriots did not have a videotape of a walk-through practice of the St. Louis Rams before the 2002 Super Bowl. The Boston Herald had previously reported that such a tape existed, but Goodell said Tuesday he was able to verify that there is no such tape.
Can you provide proof to this? Because..
1)Montana
2)Brady
3)Manning
Deal with it.
Now. I'm talking greatest careers.Rodgers is better than Brady and Manning. Give Rodgers the Broncos and they go undefeated and wouldn't choke in the superbowl.
What the hell happened? After that KC game, the Pats and especially Tom Brady were being labeled as finished. Hell, there were pitchforks lined up, before that Bengals game. Well, since said game, the Pats are dropping 40 points every game and Brady is looking surgical out there. Not to mention they have a bionic monster at the TE position, who is matchup proof. I want some answers.
What does that even mean. He was throwing the ball with such percision it was like a surgeon cutting a patient. Are there degrees of surgicalness?
And no, I stopped watching football when they started using "anemic" for offences.
Oh that offence was so bad it was like he didn't have properly functioning red blood cells
They figured out their o-line problems.
That's all, Brady was always good, Gronk was always good, but it's really hard to toss balls when your o-line can't give you more than 1 second to look down field.
That and Vereen is a better RB than Ridley ever was, so is Grey.
The pats have always been my backup team to cheer for if the Seahawks fail. So God-Brady has my support.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-k97lSsDNv...h+unto+you%2C+Lo%2C+He+is+Full+Of+Himself.jpg
You're a Seahawks-Pats fan? Are you the devil?
AFC/NFC. It's not like dividing by 0, but still pretty bad. Go Pats!You're a Seahawks-Pats fan? Are you the devil?
1)Montana
2)Brady
3)Manning
Deal with it.
Surgical is now an adjective for quarterbacks?
Media overreaction after a few games in the NFL? Never!
You guys will never let this shit go huh.LeBron never had the benefit of illegally recorded video footage of other team's practices to know what coverages the defense would be playing in advance!