This, even my very very basic understanding of this has me face palming myself reading some of these posts.
Little Monser;241604043 said:Would be interesting to know, I always see posts talking about Nintendo stock and want in lol
At least there are a few posters in here that understand the market. Wish people actually read their posts though
This is honestly not that impressive. Nintendo stock was always going to jump back to their core value of 70 Billion. Investors are starving for options in the stock market and overvalueing Nintendo as a result. By the time FF7 Remake gets out the market cap of Sony will blow Nintendo away. Clearly we need to look at revenue to get a view on a company their financial health. With a dying 3DS and floundering Switch sales with no third party support,, there is noway Nintendo can keep this up
That Sony drop since 2000....yeesh lol
It's been pretty consistently in the best performing ten stocks per day for the past weeks. Sure you should get in when it's lower, but it's still a really safe stock. As long as firms keep employing Pachter, even an average GAFfer has a chance.Another classic gaf thread.
Rolls eyes.
First legit post in this threadPeople going full console warrior in this thread, I see.
After losing money for so many years I guess it'll take time for investors to regain confidence in the company. Sony also needs to get their shit together on their movies division.
I get what you mean but they do not "make more" though, market cap is something else, I believe it's the perceived value of the company's shares.
In terms of operating income for example, last fiscal year was 288,7 billion yen for Sony Corp (135,6 billion yen for PlayStation) and 29,3 billion yen for Nintendo.
This is honestly not that impressive. Nintendo stock was always going to jump back to their core value of 70 Billion. Investors are starving for options in the stock market and overvalueing Nintendo as a result. By the time FF7 Remake gets out the market cap of Sony will blow Nintendo away. Clearly we need to look at revenue to get a view on a company their financial health. With a dying 3DS and floundering Switch sales with no third party support,, there is noway Nintendo can keep this up
Nothing they're doing is working except gaming wise and if they fuck that up too then they're gone.
I swear some people here still living in the 2007-2012 era..... For example regarding Sony TV division
Sony Corp.'s resurgence in the premium TV market is starting to threaten the lead enjoyed by South Korea's Samsung Electronics Co. and LG Electronics Inc., industry data showed Sunday.
Wow, so many dumb takes on this news. Stick to videogames GAF.
Nintendo should buy Sony, who is doomed.
This is honestly not that impressive. Nintendo stock was always going to jump back to their core value of 70 Billion. Investors are starving for options in the stock market and overvalueing Nintendo as a result. By the time FF7 Remake gets out the market cap of Sony will blow Nintendo away. Clearly we need to look at revenue to get a view on a company their financial health. With a dying 3DS and floundering Switch sales with no third party support,, there is noway Nintendo can keep this up
How is Sony struggling? I thought they where turning things around? Did they go in the red again?They're still making TV's that nobody buys IIRC, and it's quite frankly remarkable that they can still be the tip of the spear in the likes of console VR when they're struggling so badly
Nintendo still did make more money in the end. Yes, their operating income is way lower, but their net profit is actually higher and that's what's important:
Sony 2016/2017 ~73,3 billion Yen
Nintendo 2016/2017 ~102,6 billion Yen
If we go by the market cap numbers only, it would require Nintendo to sell everything and then give that money to Sony (to buy them). Would basically be trading money.technically Nintendo has just more money than Sony, so technically they can buy them I guess
If we go by the market cap numbers only, it would require Nintendo to sell everything and then give that money to Sony (to buy them). Would basically be trading money.
Well i think they should sony is almost going undertechnically Nintendo has just more money than Sony, so technically they can buy them I guess
This is just completely inaccurate. Market cap is not correlated with growth at all. You may be thinking of p/e, peg, fv/ebitda, or like fifty other things, but you have it precisely backwards. Market caps are typically higher for lower growth companies because they are larger and their capitalizations are different. Which company has a larger market cap: Walmart or Snap? Who is growing faster?Market cap is how much a company is worth to investors. Having a high market cap indicates that investors believe the company is on a growth trajectory. This is how a company with relatively low revenues can end up with a higher market cap. Investors see a bright future for Nintendo.
The simplicity of Nintendos business is currently a strength for them. Their IP has proven to be incredibly strong, and their hardware is in high demand. The Switch shortage is temporary, and the SNES mini will be a massive hit and priced to reflect its high demand. It's hard not to see Why investors are confident in Nintendo.
A Sony investment is less promising. Sure they've sold a lot of consoles, but margins are shrinking and their operating costs are higher. Not to mention segments of their business is struggling.
Uhm I wonder how many of the ones bothering with a reply have a clear idea of what the market cap, volume and revenue are....
The stock is solid, but to say that Nintendo is worth as much as sony.....
This is only one metric of valuation. Why do we only look at the value of equity in the two companies? Why not enterprise value?
Operating income is how businesses health is judged.
Also how does Nintendo doing better stock translate to Sony doing bad?
This is just completely inaccurate. Market cap is not correlated with growth at all. You may be thinking of p/e, peg, fv/ebitda, or like fifty other things, but you have it precisely backwards. Market caps are typically higher for lower growth companies because they are larger and their capitalizations are different. Which company has a larger market cap: Walmart or Snap? Who is growing faster?
This thread. Yikes.
This is only one metric of valuation. Why do we only look at the value of equity in the two companies? Why not enterprise value?
This is just completely inaccurate. Market cap is not correlated with growth at all. You may be thinking of p/e, peg, fv/ebitda, or like fifty other things, but you have it precisely backwards. Market caps are typically higher for lower growth companies because they are larger and their capitalizations are different. Which company has a larger market cap: Walmart or Snap? Who is growing faster?
This thread. Yikes.
Net cash is subtracted from equity value to get to enterprise value. But no, their cash stockpile is a fraction of their equity value even if you didn't know how to calculate numbers and were just posting on a message board to irritate bankers.Wouldn't this be even more Nintendo's favour? Their warchest is staggering.
The rise is stock price is a reflection of investors expectation of future growth. They are investing because they expect to see ROI on their investment. It's pretty simple and inarguable.
No marketcap doesn't equal growth. But a rising market cap means investors are expecting growth.
This is honestly not that impressive. Nintendo stock was always going to jump back to their core value of 70 Billion. Investors are starving for options in the stock market and overvalueing Nintendo as a result. By the time FF7 Remake gets out the market cap of Sony will blow Nintendo away. Clearly we need to look at revenue to get a view on a company their financial health. With a dying 3DS and floundering Switch sales with no third party support,, there is noway Nintendo can keep this up
Net cash is subtracted from equity value to get to enterprise value. But no, their cash stockpile is a fraction of their equity value even if you didn't know how to calculate numbers and were just posting on a message board to irritate bankers.
I mean you can't say this. There are multiple means of growing total shareholder returns without revenue growth. Earnings growth can be manufactured; capital can be returned to shareholders.
Market capitalization is the most simplified way to calculate a company's size, value and, consequently, its growth and risk outlook
Read more: What's the difference between enterprise value and market capitalization? | Investopedia http://www.investopedia.com/ask/ans...e-and-market-capitalization.asp#ixzz4kpXnUpcU
can Nintendo buy Sony now?
Stock market loves video game companies. Just completely sky high valuations.
I guess Sony should stop doing so much. So little reward for so much effort.
The 3DS and PS4 are in no way comparable. One is significantly more lucrative than the other, and if that isn't the case that's a big problem
Net cash is subtracted from equity value to get to enterprise value.
the Metroid effect
investors are excited about Prime 4
that's why Nintendo released the Switch "a handheld" as lucrative as a home console
big reason, why Nintendo is valued so high right now
more expensive games and accessories, dlc and payed online
economy of scale and cheaper development due to just one platform
still the potential for a 100m installbase (combining home console and handheld market)
Switch is just the perfect thing to do for Nintendo