MW2019 didn't have it on PS4.Yes. That's been a thing for a long time in a lot of shooters. COD I played at 120 fov.
RT is too much a resource hog for consoles anyhow.
Give me more frames
I have a nice beefy PC and I never use RT I want 4k 160fps over anything ray tracedI've never felt compelled to trade frames for RT on PC either, personally. Just isn't worth it. Maybe one day when I can buy a new GPU and not put a second mortgage on my house then perhaps, but until then it isn't a fair trade, imo.
I have a nice beefy PC and I never use RT I want 4k 160fps over anything ray traced
Yah definitely. If their “non-decent” game engine cant get RT and 4K60fps on console but can work on PC, then offer it on PC and not console, we agree this make sense.This is ubisoft. They can't make any decent game engine. They have w a few shit ones with RT glued into them.
I have a nice beefy PC and I never use RT I want 4k 160fps over anything ray traced
Monitor or TV?1440p looks like garbage to me on my 4K screen. Lowest res. I'd use is ~1800p or DLSS which upscales from lower resolutions, but still looks way better than 1440p.
I've been enjoying way to many crisp native 4K games lately to not notice a difference.
3090 FTWI thought this was funny:
Which would mean that you wouldn't be able to play the game with HD textures with one of the most sought after GPUs on the market today (the RTX 3080). Ubisoft obviously likes to joke around.
I'm wondering if this would be the first game where you'd see higher quality textures on consoles than PCs with more powerful GPUs but with <11GB VRAM (3070 Ti, 3080).I thought this was funny:
Which would mean that you wouldn't be able to play the game with HD textures with one of the most sought after GPUs on the market today (the RTX 3080). Ubisoft obviously likes to joke around.
I guess that not having to deal with ubisoft games can be considered a win yeahAnother win for Nintendo.
Why are you being a hyperbolic drama queen?My point still stands, next-gen is a joke, a complete disappointment for me. I think after this generation I'm done with gaming for good.
Yep. Even when I eventually build a gaming PC, RT is not worth the hit to frames. Now, if I get 200 frames and RT drops it to 150? Sure. But 120 frames down to 50-60 frames? Nah.RT is too much a resource hog for consoles anyhow.
Give me more frames
It's an AMD sponsored title and their top 4 this gen, 6900xt, 6800xt, 6800, 6700xt, all have 12GB or more vRAM.I thought this was funny:
Which would mean that you wouldn't be able to play the game with HD textures with one of the most sought after GPUs on the market today (the RTX 3080). Ubisoft obviously likes to joke around.
I thought this was funny:
Which would mean that you wouldn't be able to play the game with HD textures with one of the most sought after GPUs on the market today (the RTX 3080). Ubisoft obviously likes to joke around.
Add crysis 3 and crysis 2 remasters RT only PCPS5 and XSX games with RT.
- Doom Eternal
- Spiderman
- Ratchet
- Control
- Deathloop
- Call of Duty Cold War
- Watch Dogs
- Devil May Cry 5
PS5 and XSX port of PC games without RT:
- Far Cry 6.