• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Usage Based Billing approved, Canadian govt shoots it down, more developments to come

Lostconfused said:
I checked who my MP was and it turns out it was some conservative. I thought I was living in a region that voted Liberal, I had no idea. Don't know what to believe in anymore.

If you email him this is the likely response:

"Our information show's that in the last federal election you voted Liberal, so go fuck yourself."
 
Riptwo said:
So wait, Bell implement restrictive, anemic caps on their users--making competing video services like Netflix less than attractive--yet allow cap free viewing of their own online video system, and you claim that those calling for net neutrality are being hyperbolic?

Other than CTV.ca, which is peripherally related by being owned by the same conglomerate, is there a Bell owned streaming service?

Besides, look at that image. I just don't see a reality where I'll have to pay extra to go to Amazon.ca or BBC.co.uk. Maybe I'm being naive, but I think that's just silly.
 
Oh wow... i was just thinking of switching to Teksavvy in march, but for Cable.

How much will 25GB on these new companies cost? I think 9.95-14.95 would be KIND of fair to give to customers. How will UBB affect overage caps? I know people were on bell specifically because their overage capped at $30. Meaning they could get unlimited fast internet for about $80-$100 a month. Is that affected in any way with this new legislation?

Will they be offering higer bandwidth tiers? Will they be allowed to offer the the same up to 80GB bandwidth insurance Bell offers to their own customers?

The average user doesn't use more than 10-15GBs a month to be honest, but people who post here aren't your average user. Netflix and other streaming download services. Game demo's, MMO's etc are getting larger. Patches for games, windows and even Anti-virus programs are getting larger as well. Not to mention if you do A Lot of video calling. Even 60GB isn't enough.

I personally don't watch actual TV, and I spend 60% of my time on the internet either on Youtube, doing video calling with friends and watching shows online. That alone eats up alot of bandwidth. I'm usually just BARELY under cap @ 125GBs and That's with me restricting myself. I don't download torrents, I don't download movies or music.
 
Deadly said:
Playing games online doesn't use up much bandwidth

I dunno I guess it varies between locations and games but when I monitor the bandwidth I'm using, it is usually around 80-120 MB every hour.

EDIT: Plus it doesn't help that I have roommates using the internet simultaneously.
 
So how does bell going to offer Fios like/Fiber net affect this whole deal now anyway? Seeing as thats going under the radar to.
 
The UBB for cable won't be the same as the UBB for DSL. That doesn't have any details on it yet. Who knows it could be reasonable, but I'm probably too optimistic.
 
criesofthepast said:
Do you live alone? Try living in a house with 3-5 other people. 60GB is jack shit.

Yep. 4 here, and the idea of having to share 25gb between us is ridiculous
 
This thread actually convinced me to download a bandwidth monitor so that I have an idea of how many gigs I burn through per month.

What software do you guys use?
 
I have a question: so was it like some ISPs went to regulatory body to get OK for this idea, and they got it? Won't there be any other ISP that will try to get more clients by offering more cap/no cap at all?
 
Castor Krieg said:
I have a question: so was it like some ISPs went to regulatory body to get OK for this idea, and they got it? Won't there be any other ISP that will try to get more clients by offering more cap/no cap at all?
The issue is that they would have to run all their own cable to do so, since the major telecom companies own almost all the lines that are currently there.

Since that's very expensive, Canada's government basically granted a free monopoly to the telecom companies.
 
SolarPowered said:
This thread actually convinced me to download a bandwidth monitor so that I have an idea of how many gigs I burn through per month.

What software do you guys use?

I need something like this too, for a D-Link Wireless router. Any suggestions?
 
Castor Krieg said:
I have a question: so was it like some ISPs went to regulatory body to get OK for this idea, and they got it? Won't there be any other ISP that will try to get more clients by offering more cap/no cap at all?

Yup Bell went to the CRTC to get approval. Rogers is the only other major competitor. Being in Canada they're more likely just to match what Bell did rather than take a competitive advantage.
 
Canadian cities really need to start building their own networks, keeping ownership of them, and leasing access to service providers to avoid crap like this.
 
Magnus said:
Are caps just completely non-existent on every ISP's plans in the States? Both home internet and mobile?
My ISP has a cap of 300 GB per month, which is so large that I can't see myself hitting it.
 
Nirolak said:
My ISP has a cap of 300 GB per month, which is so large that I can't see myself hitting it.
My average usage is 300GB. I guess this is what happens when you have 4 brothers, 4 PCs with 2 of them steam-friendly, 2 PS3, 4 iPhones and 1 Xbox360; with subscription to Netflix.

I'm so fucked...
 
I'm not in favour of UBB at all, but it seems worth pointing out that Teksavvy etc. are able to lease unbundled loops from Bell i.e. Bell runs the FTTN (Fiber-to-the-node) network, and resellers lease the DSL loops that run from those nodes to the home. When they do that, they are not subject to UBB charges. This is coming straight from Bell media relations.

Whether that is financially viable, I am not at all sure. Another problem is that those unbundled loops don't always reach people's homes, so resellers are forced to use Bell's lines, since they are the only available.
 
Emailed my Conservative MP Peter Goldring(vomited in my mouth abit there)... and used http://openmedia.ca/meter to send an email to some dick called "Industry Minister Tony Clement", while signing the petition awhile back. Now to leave a bag of feces and set it on fire somewhere...
 
LakeEarth said:
Goddamn it. 25gb?!? What is that, 3-4 HD movies off of Netflix?

Which creates an interesting situation. Say you want to watch Sixteen Candles. If you stream it legally from Netflix, you're basically paying twice for it (Netflix subscription + ISP sub).

If you pirate it you only pay once.

The ISPs win either way. :/
 
I'm surprised someone hasn't gone Gonzo and held a public wake for broadband in Canada. Surely you could get a priest who is hip to technology to hold the service. :p
 
I'm almost glad I haven't been hip to DD-services and haven't really migrated my lifestyle to DD (Steam, Netflix, etc.), so I'll have less of a system shock than most if this goes live and sticks for the coming years. But man, even I feel threatened at 25gb/month.

I can only imagine how hurt and furious some of you are who DO use those services on a much more regular basis.

This fucking sucks.
 
This is so fucked. A regret of me moving from the States to Canada six years ago, LOL.

On another note, I emailed the local MP here.
 
Jinaar said:
Emailed my Conservative MP Peter Goldring(vomited in my mouth abit there)... and used http://openmedia.ca/meter to send an email to some dick called "Industry Minister Tony Clement", while signing the petition awhile back. Now to leave a bag of feces and set it on fire somewhere...

Over 60K signed the petition? I could have sworn it was 50K just a few hours ago... now that's momentum.
 
Zombie James said:
Over 60K signed the petition? I could have sworn it was 50K just a few hours ago... now that's momentum.

I wish I had even the smallest amount of confidence that it will make a difference.

Years of wasting my vote on NDP has kind of left me broken and cynical. :/
 
Om3ga said:
Oh wow... i was just thinking of switching to Teksavvy in march, but for Cable.

How much will 25GB on these new companies cost? I think 9.95-14.95 would be KIND of fair to give to customers. How will UBB affect overage caps? I know people were on bell specifically because their overage capped at $30. Meaning they could get unlimited fast internet for about $80-$100 a month. Is that affected in any way with this new legislation?

Will they be offering higer bandwidth tiers? Will they be allowed to offer the the same up to 80GB bandwidth insurance Bell offers to their own customers?

The average user doesn't use more than 10-15GBs a month to be honest, but people who post here aren't your average user. Netflix and other streaming download services. Game demo's, MMO's etc are getting larger. Patches for games, windows and even Anti-virus programs are getting larger as well. Not to mention if you do A Lot of video calling. Even 60GB isn't enough.

I personally don't watch actual TV, and I spend 60% of my time on the internet either on Youtube, doing video calling with friends and watching shows online. That alone eats up alot of bandwidth. I'm usually just BARELY under cap @ 125GBs and That's with me restricting myself. I don't download torrents, I don't download movies or music.

For those who are unaware pricing is roughly:

Bell: $50ish a month for 12-16mbps down, 1mbps up. Cap is 50-75gb with a fee from 1-2$ per gb over the cap max of $60 (recently changed from $30 as of Jan 2010).

Rogers: $60ish a month for 15mbps down, 1 up. Cap is 80 gb. $1.50 for each gb over up to $50 I believe.


I just got a letter from bell in the mail saying:

Dear <me>,
Effective MArch 2011, there will be a change to your usage-based billing plan. An extreme usage fee of $1.00 per GB for usage exceeding 300GB per month will apply.
...
If you wish to modify or cancel your service as a result of this change, please call...

Sincerely,
Senior VP of Customer Service


To add, neither bell or rogers websites run smoothly. I recently switched from Bell to Tek Savvy. I'm still getting billed by Bell, when I called them their response was "yeah, our online billing is essentially broken..." and credited me my money back. Imagine how our actual internet service will be in a few years from now once TS and others will have to bill us the same way. Not to mention they can lower the caps and raise the fees whenever they like.
 
Magnus said:
Are caps just completely non-existent on every ISP's plans in the States? Both home internet and mobile?

The biggest cable provider (Comcast) has a 250GB cap. A lot of regional cable co's probably also have 100-250GB caps. I'm not sure how often or strictly they're enforced, but they exist in the legalese. This will all change dramatically (for the worse) very soon. Most markets are monopolized, and every cable co is chomping at the bit to get away with unreasonably low caps and paid use. Mobile is pretty horrible. AT&T have no unlimited plan, Verizon will most likely drop theirs sometime this year, and T-Mobile throttles their unlimited plan to sub-dialup modem speeds after 5GB. Not sure what Sprint does, their coverage is horrible outside the most major of metros.
 
Northern Telephone is the Division of Bell Aliant in Northern Ontario. They are the only option for a large area here. The current cap is set at 35 GB, but I don't think it is ever enforced. I know that I should have gone over it at some point by now. As bad as telecommunications are in the cities of this country, the rural areas are even worse. There have been no substantial speed upgrades to our service here in over six years. It has been 5mbps down and 1mbps up since DSL was introduced to the area.

Luckily, my MP, Charlie Angus, is seemingly one of the more outspoken on the subject. Unfortunately he represents a part of the country full of old people who don't give a shit about this. A representative of his is coming to my workplace tomorrow, hopefully they could suggest some more offices to send letters to or something.
 
Reallink said:
The biggest cable provider (Comcast) has a 250GB cap. A lot of regional cable co's probably also have 100-250GB caps. I'm not sure how often they are enforced, but they exist in the legalese. Mobile is a lot worse. AT&T have no unlimited plan, Verizon will most likely drop theirs sometime this year, and T-Mobile throttles their unlimited plan to sub-dialup modem speeds after 5GB. Not sure what Sprint does.

We don't have mobile unlimited data either, just 100mb, 500mb, 1gb, 6gb. We do have unlimited sms, mms.
 
Sending a letter to my MP about this. Obviously none of this will make much of a difference, but still it should be done.

Kind of hard to sound civilized about this. I keep resisting the urge to throw in 'cunt' every 5 words.
 
It's rather unfortunate. I'm currently living at my parents place with teksavvy and use about 120GB a month. When I move out (in March actually hah) I'm going to have to switch to Cogeco. With either company the prices will be similiar but the downstream on cogecos plans are much higher.

I'm sickened by the lack of media attention about this whole thing, and the failure of the media to properly explain it when they do focus on it. Not surprised by the CRTC though after the WIND controversy.
 
Super_Chicken said:
I just got a letter from bell in the mail saying:

Dear <me>,
Effective MArch 2011, there will be a change to your usage-based billing plan. An extreme usage fee of $1.00 per GB for usage exceeding 300GB per month will apply.
...
If you wish to modify or cancel your service as a result of this change, please call...

Sincerely,
Senior VP of Customer Service
I wonder if this means they are upping the cap to 300.
 
Zombie James said:
Unless you go with Wind or Mobilicity.
last i checked Wind was usable in a very small area. They hopefully improved but when I looked the phone would work in "Vancouver" as in the actual city of Vancouver not the handful surrounding it.
 
dream said:
Which creates an interesting situation. Say you want to watch Sixteen Candles. If you stream it legally from Netflix, you're basically paying twice for it (Netflix subscription + ISP sub).

If you pirate it you only pay once.

The ISPs win either way. :/

Yeah, try pirate Sixteen Candles at 60 KB/s after throttling.

No, you'll instead rent it on Bell Fib!
 
I'm trying to comprehend this but I'm still not entirely sure. Does this apply to every single ISP in Canada? Is there any ISp who will provide caps higher than 25gb?
 
I emailed the Liberal MP in my area. I told her if they don't start openly stating UBB is wrong and that it must by struck down, I won't vote Liberal ever again. In fact, the Pirate Party of Canada has my vote, but since they don't have a candidate in my area, I'm going to have to vote NDP. I've never voted NDP.

I hate mega corps trying to control the intertubes. I hate stupid politicians even more who don't understand just how important the Internet is.
 
Sigh... so disappointed that such bullshit is perpetrated in this great country. We deserve better than what we get.
 
Maddog said:
I'm trying to comprehend this but I'm still not entirely sure. Does this apply to every single ISP in Canada? Is there any ISp who will provide caps higher than 25gb?

They can, and will, provide a cap higher than 25gb. However, they'll have to raise the price of your subscription or contract.

Bell and any cable provider are still able to offer the services without charging for bandwidth usage. However, third party cable provider like Tekksavy will get charged for UBB later this year, too.
 
Top Bottom