• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

******* vs. David Jaffe - Meltdown

GO JAFFE GO GO GO

Put those ****ers in a body bag. Joystick is truly scraping the bottom of the blogging barrel. Well, maybe go_nintendo.
 
Madman said:
Let me ask, where is John Carmack and Will Wright? Are they here telling us about their next project? Are they giving insights into why problems occured in their games? Are they doing their best to keep in touch with the community? No, they aren't. Jaffe would come here and tell everyone what is up. He kept in touch with us on a regular basis and when you look at Jaffe when people aren't being dicks to him he's cool. But, every time he posted here or said anything anywhere, all the haters would of what they could to drive him away. Well, they did their job. Now, what other developer is actively talking to us right now? Denis Dyack and...? And given the way everyone is insulting to him (like Jaffe, people can't just disagree with his opinion, they have to be assholes about it) he probably won't stick around forever either. So, where's Carmack or pretty much every other major developer? Cause they sure as shit aren't openly posting here.

You're kidding, right? Just because Carmack and Wright don't post on GAF, doesn't mean they aren't open about their projects or open with the gaming community. Carmack has historically been one of the most open developers out there. Countless times Carmack has interacted with the gaming community through the development of the Quake games on Slashdot. Wright talks to the gaming community all the time about game design, his thoughts going forward vs what he's done in the past. There's other forums out there, you know.
 
bananabread said:
1. Jaffe goes back and fixes bug in a game close to release
2. Everyone happy
3. Banned site posts analogy comparing Jaffe to a small girl who is unwilling to let go of her prized possession because she just loves it that much
4: Jaffe misses the point
5. Jaffe: "HURGHALURGALURGHAF*CK"
6. NeoGAF: "Ahahahah this guy is amazing, Hi5 Jaffe!"

Where in the above scenario between Jaffe completely missing the point of the article and then getting high-fives from GAF does he do something completely awesome? The banned site is a pretty awful website, but to anyone with a basic understanding of metaphor they really don't seem to have done anything wrong and were in fact saying something positive about Jaffe and Calling All Cars.

Seems to me he just felt that his manhood had been threatened by the little girl remarks and the RED MIST came down and then he started typing angrily on the internet.
They said he is a little girl and his game is garage bin quality. The metaphor was not meant to be positive.
 
bananabread said:
1. Jaffe goes back and fixes bug in a game close to release
2. Everyone happy
3. Banned site posts analogy comparing Jaffe to a small girl who is unwilling to let go of her prized possession because she just loves it that much
4: Jaffe misses the point
5. Jaffe: "HURGHALURGALURGHAF*CK"
6. NeoGAF: "Ahahahah this guy is amazing, Hi5 Jaffe!"

Where in the above scenario between Jaffe completely missing the point of the article and then getting high-fives from GAF does he do something completely awesome? The banned site is a pretty awful website, but to anyone with a basic understanding of metaphor they really don't seem to have done anything wrong and were in fact saying something positive about Jaffe and Calling All Cars.

Seems to me he just felt that his manhood had been threatened by the little girl remarks and the RED MIST came down and then he started typing angrily on the internet.

Uh, maybe if said little girl was holding on to it to re-sew the button eyes on so the person who buys it will be happier with it.

I really don't see how the analogy can be taken in a non-insulting way.
 
francis.jpg


FirstInHell said:
That is 100% correct. There are plenty of other good games out there. Why should this guy be rewarded for this type of behavior with my money? I have no intention of ever bothering with any game Jaffe produces because I don't like how he conducts himself and his persona annoys me. His next game could be lauded as the second coming and receive straight 10s and I would have no interest in it. He is that abrasive.

...

batemantn8az1.gif
 
The problem here is videogames journalism that is very sucky and unprofessional.

What Joy.stick was impying in their article is completely ridiculous. It sounded like a proof they don't really understand how videogames are made and what is the reality of this industry. I understand why their name is banned from here. They've been stupidly judgmental toward Jaffe.

Now people reacting bad to that Jaffe answer or reporting this shit as a news (hello Wired!) are equally shamefull.
Jaffe is just a guy with a blog. It only happens that his job is making games. He can talk about whatever the hell he wants. His reaction there (while being a bit too intense maybe) is totally justified and we should all leave it at that.

I can't such stupidity are making videogame news. Videogames journalist should leave the community stuff aside and do their own thing. They read too much GAF, they read to many blogs and are creating stupidly useless sensationalism with a non-news.

This journalistic style also slowing the process of making this industry more respected and more mature.
 
bananabread said:
1. Jaffe goes back and fixes bug in a game close to release
2. Everyone happy
3. Banned site posts analogy comparing Jaffe to a small girl who is unwilling to let go of her prized possession because she just loves it that much
4: Jaffe misses the point
5. Jaffe: "HURGHALURGALURGHAF*CK"
6. NeoGAF: "Ahahahah this guy is amazing, Hi5 Jaffe!"

Where in the above scenario between Jaffe completely missing the point of the article and then getting high-fives from GAF does he do something completely awesome? The banned site is a pretty awful website, but to anyone with a basic understanding of metaphor they really don't seem to have done anything wrong and were in fact saying something positive about Jaffe and Calling All Cars.

Seems to me he just felt that his manhood had been threatened by the little girl remarks and the RED MIST came down and then he started typing angrily on the internet.

you might be used to be called little girl, but he might not appreciate it. Considering every other article that joycrap writes, i find it hard to believe that explanation.

Not to mention that crying like little girl has been taken from NeoGAF, which is just one of the reason joycrap will stay banned here...
 
distrbnce said:
So why don't you tell us how he conducts himself?

He seems like a pretty humble guy to me. God forbid he have an opinion and a voice. Just hope it jives with Mr. FirstInHell: Morality Squad.

Profanity aside, do you think it is rational for a grown man to lose it and throw a tantrum when an internet website makes a comment about him?

Look at his blog. Is the profanity necessary? Every other word is profane. It reads as if it is written by a 10 year old who just learned the f-word.

I like the way he insults his focus testers because they do not know how to play his game

9:36- Jesus...this one guy on the right screen is so ****ing stoned...he's like 40 and at a focus test on a wed morning....he prob is a stoner...cause he has NO CLUE how to play this game!

1:49- Moving to split screen...man tester #5 is a ****ing dolt!!! What the hell?!?! He is just driving in circles...not even playing the game...is that ****ing spit drooling out of his stupid ****ing mouth!?!?! Ahem,well...anyway.... :)
 
Ranger X said:
The problem here is videogames journalism that is very sucky and unprofessional.

What Joy.stick was impying in their article is completely ridiculous. It sounded like a proof they don't really understand how videogames are made and what is the reality of this industry. I understand why their name is banned from here. They've been stupidly judgmental toward Jaffe.

Now people reacting bad to that Jaffe answer or reporting this shit as a news (hello Wired!) are equally shamefull.
Jaffe is just a guy with a blog. It only happens that his job is making games. He can talk about whatever the hell he wants. His reaction there (while being a bit too intense maybe) is totally justified and we should all leave it at that.

I can't such stupidity are making videogame news. Videogames journalist should leave the community stuff aside and do their own thing. They read too much GAF, they read to many blogs and are creating stupidly useless sensationalism with a non-news.

This journalistic style also slowing the process of making this industry more respected and more mature.

Other parts of the entertainment industry have similar drama all the time. C'mon, Hollywood, anyone? How about the music industry with east coast vs west coast?

Joy.stick is a blog. Yes, they are cheese, yes they are unprofessional and yes, they are relentlessly in attack mode, but they are a gaming tabloid. People read it for the humor that goes with the posting. There's no shame in any of this - be it Jaffe, Joy.stick or Wired. It's drama. So what? Laugh about it. It's not like videogame news was any more mature before. Daily Radar anyone? GamePro?
 
nerbo said:
You're kidding, right? Just because Carmack and Wright don't post on GAF, doesn't mean they aren't open about their projects or open with the gaming community. Carmack has historically been one of the most open developers out there. Countless times Carmack has interacted with the gaming community through the development of the Quake games on Slashdot. Wright talks to the gaming community all the time about game design, his thoughts going forward vs what he's done in the past. There's other forums out there, you know.

They aren't posting here. If everyone feels it's ok for all the devs to not post here and don't care aboput them doing that. then that's their choice. But Jaffe was one of the few major developers that come around here and actually try to keep in contact on a consistent basis. He was honest, straight forward, and tried to keep in contact with the community. Most other major developers don't and if they do, it tends ot be very cookie cutter remarks and responses.
 
Joy.stick has made a good living chumming the water with badly worded metaphors and ridiculous opinions.

Penny Arcade has bit before, hell GAF has bit many times, and now Jaffe goes sailing up onto the deck with a big hook in his mouth.

"Sensationalist blog causes lame controversy", our top story at 11.
 
Madman said:
They said he is a little girl and his game is garage bin quality. The metaphor was not meant to be positive.

It was a pretty poor analogy to choose, I'll give you that. They probably should have qualified the statement as well, although they probably didn't realise what sort of a reaction it would cause if people missed the point.

If they'd said "one of a kind Kratos action figure with over 48 phrases spoken by Mac Daddy Chad Wardenn" instead of "doll", and "auctioned off for millions of dollars" instead of "garage sale", the meaning would have remained exactly the same.
 
FirstInHell said:
You must be a riot to hang out with. Jaffe overdoes his schtick a bit, but you're way off in the other direction. Not buying a game because of "the way one of the developers conducts himself"? ****
 
Madman said:
They aren't posting here. If everyone feels it's ok for all the devs to not post here and don't care aboput them doing that. then that's their choice. But Jaffe was one of the few major developers that come around here and actually try to keep in contact on a consistent basis. He was honest, straight forward, and tried to keep in contact with the community. Most other major developers don't and if they do, it tends ot be very cookie cutter remarks and responses.

That's cool, but he's still just another human being and when it comes right down to it, Jaffe receives the same treatment here that any other GAF poster would receive. What's unfair in that?

This is a fun gaming forum and all, but it isn't and never has been 'professional' by any means. I don't know what you expect.
 
FirstInHell said:
Profanity aside, do you think it is rational for a grown man to lose it and throw a tantrum when an internet website makes a comment about him?

Look at his blog. Is the profanity necessary? Every other word is profane. It reads as if it is written by a 10 year old who just learned the f-word.

I like the way he insults his focus testers because they do not know how to play his game

I don't see it as a tantrum, I see it as a response. Here he is doing something FOR THE FANS and they try to be cocksmears about it.

Who gives three shits of it's "necessary"? It's his personal ****ing blog and it certainly doesn't affect his games.

I like the way he talks like he's one of my friends.

You know, you're really acting like an old lady. (hey, just an analogy)
 
nerbo said:
Other parts of the entertainment industry have similar drama all the time. C'mon, Hollywood, anyone? How about the music industry with east coast vs west coast?

Joy.stick is a blog. Yes, they are cheese, yes they are unprofessional and yes, they are relentlessly in attack mode, but they are a gaming tabloid. People read it for the humor that goes with the posting. There's no shame in any of this - be it Jaffe, Joy.stick or Wired. It's drama. So what? Laugh about it. It's not like videogame news was any more mature before. Daily Radar anyone? GamePro?

I agree but i am of this point of view that we need to make an extra effort for videogames to at least reach the status of respect music and movies have. Videogames are having a greater image problem than those 2 other medias and this industry is young. Drama for fun about movies and music isn't as damageable as drama for fun about videogames in the mean that it keep our image problems in good shape...
 
maybe joy-stiq's analogy was a poor choice given how fragile jaffe's psyche seems to be, but other than that it was a perfectly fine story.

but jaffe reacted like a mental patient off his meds and he comes off like a grade-A asshole.

it was funny though :lol ...
 
I think that to say Jaffe is a genius is a bit of a stretch, twisted metal black? hell God of War is just absolutely fantastic, if you hadn't played Shenmue previously. I understand why people are bring in Dyackinto this, from reading here its like everyone has a real hard on for insulting someone who wants to have big ideas creating their game (oh noes ambitious ideas FTL, shut up and make it how i wants it NOOB) but has trouble articulating themselves in a way that they find acceptable. Jaffe comes across as a boor, anyone who applauds him for that whilst attacking Dyack when he might come across as over reaching and not necessarily grounded is unfair.
 
bananabread said:
It was a pretty poor analogy to choose, I'll give you that. They probably should have qualified the statement as well, although they probably didn't realise what sort of a reaction it would cause if people missed the point.

If they'd said "one of a kind Kratos action figure with over 48 phrases spoken by Mac Daddy Chad Wardenn" instead of "doll", and "auctioned off for millions of dollars" instead of "garage sale", the meaning would have remained exactly the same.
You are right. It would have been the same. Minus the whole insulting and character degrading part. They weren't trying to be philosophical. They were trying to be insulting.

Please, anyone trying to say that ******* (notice how I can't even say the name) was trying to be completely professional and phiosophical should really consider the source. They were trying to insult him. Not make some intelligent point with deep meaning.
 
FirstInHell said:
You are completely missing the point and have decided to selectively pick out parts of what I said to fit your "ownage" me.

Cursing has nothing to do with my opinion as a whole. Are you completely unaware of how Jaffe conducts himself? Are you legitimately surprised that people would not want to join in on the Jaffe Circle Jerk thread Part 1,207 at GAF?
:lol My "ownage" of you? You miss the point completely. I was just trying to figure out if the swearing is what really pissed you off. Now it's clear that you're really just mad because he's not a developer who's just a PR suit who never does anything outside of advertising the game.
 
a.wd said:
I think that to say Jaffe is a genius is a bit of a stretch, twisted metal black? hell God of War is just absolutely fantastic, if you hadn't played Shenmue previously.

Lolz, Shenmue is unplayable guttertrash when compared to God Of War.
 
Madman said:
You are right. It would have been the same. Minus the whole insulting and character degrading part. They weren't trying to be philosophical. They were trying to be insulting.

Please, anyone trying to say that ******* (notice how I can't even say the name) was trying to be completely professional and phiosophical should really consider the source. They were trying to insult him. Not make some intelligent point with deep meaning.

This seems quite obvious, but for some reason it still needed to be said.
 
a.wd said:
I think that to say Jaffe is a genius is a bit of a stretch, twisted metal black? hell God of War is just absolutely fantastic, if you hadn't played Shenmue previously.

What does GoW even have to do with Shenmue. They're about as different as you can get.
 
Ranger X said:
I agree but i am of this point of view that we need to make an extra effort for videogames to at least reach the status of respect music and movies have. Videogames are having a greater image problem than those 2 other medias and this industry is young. Drama for fun about movies and music isn't as damageable as drama for fun about videogames in the mean that it keep our image problems in good shape...

The more the gaming industry has to worry and police it's own image, the more it will become like Hollywood. That's not a good thing.

If the gaming industry is reduced to worrying about damage control at every turn, it will never earn any respect. As with any medium, freedom of expression should be paramount, regardless of how crude it may be. How can one recognize game development as an art form and worry about it's image being acceptable? The idea has always been to push the boundaries further. The moment we do otherwise is the moment it starts to crash.
 
I like Jaffe, but Jaffe going "dark" (if he does) is a good thing. Right now, he's taking away from his own game. We talk about Jaffe more than we talk about Calling All Cars. This is not the way it should be. I'm not saying you can't get your face out there and show who you are to the industry.

What I am saying is, while you have a product you're getting ready to put out there and hope people buy, you need to promote the product and only your product. Don't fight with websites, don't do some of the shit he's done. Because when something ****s up, it'll all fall right on him and directly on him.

For example, release dates have been slipping all over for this game. Normally, people wouldn't say much. Happens all the time. No, we go right to him and blast the shit out of him. I'm guilty of it. The date kept slipping more and more. Since he put himself out there, I'm putting my target on him. It's his game, it's his fault. You said it would be this, it's not. So, what else will you say that's bullshit? They had to delay again for some issues a website found. Guess what? That's on him too. I'm not going to pat him on the back. The bugs he describes should have been found long before this. It goes on and on.

Then, when it's time to pony up the dough for the game. People will think twice. Not only will they be questionable about the game itself, they may not decide to buy the game simply because they don't like HIM. That is a problem.

I'll summarize with this. When TWO huge big budget games such as God of War and God of War 2 have had less drama in the industry than a little $10 game, something is wrong.
 
nerbo said:
That's cool, but he's still just another human being and when it comes right down to it, Jaffe receives the same treatment here that any other GAF poster would receive. What's unfair in that?

This is a fun gaming forum and all, but it isn't and never has been 'professional' by any means. I don't know what you expect.

Jaffe doesn't recieve the same treatment. Hell, he is treated worse than Dyack. Look up his post, the source of all of this. It's in the "Playstation store for 5/3" thread.

Read it?

Ok. What does he say there that makes him deserve any flack?
 
nerbo said:
The more the gaming industry has to worry and police it's own image, the more it will become like Hollywood. That's not a good thing.

If the gaming industry is reduced to worrying about damage control at every turn, it will never earn any respect. As with any medium, freedom of expression should be paramount, regardless of how crude it may be. How can one recognize game development as an art form and worry about it's image being acceptable? The idea has always been to push the boundaries further. The moment we do otherwise is the moment it starts to crash.

Movies had to fight for almost 50 years to be respected. We are not done yet with videogames. Anything to accelerate the process. Those stupid non-news surely aren't helping anything.
But about Joy.stick, i thought they were also the guys from the mag of the same name. If they are only knowned or respected as a blog only, i don't see it as really harmfull to anything. Wired reporting this all is useless though and only put blogs and forum on a level they shouldn't reach imo.
 
Madman said:
Jaffe doesn't recieve the same treatment. Hell, he is treated worse than Dyack. Look up his post, the source of all of this. It's in the "Playstation store for 5/3" thread.

Read it?

Ok. What does he say there that makes him deserve any flack?

I see just as many here going to bat for him as there are ragging on him around here. People are taking it far too seriously.
 
Ranger X said:
Movies had to fight for almost 50 years to be respected. We are not done yet with videogames. Anything to accelerate the process. Those stupid non-news surely aren't helping anything.
But about Joy.stick, i thought they were also the guys from the mag of the same name. If they are only knowned or respected as a blog only, i don't see it as really harmfull to anything. Wired reporting this all is useless though and only put blogs and forum on a level they shouldn't reach imo.

Joy.stiq is not related to the mag, it's an offshoot blog by the company that runs the Engadget blog.

I'd argue that the movie industry is losing respect at this point, if anything. People are sick of the MPAA's antics, a flawed and biased ratings system, greedy studios with over-reaching anti-piracy measures that don't work and make criminals out of innocents. Modeling the gaming industry's battles after the movie industries is just asking for hurt and eventual implosion

Sure, movies had to fight, but they also fought during far less open times than we live in now to release some of the pictures they did. The gaming industry has it easy by comparison. Now is not the time to pull in the reigns, it is the time to say screw that, we are going to make the games we want to make, however we want to make them, because it's our damned right to do so. Same applies to who and how we report on those games.
 
Madman said:
You are right. It would have been the same. Minus the whole insulting and character degrading part. They weren't trying to be philosophical. They were trying to be insulting.

Please, anyone trying to say that ******* (notice how I can't even say the name) was trying to be completely professional and phiosophical should really consider the source. They were trying to insult him. Not make some intelligent point with deep meaning.

It was an incredibly poor choice to lead off with the analogy, absolutely no context or anything. "Like a little girl blah blah...David Jaffe" in the very first sentence is pretty horrible writing and it should have been fixed up in editing. I'm not denying that this is a bad article or that the site in question is a horrible site who basically troll the entire internet to get hits. What I'm saying is that the article, while poorly written, was not created with the intent to directly insult David Jaffe.

The little girl thing is a metaphor. This means it does not need to have any relation to the real world beyond the analogy it describes. The analogy in this case being that Jaffe loves CAC so much that he doesn't want to let go of it.

If they'd wanted to insult him they'd have just come out and said "Whiny little baby girl David Jaffe realised his crappy game wasn't good enough for release so he had to go back and try and make it marginally less crappy at the last minute. Also he is a little girl and you should all point and laugh at him".

I like the way Jaffe rolls. I like the fact that he swears as much as I do and that he doesn't bother with PR speak. It makes me feel like he understands where I'm coming from when I play his games. This latest case either smacks of a guy who is desperately insecure and immature or a guy who has deliberately established a persona as a way to garner publicity for his games. If it's the former then the guy needs to grow up and deal with his issues, because there are many things in the world more important than what some useless blog may or may not have indirectly implied about your masculinity.

If you were out with a group of friends and an outsider came up and started chatting and then jokingly mentioned that one of your friends had girly looking hair, and then that friend proceeded to go totally apeshit at the guy and start frothing at him, you'd probably be pretty freaked out. I'd like to think that most of us would just laugh the comment off or think up a witty comeback. Why is Jaffe getting applauded for the internet version of the violent lunatic here?
 
nerbo said:
I see just as many here going to bat for him as there are ragging on him around here. People are taking it far too seriously.
You never answered my question. What did he say that made him deserve flack? I'm just trying to understand what warrented all the insulting.
 
Kintaro said:
I'll summarize with this. When TWO huge big budget games such as God of War and God of War 2 have had less drama in the industry than a little $10 game, something is wrong.
Absolutely agree. This is the heart of it which I also pointed out earlier but everyone seems to be ignoring it.
 
Madman said:
You never answered my question. What did he say that made him deserve flack?

Hehe, I never said he did deserve flack. I simply pointed out that he's getting similar treatment to the majority of forum members. It's pretty routine for GAF to flip out on someone far beyond what is appropriate.
 
bananabread said:
It was an incredibly poor choice to lead off with the analogy, absolutely no context or anything. "Like a little girl blah blah...David Jaffe" in the very first sentence is pretty horrible writing and it should have been fixed up in editing. I'm not denying that this is a bad article or that the site in question is a horrible site who basically troll the entire internet to get hits. What I'm saying is that the article, while poorly written, was not created with the intent to directly insult David Jaffe.

The little girl thing is a metaphor. This means it does not need to have any relation to the real world beyond the analogy it describes. The analogy in this case being that Jaffe loves CAC so much that he doesn't want to let go of it.

If they'd wanted to insult him they'd have just come out and said "Whiny little baby girl David Jaffe realised his crappy game wasn't good enough for release so he had to go back and try and make it marginally less crappy at the last minute. Also he is a little girl and you should all point and laugh at him".

I like the way Jaffe rolls. I like the fact that he swears as much as I do and that he doesn't bother with PR speak. It makes me feel like he understands where I'm coming from when I play his games. This latest case either smacks of a guy who is desperately insecure and immature or a guy who has deliberately established a persona as a way to garner publicity for his games. If it's the former then the guy needs to grow up and deal with his issues, because there are many things in the world more important than what some useless blog may or may not have indirectly implied about your masculinity.

If you were out with a group of friends and an outsider came up and started chatting and then jokingly mentioned that one of your friends had girly looking hair, and then that friend proceeded to go totally apeshit at the guy and start frothing at him, you'd probably be pretty freaked out. I'd like to think that most of us would just laugh the comment off or think up a witty comeback. Why is Jaffe getting applauded for the internet version of the violent lunatic here?

Man, you are trying really ****ing hard but it just isn't working.

If your group of friends scenario took place I wouldn't expect "frothing", as none of my friends do that, but the response David Jaffe gave would definitely be acceptable and expected.

You're over-exaggerating his response, and downplaying *******'s insult. It's obvious and strange.
 
Ranger X said:
I agree but i am of this point of view that we need to make an extra effort for videogames to at least reach the status of respect music and movies have. Videogames are having a greater image problem than those 2 other medias and this industry is young. Drama for fun about movies and music isn't as damageable as drama for fun about videogames in the mean that it keep our image problems in good shape...

I don't see why people lately have been making this push to get respect for the videogames industry. I mean we should get rid of a bad image, created by sensationalist media outlets, but that's about it. What's in it for us? Seems to me the more notoriety the industry has gotten the worse the drama and all the shit that goes with it that we don't want. I think the craziest part about this is that if you ask a casual gamer if they even know who Jaffe is they'll probably say no. Casual gamers, not even normal people don't really know about this drama that explodes across blogs and forums. What's the big deal?
 
Everyone in here are like maggots, maggots that eat and eat and eat until they get big. Yea, big nasty maggots. Figure out what I'm really saying.

You need to eat to live and grow ^^. Grow into healthy beings.
 
Ploid 3.0 said:
Everyone in here are like maggots, maggots that eat and eat and eat until they get big. Yea, big nasty maggots. Figure out what I'm really saying.

You need to eat to live and grow ^^. Grow into healthy beings.

J0ystiq Metaphorology Approved!
 
Kintaro said:
I'll summarize with this. When TWO huge big budget games such as God of War and God of War 2 have had less drama in the industry than a little $10 game, something is wrong.
Might just give a $10 shot in the arm, don't you think? No, I'm not saying this is all intentional, but don't you think this publicity will garner some attention for a game?

Same could be said for that website in particular. *puts on tinfoil hat*
 
I think Jaffe would get a lot more cred if he just started going up to people and punching them in the face. Then *no one* would compare him to a little girl.
 
bananabread said:
It was an incredibly poor choice to lead off with the analogy, absolutely no context or anything. "Like a little girl blah blah...David Jaffe" in the very first sentence is pretty horrible writing and it should have been fixed up in editing. I'm not denying that this is a bad article or that the site in question is a horrible site who basically troll the entire internet to get hits. What I'm saying is that the article, while poorly written, was not created with the intent to directly insult David Jaffe.

The little girl thing is a metaphor. This means it does not need to have any relation to the real world beyond the analogy it describes. The analogy in this case being that Jaffe loves CAC so much that he doesn't want to let go of it.

If they'd wanted to insult him they'd have just come out and said "Whiny little baby girl David Jaffe realised his crappy game wasn't good enough for release so he had to go back and try and make it marginally less crappy at the last minute. Also he is a little girl and you should all point and laugh at him".

I like the way Jaffe rolls. I like the fact that he swears as much as I do and that he doesn't bother with PR speak. It makes me feel like he understands where I'm coming from when I play his games. This latest case either smacks of a guy who is desperately insecure and immature or a guy who has deliberately established a persona as a way to garner publicity for his games. If it's the former then the guy needs to grow up and deal with his issues, because there are many things in the world more important than what some useless blog may or may not have indirectly implied about your masculinity.

If you were out with a group of friends and an outsider came up and started chatting and then jokingly mentioned that one of your friends had girly looking hair, and then that friend proceeded to go totally apeshit at the guy and start frothing at him, you'd probably be pretty freaked out. I'd like to think that most of us would just laugh the comment off or think up a witty comeback. Why is Jaffe getting applauded for the internet version of the violent lunatic here?

Do you really think that ******* was trying to not be insulting? They said Jaffe was a little girl and that his game was garage bin material. Sure, it can be spun to say that it was purely metaphorical and in no way they were trying to draw similarities or analogies between anything, but that's nothing but pure spin on the situation.

I'll just say I wouldn't laugh it off if someone called me a little girl. To me, that would be calling me a bitch and I would respond accordingly.
 
thanks said:
What's in it for us?

What?
The more your medium is respected, the greater your liberty of expression. This means publisher would take more risk and gaming would probably be better.
Videogames could also become a real "2 crowds" industry like movies and music.
Commercial shitty hollywood stuff one side, daring and more artistic game the other side.
 
Top Bottom