How is asking a legit question hating? You seem hellbent on taking up for a game you have no stock in.You seem second only to iambladers for shitting on this game. You seem to hate it so much, yet you're always in the threads. Very strange.
That's a 60 fps gif. Y u do dis?
Edit: Am I crazy? It looks 60 to me when he makes the aiming adjustment between the two cars.
I'm entitled to my right to dislike the game, as for me being iambladers, you must be lost or something and its really rich coming from you. If you don't like my observation on the laptop, put me on your ignore list and move on with your life.You seem second only to iambladers for shitting on this game. You seem to hate it so much, yet you're always in the threads. Very strange.
I saw several copies being sold yesterday. I live in the same town as the guy who made ​​the video of the PS3 version. No PS4 version, though.
I guess you missed his previous posts.How is asking a legit question hating? You seem hellbent on taking up for a game you have no stock in.
The one where I said a picture looks embarrassing because it was? It's now a crime to call things as it is or call out ubisoft on their bs? Is it a crime to be disappointed by a game with wasted potential? Please, move along, backroom moderating is against the tos.I guess you missed his previous posts.
Why does the explosion look like baby powder?
This is hilarious, perfectly showcases the kind of criticism this game gets.wth, that laptop is ridiculously big?
PS4 direct feed screenshots
http://www.dualshockers.com/2014/05...enshots-show-that-it-looks-nothing-like-gta5/
Notable lol
wth, that laptop is ridiculously big?
PS4 direct feed screenshots
http://www.dualshockers.com/2014/05...enshots-show-that-it-looks-nothing-like-gta5/
Notable lol
Is the PS4 lacking DOF and Bokeh?
The reason this game gets so much criticism is because of e3 2012. No one can deny that the game has gotten significantly worse with each showing. What I don't understand is how your game can end up looking worse with an increased dev time. It's truly outstanding.This is hilarious, perfectly showcases the kind of criticism this game gets.
too bad the day time lighting is shit
So this game is really last-gen at daytime and next-gen at night.
The difference between night and say is ... errm ... night and day.
Lack of AF in the supposed X1 footage is a real bummer.
Seeing these daytime shots Ubisoft should have really made this a night only game. How the difference is so huge is staggering.
I think GTA has a better lighting engine.
I think it's as simple as Ubi's artists not being as good as Rockstar's in this case because GTAV has great looking sunlight and looks more pleasing in clear day conditions than W_D.
LOL at the female on the right.
Literally 10fts, and it looks like a doll. Even GTA has better draw distance than that =(.
And the car on the left...yeah...next gen is here.
Yo that screenshot is ass, are there more?
Low resolution + lack of AA = bad graphics
but I just wanted to point out that the daytime footage looking meh is certainly not because it's supposed to be bland..
Ubisoft did deserve most of the shit they got, GAF hyperbole or not. Basically their out of touch approach all but confirmed a downgrade. The game's (very) far from ugly but they know and we know - it ain't quite what we saw a couple years back, and they got caught in that lie but never fessed up.
The reason this game gets so much criticism is because of e3 2012. No one can deny that the game has gotten significantly worse with each showing. What I don't understand is how your game can end up looking worse with an increased dev time. It's truly outstanding.
That is fine but one could argue that infamous has come close to matching that benchmark. What is concerning though is that they showed this game at sony's conference at e3 2013 running on "ps4" and that footage ran at a higher resolution than today's game and it looked significantly better as well.In 2012 that took a shot at what they expected next gen consoles to be capable of. It appears that the consoles have fallen below that expectation.
gawd ubi. come on man. this is ridiculous. why would you take that out the game. what purpose?
are you fcking kidd...
i mean come on man. jesus christ.
The reason this game gets so much criticism is because of e3 2012. No one can deny that the game has gotten significantly worse with each showing. What I don't understand is how your game can end up looking worse with an increased dev time. It's truly outstanding.
That is fine but one could argue that infamous has come close to matching that benchmark. What is concerning though is that they showed this game at sony's conference at e3 2013 running on "ps4" and that footage ran at a higher resolution than today's game and it looked significantly better as well.
PS4 direct feed screenshots
http://www.dualshockers.com/2014/05...enshots-show-that-it-looks-nothing-like-gta5/
Notable lol
They appear to be using a temporal AA (like Infamous SS/Crysis 2) as evidenced by the ghosting on the white SUV here:
hhahaha i love it. i luv it.
can't say i didn't warn you ppl!
footage of daytime from summer 2013 before being removed.
look at this
does it suprise u?
does that fucking surprise you?
doesn't surprise me one bit.
i mean...look at it!!!
http://a.pomf.se/ocsvir.webm
gawd ubi. come on man. this is ridiculous. why would you take that out the game. what purpose?
are you fcking kidd...
i mean come on man. jesus christ.
I am so close to hit the eject button on this game, just waiting for official reviews to decide if I should keep or cancel my pre orderThose new shots look bad
because the review thread will be gloriousWhy is he still not banned ?
No, it's when you say things like this:The one where I said a picture looks embarrassing because it was? It's now a crime to call things as it is or call out ubisoft on their bs? Is it a crime to be disappointed by a game with wasted potential? Please, move along, backroom moderating is against the tos.
Given ubisoft history, the focus should be on the incompetence of the developers and not on a perceived deficiency in the consoles.
Honestly, it's truly embarrassing for ubisoft. Morin and crew should be ashamed.
I am surprised at the level of incompetence displayed by ubisoft.
why should he be?Why is he still not banned ?
Maybe for the entertainment he provides.Why is he still not banned ?
No AF here either....or very low. maybe 2 x. looks poor
why should he be?
PS4 direct feed screenshots
http://www.dualshockers.com/2014/05...enshots-show-that-it-looks-nothing-like-gta5/
Notable lol
Is this what video games will look like until next gen starts in 2022?
I like you, everyone thinks that we should like all games in here but everyone has an opinion. I don't like this game either and if I want to say something bad about it then I will. Ubisoft fucked up on this one to be honest; I just want to see what that pc version looks like because I won't pick this up on my consoles.I'm entitled to my right to dislike the game, as for me being iambladers, you must be lost or something and its really rich coming from you. If you don't like my observation on the laptop, put me on your ignore list and move on with your life.
Is this what video games will look like until next gen starts in 2022?
Because I was lying right? Right? It's not embarrassing to release something that looks worse than when you revealed 2 years ago? I named dropped because of the interviews I read and talk about cherry picking posts. Try and read the whole thread next time. If you don't like my posts, move on with your life by putting me on your ignore list which is what I'm about to do to you. Your backroom moderating is starting to piss me off and you need to get out of my face. Btw, keep your sense of morality to yourself, it's as useful to me as filthy rags.No, it's when you say things like this:
There's just absolutely no need for these kind of comments.