• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Waypoint: Inside the Sexual Misconduct Allegations Rocking NeoGAF's Last 48 Hours

Sygma

Member
i mean everyone is understanding that evilore is a low life piece of shit who just wont take any responsability because "its flying way above him" , right ? pedophile mod, and going for women twice when smashed should ring at least a bell
 

itxaka

Defeatist
Not only did she "forgive" him, but then aired their dirty laundry under an explosively popular hashtag and then say "I didn't mean for it to blow up" ok.

Privately shared. Somebody else screen capped and shared it publicly. She took it down as she didnt want it to blow up. Context, as you said.
 

pastrami

Member
Ha, I'm the biased one here? It's called context. You the one with tunnel vision that can't look past a single event and draw a conclusion based on the facts presented. Just cold stop right at the shower incident.

Yeah. The context is that she decided to give him a second chance, eventually did have sex with him, and posted the allegations privately as a real example of sexual harassment she has faced.

But all you can see is she had sex with him (which ultimately has nothing to do with the sexual harassment) and then exposed him.

Who is the one with tunnel vision here?
 

Royce McCutcheon

Junior Member
Privately shared. Somebody else screen capped and shared it publicly. She took it down as she didnt want it to blow up. Context, as you said.

Lol, ok. We gonna forget she said "google evil lore" am I being pranked. She says a high profile GAF member and doesn't expect it to blow up?
 

Pixieking

Banned
Lol, ok. We gonna forget she said "google evil lore" am I being pranked. She says a high profile GAF member and doesn't expect it to blow up?

Man, you must think GAF is huuuuuuuuuuuuuge if you think this.

Christ, my wife wouldn't know what GAF was, and I rant at her about lots of gaming stuff.
 

nicoga3000

Saint Nic
Just gonna chime in and say she knew what she was doing. I'm not defending the situation on either side...

But she shared something on Facebook. "Privately". Which means NOTHING on the internet.
 

Royce McCutcheon

Junior Member
Do you understand she was saying that to people she thought she could trust, not to a journalist she was hoping was going to write a story?

Man, you must think GAF is huuuuuuuuuuuuuge if you think this.

Christ, my wife wouldn't know what GAF was, and I rant at her about lots of gaming stuff.

She was talking to her friends and if someone hadn't capped and spread it around this wouldn't have blown up.

Do you understand she was saying that to people she thought she could trust, not to a journalist she was hoping was going to write a story?

Man, you must think GAF is huuuuuuuuuuuuuge if you think this.

Christ, my wife wouldn't know what GAF was, and I rant at her about lots of gaming stuff.

Your wife doesn't know GAF, but this woman did, and apparently so did her friends, friends she knew were connected to gaf. Was this girl inept? A private Facebook post is an oxymoron. A private Facebook message to friends is still seen by hundreds of "friends" she has.
 

Vagabundo

Member
Your wife doesn't know GAF, but this woman did, and apparently so did her friends, friends she knew were connected to gaf. Was this girl inept? A private Facebook post is an oxymoron. A private Facebook message to friends is still seen by hundreds of "friends" she has.

Yes -let's say - she was inept. So what?
 

Pixieking

Banned
Your wife doesn't know GAF, but this woman did, and apparently so did her friends, friends she knew were connected to gaf. Was this girl inept? A private Facebook post is an oxymoron. A private Facebook message to friends is still seen by hundreds of "friends" she has.

Again, your bias is showing.

It depends upon her custom friends settings. And, even if every one of her friends saw it, you're advocating a woman be silent about her experiences. You get how that looks, right?
 
Your wife doesn't know GAF, but this woman did, and apparently so did her friends, friends she knew were connected to gaf. Was this girl inept? A private Facebook post is an oxymoron. A private Facebook message to friends is still seen by hundreds of "friends" she has.

Maybe she was a bit naive about it. So what though? Doesn't mean it was deliberate. Lots of people are careless when it comes to sharing on the internet.
 

HariKari

Member
Your wife doesn't know GAF, but this woman did, and apparently so did her friends, friends she knew were connected to gaf. Was this girl inept? A private Facebook post is an oxymoron. A private Facebook message to friends is still seen by hundreds of "friends" she has.

People make innocent 'mistakes' all the time, especially when talking to friends about something they want to vent about. That doesn't mean they should be haunted by it and their name plastered all over the internet. If this person wasn't willing to be named at any point, someone seriously wronged her by getting the name out there.

Jeff Gerstmann alluded to this news traveling in some 'gross' places on the internet (on the podcast) before it broke here. Does anyone know what that is about?
 
People make innocent 'mistakes' all the time, especially when talking to friends about something they want to vent about. That doesn't mean they should be haunted by it and their name plastered all over the internet. If this person wasn't willing to be named at any point, someone seriously wronged her by getting the name out there.

Jeff Gerstmann alluded to this news traveling in some 'gross' places on the internet (on the podcast) before it broke here. Does anyone know what that is about?

Was it not floating about in Voat and a couple of similar places? I think it made its way there first, then quickly to GAF and then the pre-collapse wave of deletions and topic locks started as the screencaps were spread here.
 

Neece

Member
Just a reminder that at least one of the women Harvey Weinstein harassed later had consensual sex with him, and several of the women remained friends, or at least friendly with him even after their harassment. There are some extraneous circumstances for that particular situation (careers and politics), but the point is it's not odd behavior for a victim of harassment or sexual misconduct to forgive and try to make the best of a fucked up situation.

Might be hard for some here to fathom, but holding grudges against people you like doesn't feel good, nor does explaining to your inner circle why you and so and so aren't friends anymore, especially if you know talking about the situation will net "well why were you drinking with him?" comments or gossip behind your back about you cheating, lying, being a whore, etc.

It's a lot of embarrassment, guilt, frustration, and regret, and sometimes it feels more empowering to let it go and continue being friends with the person you have grown close to instead of blowing it all up over something you can interpret as just a one-off mistake. And even hooking up with that person later on can feel like a step in regaining agency and control over what happened between you.

Shit can be and is often complicated and messy.
 
Privately shared. Somebody else screen capped and shared it publicly. She took it down as she didnt want it to blow up. Context, as you said.
Posting anything on Facebook is not private. Even if your account is private, any one of your friends can see it. Therefore, it's *not* private.
 

Llyranor

Member
That girl must be really proud of herself, that she destroyed this community and probably his life.
And what if it actually happened exactly how it was described (we'll never know)? How do you prove such a thing? And if there's no irrefutable proof, she should just have shut up? Do you say this to all alleged victims of sexual harassment?
 
Which is exactly what can happen .. and people should really give it more thought. You have a girlfriend or boyfriend .. you go out with Someone.. “ let’s get drunk”. Let’s go to a hotel room alone.. what can possibly go wrong .. wtf. People never learn.

Yeah agree. I personally wouldn't go out and get smashed to the point of vomiting then go back to the hotel of a friend of the opposite sex if I had a partner. I would find it weird and my partner would find it weird.

What's happening is a large proportion of these 'outraged' members have an axe to grind with EvilLore/NeoGaf that has been harboured for a long time most likely, stemming from such trivial things as console wars, former bans, political agendas etc.
 

Pixieking

Banned
I just realised... This is just "women don't belong in videogames" redux. After all, if she hadn't posted her experiences, GAF would be fine. So it's all her fault that GAF is screwed (and not at all EL's fault for handling it badly).

Yeah agree. I personally wouldn't go out and get smashed to the point of vomiting then go back to the hotel of a friend of the opposite sex if I had a partner. I would find it weird and my partner would find it weird.

I've done this, whilst engaged. Not getting drunk to the point of vomting, but everything else. Because, y'know, platonic friends with a member of the opposite sex without weirdness happening can actually happen.

And, yes, my fiance knew.
 

Royce McCutcheon

Junior Member
Is this going to be the new norm in here? Sad if true.

There are more doom and gloom people quoting this than what's being said. Isolate a quote and run with it seems to be the running theme in this topic.

I just realised... This is just "women don't belong in videogames" redux. After all, if she hadn't posted her experiences, GAF would be fine. So it's all her fault that GAF is screwed (and not at all EL's fault for handling it badly).

Of course it's lores fault, he pressed the button.
 

HariKari

Member
Shit can and is often complicated and messy.

The two continued to hang out, according to Leupp, because she attributed the incident to him "being drunk that one night." They talked about how what happened was "not okay," and he seemed receptive to the feedback.

"I had no reason not to trust him still," she said. "It was a creepy thing, but I tend to give people second chances. He had already invited me to go to E3."

Sounds like someone making a fully conscious decision, at least to me. Do you disagree?

Posting anything on Facebook is not private. Even if your account is private, any one of your friends can see it. Therefore, it's *not* private.

Most people do not stop and think about having something associated with them indefinitely on the internet when they post things among friends.
 

sonto340

Member
Yeah agree. I personally wouldn't go out and get smashed to the point of vomiting then go back to the hotel of a friend of the opposite sex if I had a partner. I would find it weird and my partner would find it weird.

What's happening is a large proportion of these 'outraged' members have an axe to grind with EvilLore/NeoGaf that has been harboured for a long time most likely, stemming from such trivial things as console wars, former bans, political agendas etc.
Sounds like you have a shitty partner and/or trust issues.
I have friends who are females that I get wasted with and crash at their place plenty of times. Same with her and make friends.
You’re busted in the head if you think the only thing stopping people from cheating on their significant other is them not being there.
 

Vitor711

Member
Everything about the Waypoint Article and Podcast episode makes me feel like I can't be a part of this community anymore unless Evillore divests his interests in GAF.

What's worse is that I'm seeing the 'new' community, the people choosing to stay behind be the awful GAF stereotypes that I always believed to be untrue.

There's a lot of good people in this thread but the fact that we're having to argue core concepts of assault and the practical realities of the situation is frankly sickening.

Peace out GAF, it was a wonderful decade with you while it lasted.
 

J-Rod

Member
I just want to point out that lore has done a lot of other crummy things on top of what has already come to light.

There was once a thread asking if traveling to instanbul is safe. The user crankyjay innocently pointed out to be careful of the bar scam because evilore once was a victim of it himself. Lore chimes in and tells him not to spread lies about his life. When cranky posted proof that he wasn’t lying, lore nuked the posts, the thread, and cranky’s account.

Proof:

n7RXOf8.png

The reason lore lied is because “his girl” whom he so affectionally described but “wouldn’t call” and the friend that was with him were unbeknownst to him obviously in on it. If you want a story where the woman got the best of lore instead of the other way around, then read that eurotrip tale in the screenshot straight from the horses mouth.

Just know lore doesn’t give a single shit about you, may call you a liar, and axe you for no good reason at all just to cover up his own lies and embarrassment.
 

Kurdel

Banned
What's worse is that I'm seeing the 'new' community, the people choosing to stay behind be the awful GAF stereotypes that I always believed to be untrue.

There's a lot of good people in this thread but the fact that we're having to argue core concepts of assault and the practical realities of the situation is frankly sickening. .

Yeah, this bums me out so much.
 

HariKari

Member
Who said anything about her not making a conscious decision?

Your post implies that she was pressured, embarrassed, frustrated, and/or guilted into having a physical relationship with him after the fact. That the decision wasn't fully hers, essentially. I'm simply asking if that's what you personally believe to be case.
 

Llyranor

Member
I just want to point out that lore has done a lot of other crummy things on top of what has already come to light.

There was once a thread asking if traveling to instanbul is safe. The user crankyjay innocently pointed out to be careful of the bar scam because evilore once was a victim of it himself. Lore chimes in and tells him not to spread lies about his life. When cranky posted proof that he wasn’t lying, lore nuked the posts, the thread, and cranky’s account.

Proof:



The reason lore lied is because “his girl” whom he so affectionally described but “wouldn’t call” and the friend that was with him were unbeknownst to him obviously in on it. If you want a story where the woman got the best of lore instead of the other way around, then read that eurotrip tale in the screenshot straight from the horses mouth.

Just know lore doesn’t give a single shit about you, may call you a liar, and axe you for no good reason at all just to cover up his own lies and embarrassment.
Trying to view that pic on mobile, and it seems like a really low quality image where I can't even read anything when trying to zoom in. Do you have a better link?
 

Neece

Member
Everything about the Waypoint Article and Podcast episode makes me feel like I can't be a part of this community anymore unless Evillore divests his interests in GAF.

What's worse is that I'm seeing the 'new' community, the people choosing to stay behind be the awful GAF stereotypes that I always believed to be untrue.

There's a lot of good people in this thread but the fact that we're having to argue core concepts of assault and the practical realities of the situation is frankly sickening.

Peace out GAF, it was a wonderful decade with you while it lasted.

Yeah it's pretty sad. My posts are all but academic at this point. Mentally I've checked out reading this new community of viewpoints.
 

Neece

Member
Your post implies that she was pressured, embarrassed, frustrated, and/or guilted into having a physical relationship with him after the fact. That the decision wasn't fully hers, essentially. I'm simply asking if that's what you personally believe to be case.

I think your comprehension of my post is a little off.
 

HariKari

Member
I think your comprehension of my post is a little off.

You posted a thoughtful warning about the consequences of sexual misconduct and how it has an effect on people in a thread about a specific occurrence of it. I'm not crazy for assuming you are referring to the incident under discussion in the thread. This misunderstanding - if it is one - doesn't preclude you from answering a direct question. I am not shooting for a 'gotcha' moment or trying to deconstruct what you said as it was completely on point. I am simply asking if you believe it applies in this case.
 

ElfArmy177

Member
Neogaf after #neogate.
Enjoy the new community folks.

Oh please, she had sex with him afterwards, dude can't be that horrible if she was so upset she decides to have sex anyways. People do dumb shit, including evilore. What he did was absolutely stupid and creepy but from what I've read he apologized and left her alone. He didn't rape her or hold her against her will. Its dumb, he messed up (big time).

Let's be honest here though.. alot of this is just mob mentality... This guy didn't do anything to any of you and you're all acting like he killed your dog.

If she thought he should burn for what he did... She wouldn't have fucked him at another date.. I dunno if you understand how humans usually work, but if you can forgive someone to the point of being emotionally and physically intimate soon after... Maybe it's blown out of proportion

Then again.. I'm a nurse who worked with people who have actually been raped, hell my own wife was raped and even she thinks this is a bunch of Bullock's when I told her. (I'm not saying it's ok to be creepy or sexually harass/assault women or men by any means, I'm only saying this sounds more like a stupid mistake than a real calculated sexual predator)

This doesn't excuse evilore as I said what he did was still creepy as hell. And I'm sure she felt terrified she COULD become a rape victim... Which simply making someone feel this way is horrible in itself. Again though... She had sex with this horrible sexual predator afterwards... (I can't forgive the revenge porn though since I've been a threatened vitim of that by an ex wife). I guess I'm the type of hopes there is good in everyone and hopefully he learned his lesson.
 

Metroxed

Member
There's something I don't get. According the article, they had already settled the issue and moved on (to the point of staying amicable and even having consensual sex at some later point). I imagine she may have feel inspired by the #MeToo campaign and wanted to share her story. That's fair. But why incriminate him directly ("google evil lore") if they had already settled everything up privately. She could have just talked about it without mentioning names, unless she does indeed have some hidden motives.
 

rudger

Member
There's something I don't get. According the article, they had already settled the issue and moved on (to the point of staying amicable and even having consensual sex at some later point). I imagine she may have feel inspired by the #MeToo campaign and wanted to share her story. That's fair. But why incriminate him directly ("google evil lore") if they had already settled everything up privately. She could have just talked about it without mentioning names, unless she does indeed have some hidden motives.

She explains that his actions later put his actions in the past in a new light. She re-evaluated the situation and expressed it as part of the MeToo campaign.
 
Top Bottom