Kafel said:
Insertia said:I personally don't care about the future down loadable content. Something tells me they don't know or won't care either.
Dever said:But seriously, why do they have to counteract it? They can't make the Ps3 version a more appealing version anymore, it's impossible. It's a blow for sure, but Sony can't really do anything about it. Should we make a thread about how MS is going to counteract MGS4? Or how Sony and MS are going to counteract Smash Bros and Wii Fit? Consoles have stuff that's exclusive to them, and no one can do anything about it(Except make a thread on GAF).
Dever said:Hey I know, maybe they should make Rockstar develop a new exclusive franchise for the Ps3 or something. I know it's unlikely bu... Oh wait a minute.
But seriously, why do they have to counteract it? They can't make the Ps3 version a more appealing version anymore, it's impossible. It's a blow for sure, but Sony can't really do anything about it. Should we make a thread about how MS is going to counteract MGS4? Or how Sony and MS are going to counteract Smash Bros and Wii Fit? Consoles have stuff that's exclusive to them, and no one can do anything about it(Except make a thread on GAF).
Dever said:Hey I know, maybe they should make Rockstar develop a new exclusive franchise for the Ps3 or something. I know it's unlikely bu... Oh wait a minute.
But seriously, why do they have to counteract it? They can't make the Ps3 version a more appealing version anymore, it's impossible. It's a blow for sure, but Sony can't really do anything about it. Should we make a thread about how MS is going to counteract MGS4? Or how Sony and MS are going to counteract Smash Bros and Wii Fit? Consoles have stuff that's exclusive to them, and no one can do anything about it(Except make a thread on GAF).
VonGak! said:^head implodes from logic overload*
Isn't logic a bannable offence on Gaf?
BenjaminBirdie said:I think the only thing worse than illogical posting are posts pretending the very fabric of logic is some kind of relic from an Alan Quatermain novel.
And I'm a guy who thinks hyperbole is the best thing ever in anything ever.
sprocket said:Wasn't there talk of ps3 getting its own exclusive content at one time? Some insider info or something?
So what if that happens?
sprocket said:Wasn't there talk of ps3 getting its own exclusive content at one time? Some insider info or something?
So what if that happens?
k79 said:I don't understand all the hype for the GTA4 DLC.Are people actually excited for this? :/
VonGak! said:Nah it's just you who can't handle logic, probably because it doesn't go well with your wet dream scenario. ^.^
greendublin said:For true. Nobody outside of GAF knows or cares about downloadable content for GTA... at this point. If MS sells the DLC hard in advertising as a 'sequel' of sorts, that could draw in some eyes.
Dunlop said:http://www.xbox.com/en-US/games/g/grandtheftautoiv/sweepstakes/default.htm
It begins on MS's side.
Not available in Quebec...bastards
You attacked me for supporting a post based on logic ^.^ Do not do this again.BenjaminBirdie said:...what?
ding ding. we have a winnerDunlop said:It's really going to come down to who will buy a console just for GTA IV? Those will choose to buy the 360. For anyone else the PS3 version will be "good enough" and it will come down to the functions/game Library/price
tanod said:First of all, it's not like this content is going to be free and when we know what is actually in the DLC, whatever you think it should cost, it will be about $10 more than that.
People have to spend $350 to buy a 360 that can play the DLC, or alternatively $280 + $100 if they buy an arcade first.
Mainly: Free to play online.
shpankey said:ding ding. we have a winner
VonGak! said:You attacked me for supporting a post based on logic ^.^ Do not do this again.
This whole topic is just a cesspool for silly fanboy war like the previous "OMG how is PS3 going to survive when Halo 3 get released, it's all over I tell you".
Yes it hurts not having Halo and yes it hurts not having DLC content for GTA (which we do not even know the extend of), but they are not the ultimate weapons as some want them to be (HELLO) nor do these games/DLC suck as some tries to make it seem.
Now let's not have more these silly "how is console maker X going to counter MGS/FF/SMB/LBP/GT/" threads; Gaf is already attracting enough scum who'd rather wank to console brands than play and talk about games.
ManaByte said:What? You're just pulling something out of your ass to say that the GTA4 DLC will be $10 more than other DLC? Wat?
ManaByte said:What? You're just pulling something out of your ass to say that the GTA4 DLC will be $10 more than other DLC? Wat?
tanod said:No. I'm saying that generally all major DLC or downloadable games (not specific to any console or game) is always about $5-10 more expensive than you think they should be.
DLC always tends to be less appealing after the price is finally announced.
ManaByte said:Most DLC and XBLA games are only $5-$10. Wat?
tanod said:You missed an important adjective in my sentence: major
EDIT: What Cilonen said.
ManaByte said:Most DLC and XBLA games are only $5-$10. Wat?
ManaByte said:Find a $30 XBLA game or $30 DLC (expansions like Shattered Isles don't count) and then post. Thanks.
cilonen said:Hahaha. "Find anything apart from the most appropriate example to date". Shivering Isles is like the closest thing to the proposed GTAIV DLC to base any assumptions off on.
ManaByte said:I wasn't aware the GTA4 DLC was getting a retail release? Can you provide a link to that announcement? Shivering Isles was released both in retail and download and is more of digital distribution of a retail game than DLC.
And what if Rockstar doesn't even charge for the DLC? They've already made $50 million off it. What if MS uses that $50 million they paid Rockstar as a major marketing tool. Imagine the hype if in August everyone who has GTA4 on the 360 could download the next episode for FREE because Rockstar had already been paid for it.
DemDereNads said:Probably already been said but... include it on the original disk (thus, it won't be DLC) since they will not run into space restrictions.
tanod said:I'm pretty sure that 50 million was an advance on purchase royalties. Besides that point: thinking that it has a snowball's chance of being free is absurd.
squatingyeti said:Which part of exclusive content is hard to understand? Exclusive or content? I mean, it's gone beyond just saying the DLC is exclusive, they've both said the content is. You could just stop fighting it so much and either a) choose to buy it on 360 and get the DLC OR b) buy it on the PS3 and be perfectly happy with the tons of joy the regular game brings.
I guess when you don't understand the difference between price fixing and making a profit, this could be a hard concept to grasp.