TheRedSnifit
Member
Yeah, Sony totally 'expected' me to buy a Pro.
Well, if we're talking about the price of running PC games at their highest potential, it's only fair we look at the cost of doing the same for console games.
Yeah, Sony totally 'expected' me to buy a Pro.
A display cord and power cord?so many wires!!! i just want to start game and play
i watch caddicarus, and this was basically his reasoning for preferring consoles to PC for video games generally. i think its a p legit and respectable reason
That's a different expectation though. You don't have to run everything on ULTRA to get better graphics and frame rates than a console port. And i'm pretty sure the 970 still exceeds what the consoles can do today by a wide margin.A lot of people somehow do. Remember when the 970 launched and a lot of people built their first gaming PC or first gaming PC in years and they were 100% sure it will run everything at ULTRA for years?
This is one big setback for me when it comes to online shooters. I only use controllers. I just don't find mouse keyboard comfortable. If I try to play an online shooter on PC I'm fucked. It just isn't balanced. Now I don't consider that a particularly huge loss since I don't play many multiplayer shooters anyway, but the few I would like to play I pretty much cant. Hurts my excitement for COD WW2 a fair bit. Don't pay for PS Plus anymore either so that option is out the window too. Sucks.
Those who complain about how difficult PC gaming is simply cannot have used a modern PC with Steam.
I mean I don't know why you'd buy cod on pc for mp anyways. Activision killed the series on pc with their mishandling of it. People like to laugh about the mw2 boycott, but the series is basically dead these days on the platform because of the changes Activision made. Kind of sad because the CoD community used to be really big on pc but it is what it is.
It's pretty crazy Activision hasn't made a PC focused F2P Call of Duty that's run as a game as a service with free maps and weapons but weapon skin microtransactions.
I started pc gaming iun 2007, ggot a lot of frustration until irealized the importance of cpu, gpu, and compoennts. I learnt to search how to opitmize a game, how to edit files, how to run very very old games.
No I was just agreeing with the one problem PC gaming have, imo. The cost of getting the PC experience people use to sell PC gaming to you. Higher framerates, better graphics, etc. I went in with zero knowledge, no accessories since before, a blank slate, and I wanted a beast of a PC, and eventually had a 144hz triple screen setup and roughly $3000 less on the bank. :SWell, you get what you pay for. Better things cost more, that applies to everything. Is anyone expecting a good gaming PC that delivers a better gaming experience than a console to cost as much as a console?
1. Ignorance is not an insult. Relax.
2. The comparison to a console is irrelevant when discussing the level of difficulty required when using a PC
3. Tinkering is for the most part, optional. Reserved mostly for those who want to finetune performance. For those that cannot be bothered with that, go auto-detect or go console.
What I mean is people say "Oh. I have to google to fix that issue.", but whenever somethings free here (like AC3 in the Chinese store) googling how to do that doesnt seem to be a problem.
Τhe bolded is true for current consoles though, their CPU is much worse than what their GPU could deliver. And in this case you can't even do anything about it even if you are informed.PC gaming is and always has been a bitch.
For starters, the build you choose can be flawed out of the box and you will never know why.
"Oh that motherboard is known for having X issue"
"That graphics card doesn't get along too well with that CPU"
"You have created a bottleneck with those parts, this part is slower than that other one and you're not taking full advantage of it"
"The PSU you bought is insufficient, should have gone with a bigger one"
"That RAM is slow, this other brand with the very same specs is better quality, more expensive, faster RAM"
.
I'm not talking about using, the only way to avoid getting mugged off in PC gaming is to build it yourself.
Sit your average Joe down and start banging on about motherboards, socket types, thermal pastes, power requirements and then send them out into the wild to source the shit, then put it together... it's not in the same park as lifting a console out of a box and plugging it into the tv.
Of course if you want to build your own pc then you are looking at something much more technical than hooking a console to a tv. I don't think anyone would deny that. But I mean that's pretty much the equivelant of choosing hardmode to save a bit of money
When it comes to the topic of pc gaming being considered too technical, I feel like it's generally more about stuff like optimizing the settings for each game. Maybe installations. And of course the dreaded "ini" file, that I've seen a stupid amount of people use as an excuse for why pc gaming is supposedly too hard over the years.
Sit your average Joe down and start banging on about motherboards, socket types, thermal pastes, power requirements and then send them out into the wild to source the shit, then put it together... it's not in the same park as lifting a console out of a box and plugging it into the tv.
Because console warriors, brand loyalty, misinformation and uneducated people.
But it doesn't matter. A console game will run on a console no matter how inefficient it is. On a pc, those inefficiencies can be the difference between the game working properly or not.Τhe bolded is true for current consoles though, their CPU is much worse than what their GPU could deliver. And in this case you can't even do anything about it even if you are informed.
I only had headaches because of the cost but my - this is so worth it! - moment was Trackmania triple screen at 144fps. I had never seen anything move higher than 60fps ever in my life before. And to see it on a racing game. Holy crap it was so awesomeI went through alot of headaches with my build...
But when I saw GTA V running in 4K with Ultra textures and 50-ish FPS, it was all worth it...
But it doesn't matter. A console game will run on a console no matter how inefficient it is. On a pc, those inefficiencies can be the difference between the game working properly or not.
Now in 2017 I think that pc gaming is actually "easier" than console gaming in general. Both systems (pc and consoles) are having the same low amount of issues and crashes but if something goes wrong then there is a 0 chance to fix it on a console on your own.
This is also why it's really bugging me that 4K seems to be 60hz on PC for now. I don't want to go down to 60fps again!
Er, as I wrote?You wrote "That graphics card doesn't get along too well with that CPU". I guess i don't know what that means exactly... i never run into this problem. You can have a game that doesn't get along with certain CPUs or GPUs or drivers but not because of a "bad" combination. If the CPU and GPU fit in the slots of a motherboard then it's a good enough combination for things to work properly.
Also you wrote, "You have created a bottleneck with those parts, this part is slower than that other one and you're not taking full advantage of it". That doesn't make games not work properly either. It makes games run at slower frame rates than they could.
But the 780Ti is also considerably more powerful and was a lot more expensive than PS4. A PS4 equivalent hardware from that time which performed as well or better back then will most definitely have some issues tody, if not for architectural disadvantage then due to VRAM limitations...this was 3.5 years ago and we'll keep getting PS4 games for another 3 years or so. That's what I am trying to say because there are people here who have claimed that you could pretty much get a console equivalent or something slightly better around launch and be set for the entire generation when it's not really true.Still though, this is a PC vs Console issue. The 780ti is a 2013 card that was released alongside the PS4. Today it still has enough left over power to brute force through these un-optimized drivers in order to still have better results than a PS4. At least the base PS4.
What i'm trying to say is that you got your money's worth. You could have this card for 3+ years and it would still be better than a PS4, correct?
Many people seem to be overwhelmed by the huge varity of different pc components - which is understandable. But there is no need to built a pc on your own and you can always simply ask any friend or just buy a pre-build pc.Can you give an example because that doesn't make any sense to me.
Those are such nonissues it's ridiculous. Thermal paste? Seriously? It's preapplied on the cooler that comes with your CPU fan. If you buy a new cooler they give you a packet. What's so difficult?
Power requirements? Really? This isn't rocket science and you don't need super high wattage PSUs to power PCs. Socket types? C'mon. Do you own a socket set?
I mean, it's like saying people can't figure out a Microwave over because they have to be concerned about wattages.
Well I've never had an ini file issue the weirdest I ever came across was CoD 1 on windows 7, had to rename the executable to a different game name for that to run.
And lets face it, not a bit of money is it, sometimes it's shocking, wasn't there a fella on here a few weeks ago that spent 2 grand and it had a 1060 in it?
Τhe problem is really the VRAM i believe. 3 years ago, the equivalent of a PS4 was a PC based on a 750ti. Could this card perform as well as a PS4 today, in multiplatform games, if it had more VRAM to support the same textures? When i say "well" i mean 30fps/medium settings, 900-1080p.But the 780Ti is also considerably more powerful and was a lot more expensive than PS4. A PS4 equivalent hardware from that time which performed as well or better back then will most definitely have some issues tody, if not for architectural disadvantage then due to VRAM limitations...this was 3.5 years ago and we'll keep getting PS4 games for another 3 years or so. That's what I am trying to say because there are people here who have claimed that you could pretty much get a console equivalent or something slightly better around launch and be set for the entire generation when it's not really true.
Because they are scare of people switching from consoles to PC gaming and cause the decline of console gaming.