Is that card enough to max out watch dogs?770 2GB is gonna be fine. It's still an amazing card. Unless your going 4K you'll be splitting hairs with most of what's been released. Stop being so down.
Is that card enough to max out watch dogs?770 2GB is gonna be fine. It's still an amazing card. Unless your going 4K you'll be splitting hairs with most of what's been released. Stop being so down.
and I thought my 770 was good for another year. fuck this shit.
Is that card enough to max out watch dogs?
1080p.At what resolution?
muh optimizationwe are in the age where console optimization has overtaken PCs even with superior GPUs. a graphics card alone to get 4 VRAM is what 350ish+
At what resolution?
In case of Watch Dogs... No, not really. Ultra textures are kinda broken though as they mess up the streaming.
Oh my bad, I was looking at new ones. You're right.I dont think we are seeing the same prices.
I see 120 and 130 euros but thats for used ones.
In summer you could find one at 150 euros brand new because they were clearing old stocks after rebranding.
Search for R9 280 its the new name.
Also worth noting that I bought a r9 290 with 4gb of vram for 220 euros during sales.
Then again, not as expensive as you make it.
They're not and no one is saying they are, but high requires 3 gigs. That's an expensive card. And this is a cross-gen game that's releasing in the first year of next-gen. Think about it and what it means for 2015 and beyond.
1080p.
1080p?
After fixes of course, at launch is optimization in general was pretty crap and ultra textures would make even 4gb cards stutter.
Do you really want me to google that for you? Because the information is easily available.answer is yes.
we are in the age where console optimization has overtaken PCs even with superior GPUs. a graphics card alone to get 4 VRAM is what 350ish+
Well, I guess WB just saved me 60$. I can't even say how much I love when publishers doing such a nice thing. THANK YOU WB. THANK YOU SO MUCH!
Quick Google search tells me 2 gigs can only get high with fxaa.Do you really want me to google that for you? Because the information is easily available.answer is yes.
Thx, but nope, I have HD 6870 with 1 GB VRAM and I have no desire to play this game with low quality textures + it seems like this game is only about about killing orks for the most part and I have no interest in killing tons of orks in LOTR game over 30 hours, it;s just f*****g boring as hell.
P.S. PS4 is not an option for me cuz I won't buy this console till at least 2017-2018 for sure.
I hope this was a joke. I reeaaally hope this was a joke.we are in the age where console optimization has overtaken PCs even with superior GPUs. a graphics card alone to get 4 VRAM is what 350ish+
PCGamer put up a 1440p max setting vid on youtube. Youtube has some shit compression, but its something I guess.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrzSBpkxbqw
770 2GB is gonna be fine. It's still an amazing card.
Man, this game is basically Batman. And those ground textures look so flat...
*sigh* This thread only makes me more aware that my good old trusty gtx 460 1 GB has to be put down and replaced soon. You had a good run boy, a very good run..........
Ahahaha
Come on. Give it up. No one has to justify buying that piece of trash anymore with the 970 available. People still flying the 2GB flag at this point are damaging the PC platform and they've already done enough damage as it is.
Move on. Concede defeat.
What the fuck is this? Are you actually upset that the developers made a PC version that takes advantage of high end hardware? Come on.Well, I guess WB just saved me 60$. I can't even say how much I love when publishers doing such a nice thing. THANK YOU WB. THANK YOU SO MUCH!
I'm pretty sure xbox one will have 720p or some weird ass resolution.I can't imagine that this is a very well optimised game or utilises system memory (DDR3) as well as it should. Then again, if textures on PC are significantly more detailed than on consoles then 6GB makes sense. I mean, XBOne only has 32MB of fast RAM, the rest is what, twice the throughput of basic PC DDR3? Also, there's what 5GB max available for entire games after the OS is taken into account?
muh optimization
Well, was a bit shocked at first but it makes sense if these textures are super-highres. Will wait for a comparison before judging. And all those people in here crying about the 700/900 cards being obsolete etc - hilarious
At worst, min PC spec will be PS4/X1 comparably.So, you buy a new 500$ 980 card but "its not enough" for this game.
What a joke. I guess in 6 months an i5 with 16GB ram and a 980 is going to be the minimum requirement, eh developers?
STOP. Once again, X resolution does not quarrelate to Y VRAM. Never has and never will. The sooner people stop regurgitating this the better.battlefield 4 @ 5120x2880 maxed uses/caches 5.5gb vram, I don't believe this figure one bit
I had interest in playing it before this nonsense and reviews was published. But now, I can spend 60$ on something else..So aggro, not even sure what you are doing in this thread when you have no interest in the game nor any ways to play it.
This is some real butthurt here. Guys, don't punish developers who go out of their way to make a good PC version of their game, including PC-exclusive settings, by complaining that you can't max out everything. If you'd rather have a straight console to PC port, keep complaining - what other reaction do you think a developer would have?
What the fuck is this? Are you actually upset that the developers made a PC version that takes advantage of high end hardware? Come on.
Ahahaha
Come on. Give it up. No one has to justify buying that piece of trash anymore with the 970 available. People still flying the 2GB flag at this point are damaging the PC platform and they've already done enough damage as it is.
Move on. Concede defeat.
What the fuck is this? Are you actually upset that the developers made a PC version that takes advantage of high end hardware? Come on.
Yeah they've definitely put a lot of thought and extra effort into this. Good job guys!Damn, that's a really nice looking options menu. Lots of info, laid out very well. Kinda makes me want to buy the game, honestly.
I'm not going to be upgrading from my 4 GB card anytime soon, but stuff like this will definitely influence my next purchase.
What the fuck is this? Are you actually upset that the developers made a PC version that takes advantage of high end hardware? Come on.
Phew... Made the right choice for my setup with my PS4 preorder then.
Man! Even dual GTX 970s isn't hitting that ram req.
These GPU vendors need to stop cheaping out on ram. If a goddamn $399 PS4 can have 8 gigs of GDDR5 then what excuse does a $350 GPU have for only containing 2GB.
With 6gb I'd expect textures to look like real life, or high end AAA cg at the least.
Phew... Made the right choice for my setup with my PS4 preorder then.
Man! Even dual GTX 970s isn't hitting that ram req.
These GPU vendors need to stop cheaping out on ram. If a goddamn $399 PS4 can have 8 gigs of GDDR5 then what excuse does a $350 GPU have for only containing 2GB.
Phew... Made the right choice for my setup with my PS4 preorder then.
Man! Even dual GTX 970s isn't hitting that ram req.
These GPU vendors need to stop cheaping out on ram. If a goddamn $399 PS4 can have 8 gigs of GDDR5 then what excuse does a $350 GPU have for only containing 2GB.
With 6gb I'd expect textures to look like real life, or high end AAA cg at the least.
Dual GTX970 is 8GB... now come on. 350 dollars GPU ? 320 dollars GTX970 is 4GB.
I'd be curious to see your setup, jjust to see how much you're making out of it.
350 dollars GPU also have 3 times more raw performance than your PS4. It's not only about ram you know ?