thiscoldblack
Unconfirmed Member
Definitely getting for PC.
I wish we would get another Alpha game instead, though.
I wish we would get another Alpha game instead, though.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Street Fighter 5 for PS4 & PC teaser trailer
- Thread starter UnluckyKate
- Start date
I agree with both of these statements. I'm also a bit underwhelmed going by the art style alone.
Statements like these, however, cheer me up a bit again:
Let's hope so!
Edit: sheesh, this thread is moving fast!
MastorofPuppetz
Banned
Amazes me people still post the "Sony is too poor" garbage. They can invest billions in R&D for consoles and many other projects but cannot pay for exclusives??? Logic.
Principate
Saint Titanfall
I said this with Titanfall, plenty of people still pointed to the pc release meaning it wasn't a true exclusive.
I guess it's easier to do with Fighters.
IntelliHeath
As in "Heathcliff"
It was a quite nice trailer, so I'm definitely looking forward to see more from SFV.
I have been planning to buy PS4 but if it come out before other games that I want to buy then I might buy PS4 sooner than I would imagine to.
I have been planning to buy PS4 but if it come out before other games that I want to buy then I might buy PS4 sooner than I would imagine to.
Phoenician_Viking
Banned
Moneyhatting exclusives is such a crappy and anti consumerist business model.
It would be exactly the same, just with different faces behind the stances on the matter. As it has always been and will always be on such things on a gaming forum.
Can you honestly say your feelings on the matter would be the same in said hypothetical scenario?
Uuuuuuuuuuuh...
What the fuck is this?
Matt Attack
Member
Holy wow, what a good surprise to wake up to.
The Omega Man
Member
You might want to clarify were that took place, otherwise people might get confused and think you are talking global numbers that at the end of the day it's what matters.
Shadow Ranger
Member
Misterinenja
Member
Rationalize your selective outrage when it comes to console exclusives as much as you want brehs.
Dat goalpost shifting.
Before this trailer, it was "Sony can't afford third party exclusives!" full stop.
D
Deleted member 17706
Unconfirmed Member
I must say it is kind of interesting to see the general reaction (having read the first 10 pages) to this compared to the Tomb Raider exclusivity announcement. Now, I can't say if it's the same people posting, of course, but the general atmosphere of the thread seems markedly different. People still really love to hate the Xbone, it appears.
I guess I can't blame them. The future we would've got if Microsoft had gotten their way would've been a pretty bad one. Partially because of that, I've got next to zero interest in supporting the system, either, but just thought it was interesting to note the reaction here.
I guess I can't blame them. The future we would've got if Microsoft had gotten their way would've been a pretty bad one. Partially because of that, I've got next to zero interest in supporting the system, either, but just thought it was interesting to note the reaction here.
Hellsing321
Member
As long as it's coming to PC I'm happy.
The exclusivity is a bummer I'm sure but I wouldn't be surprised if there were funding issue for Ono.
He had a hell of a time trying to convince Capcom to make SF4 and his recent comments definitely made it sound like Capcom was reluctant when it came to fighting games. I don't think Sony would have the money (or desire) to outright money hat the game.
So yeah, I'm glad that Ono did whatever it took to get the game made.
He had a hell of a time trying to convince Capcom to make SF4 and his recent comments definitely made it sound like Capcom was reluctant when it came to fighting games. I don't think Sony would have the money (or desire) to outright money hat the game.
So yeah, I'm glad that Ono did whatever it took to get the game made.
Ol No Bones
Banned
Nice particle effects.
Well the only other options are
- Gabe asks to be in on the party
- Sony asks and Capcom says yes, with nothing changing hands
It is more likely that there was a monetary deal made between Sony and Capcom, but not for very much compared to what I'll describe as top moneyhat. The PC as a platform now does fairly decently; to actually cut it out as well would likely add to how much would need to be paid or involved in the deal
Guys, how about we wait for the official reveal and press release before jumping at each other's throats? For all we know this might be console exclusive only in Japan or a timed exclusive. Maybe Capcom wouldn't have started developing SF V as soon as they did had Sony not stepped in? Let's wait for more news and then discuss, we are not gonna get anywhere right now because it's just speculation.
If only it was moneyhatted to begin with.
gamechanger87
Member
I'm just trying to figure out what the markets appetite is for a full retail priced fighting game. What was the last massively successful one?
Didn't SF4 sell 3.5M units across 360, PC, PS3 and mobile back in 2009? Is the market still willing to drop $60 on a fighter?
I'm not referring to the die hard fans, just everyone else. I'm not a big fighter guy, but I messed around in KI for a bit because it was essentially F2P.
Street Fighter has aight sales, and it's the quintessential fighting game.
So anything less and you're going to get mild shrugs and a bunch of "who??"s.
vpance
Member
Sony has no money. This is a pure Japanese honor hookup.
Krusenstern
Banned
I really believe they are. All they can moneyhat is indies.
What goalpost shifting? I never said nor believed that Sony can't fund third party exclusives.
It's on the console du jour so be prepared to hear about you shouldn't worry about it.
Yeah the timing could not be more obvious. That said, this is not Soul Calibur, where an installment would be "one and done" on consoles. There are probably going to be at least two more revisions with retail releases. It probably ends up on Xbox One at some point. The return on keeping Hyper Alpha Edition exclusive would be too small.
JetBlackPanda
Member
It is but if your competitor is in the business of doing it you mind of have to play along.
Also both companies are guilty of this over the years.
Sammy Samusu
Member
Well I don't give a fuck about Xbox or Street Fighter, but it's nice to see Capcom supporting PC!
Principate
Saint Titanfall
I'm sure that face is straight. I'm not even a fan of XB1 but I can see the clear difference. I'm not condemning it but it certainly does exist.
BlackVenom
Banned
Jezus, guys stop it so much salt.
Here is a glass of water for your dry mouth.
Here is a glass of water for your dry mouth.
Polioliolio
Member
Yeah, popped in to see the new style.. Doh! It's the same big meaty claws thing from SF4! Lame!
El_Cinefilo
Member
Pretty much this,
and people disputing that Capcom didn't have the money to make a new Street Fighter without investment, you're probably right they almost certainly would have still made a multi(console)-platform Street Fighter 5 without Sony money, It may have taken longer to come out and ended up being F2P though.
or not, it's all pointless speculation everyones getting angry about.
Youre right, I just kind of meant that as a series, TR is not even anywhere near the same level as Street Fighter. There are far less fans of TR than SF. So this exclusive deal has far more damaging effects, IMO.
Either way, I think exclusivity is fucking shitty and PS4 guys need to step up and say that too. I understand that you all are super hype about getting one for your console, but in the grand scheme of things, dont settle for this shit.
It's already on the disc.
Pretty much.
Is this one of the announcements you knew about?
Boombloxer
Member
LOL
The FGC still plays old-school SSFT2 and MvC2. The majority moves on when the new game comes out, but a lot of the older games are still played.
SF is not Smash Bros.
KI is not comparable to SF. I totally get why people would be upset.
Chobel
Member
In the first deal one game is exclusive to the console with the lowest install base, in the other the game is exclusive to the console with the highest install base, PC and arcade machines. Sure it sucks but financially the second business deal is way better than the first one. Sure it's not as good as going fully multipats, but Capcom still made a way better decision than SE.
Irishmantis
Member
People are getting this wrong
its not like Titanfall and Tomb Raider where they where announced on BOTH and THEN later changed
especially when TR was a full story sequel (lol do not attempt to use SFs story )
This is more like what MS did with Killer Instinct
a well known FG franchises ip is now exclusive to Sony being FIRST revealed!
"Not Its on Xbox1 too, actually never mind its not" they didn't build up XBox fans excitement and then take it away
is it a Dick move to an extent yes, both its not the same argument as Tomb Raider
its not like Titanfall and Tomb Raider where they where announced on BOTH and THEN later changed
especially when TR was a full story sequel (lol do not attempt to use SFs story )
This is more like what MS did with Killer Instinct
a well known FG franchises ip is now exclusive to Sony being FIRST revealed!
"Not Its on Xbox1 too, actually never mind its not" they didn't build up XBox fans excitement and then take it away
is it a Dick move to an extent yes, both its not the same argument as Tomb Raider