• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (PC/XB1/PS4) reveal trailer, screens, info, more [Read OP]

It amazes me that people don't want browser support when games like CSGO offer official ranked servers and the ability to host your own plus whatever files you want.
 

EatMyFace

Banned
What they can do is offer both. That way people that cant figure out browsers can click the DURRR button, and the rest of us can play the game the way we want.

If server browsers are so hard for you, you should probably stick to console gaming. Enjoy sitting lobbies and waiting for game to start. Two maps to vote for and neither you want. Then as the lobby counts down people leave so the count down timer has to start all over again. God that sounds so fun. I cant wait to experience that again from blops 2. Absolutely exciting.
I will stick to consoles thank you very much. As for sitting in lobbies, I don't. COD games have the quickest matchmaking I've seen.(on console of course)

BTW, the lobby countdown doesn't restart when people leave. Not on console. There is actually a decent enough player base that those who leave are instantly replaced by another match.

If you want browser on COD then feel free to make a petition. I doubt you'll get many to sign it though. Many of us prefer the DURRRR button.

EDIT: Think about it this way, do you think its a good idea to have people sort through thousands of custom playlists just to find a match? Most don't. COD is primary a console game and there's where the fanbase is at. Considering the games continue to sell millions and million every year and I've never heard anyone complain about playlists.

You want to create a custom playlist that bans some guns/perks/killstreaks/maps...etc, right? That's what I'm getting from your posts.

All I'm trying to say here is that I disagree about this being a necessary feature, especially on console.
 

Ame

Member
glbRf1i.gif

My feelings exactly.

I haven't purchased a COD game since the first Black Ops. When AW launched last year, I decided to dive back in. Didn't like the chaotic pace exo suits introduced, traded it in a couple of weeks later. Watched the Black Ops III reveal trailer and was still skeptical due to the boost jumping and such.

These two bullet points are kinda making come around.
  • Balanced BO2 matchmaking returns, not the skill-based matchmaking from AW
  • Maps are not vertical like AW’s, all about keeping the action at ground level
 

Nabs

Member
It amazes me that people don't want browser support when games like CSGO offer official ranked servers and the ability to host your own plus whatever files you want.

I wouldn't mind both. Just let me use the playlist/matchmaking feature for TDM/KC with my friends on Treyarch servers, and have community dedicated servers as an option. I'm generally a fan of player run dedicated servers, but the COD community really pissed me off me during the Blops 1 days. I got kicked/banned daily for either being better than whoever, or... for jumping. I'm not even talking about those stupid-ass crouch-only servers, regular HCTDM servers would ban or kick me for pressing the space bar. It was incredibly annoying.
 

Deadbeat

Banned
EDIT: Think about it this way, do you think its a good idea to have people sort through thousands of custom playlists just to find a match? Most don't. COD is primary a console game and there's where the fanbase is at. Considering the games continue to sell millions and million every year and I've never heard anyone complain about playlists.

You want to create a custom playlist that bans some guns/perks/killstreaks/maps...etc, right? That's what I'm getting from your posts.

All I'm trying to say here is that I disagree about this being a necessary feature, especially on console.
Cod 4 did great on PC and thousands of people are still playing it just fine. I can boot it up, join a server, and play until I am bored. Thats what servers bring. I can select what I want. Its not confusing or hard. thats what allows games to last. You arent bound to a population of a playlist, but the population of the entire community.

If a browser is too confusing for you (with the statement you made it obviously is) then I guess you cant handle features.
I wouldn't mind both. Just let me use the playlist/matchmaking feature for TDM/KC with my friends on Treyarch servers, and have community dedicated servers as an option. I'm generally a fan of player run dedicated servers, but the COD community really pissed me off me during the Blops 1 days. I got kicked/banned daily for either being better than whoever, or... for jumping. I'm not even talking about those stupid-ass crouch-only servers, regular HCTDM servers would ban or kick me for pressing the space bar. It was incredibly annoying.
Why were older PC games able to function with server browsers then if this was such a huge problem? Because it wasnt a problem. It was a small group of people in the corner.
 

DOWN

Banned
Not true. Shadow of Mordor on last-gen had a seriously watered-down version of the Nemesis system, which was the game's main selling point. Instead of holding the game back on current gen, the 360 & PS3 versions suffered so current-gen could shine.

From GamesRadar: "Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor developer Monolith Productions told IGN today that they’re focusing more heavily on the Xbox One and PS4 versions of the game. Specifically, the game’s ambitious AI system, dubbed “Nemesis,” will be somewhat diluted in the previous-generation versions, because they’re just not quite equipped to handle it. Considering that the developers have specifically referenced the Nemesis system as the game's big, next-gen feature, this makes sense."

Activision/Treyarch probably want to push the boundaries on current gen to get people to finally upgrade. Less players on old consoles = bigger player base spread across fewer platforms. At any rate, only current-gen and PC versions of BO3 have been confirmed so far.
The very clear exception that proves the rule exists. Bad ports like that are exactly why development isn't handled Shadow of Mordor style for cross gen.
 

EatMyFace

Banned
I wouldn't mind both. Just let me use the playlist/matchmaking feature for TDM/KC with my friends on Treyarch servers, and have community dedicated servers as an option. I'm generally a fan of player run dedicated servers, but the COD community really pissed me off me during the Blops 1 days. I got kicked/banned daily for either being better than whoever, or... for jumping. I'm not even talking about those stupid-ass crouch-only servers, regular HCTDM servers would ban or kick me for pressing the space bar. It was incredibly annoying.
This is exactly the kind of thing that I don't understand why people would want it in COD.(or any game really)
 

EatMyFace

Banned
Cod 4 did great on PC and thousands of people are still playing it just fine. I can boot it up, join a server, and play until I am bored. Thats what servers bring. I can select what I want. Its not confusing or hard. If it is then I guess you cant handle features.
I never said its confusing or hard. I'm not stupid.

I said its unnecessary. It's much better to just click on a game mode you want to play and it has all the maps and everything enabled, how the developers intended.

Hope you get your server browsers on PC. I just don't want it on console.
 

Nabs

Member
This is exactly the kind of thing that I don't understand why people would want it in COD.(or any game really)

Well, player operated dedicated servers are generally good places to create and maintain a community. You'll be able to go back to that same 25ms server and see many of the same faces, and know you're in a place that won't tolerate bullshit and all that. The negative feelings I have towards Blops 1 comes directly from that particular community. Even though I have a ton of bad experiences, I still had a few servers that I could call home. I'll take that over your average p2p connection any day of the week.
 

Deadbeat

Banned
I said its unnecessary. It's much better to just click on a game mode you want to play and it has all the maps and everything enabled, how the developers intended.
But you dont get all the maps. I have never played certain maps in blops 2 ever. I never have. Because people never go near them because of thee lobby system.

In blops 1, I play on a server that rotates through all the maps. Thats something I never experienced in blops 2.

I have no problem with consoles having lobbies. Consoles are meant to be restricted and locked down with little features or control. Thats what consoles are for. PCs have options. Thats why I play on them. I just want the PC version to have a server browser because it works in the PC community. It has for decades.
 
All I'm trying to say here is that I disagree about this being a necessary feature, especially on console.

Sorry, but it is. All of the console games I've gotten serious into multiplayer have had server browsers. SOCOM 1-CA, Star Wars: Battlefront 1/2, Warhawk, Battlefield 3/4.

Having a server browser, in addition to quick match, greatly improves the end user experience by allowing you to pick your own server based on relative ping, location, rules, maps, modes. I get more consistent connections playing Battlefield 4 than I do Advanced Warfare.
 

biteren

Member
Sorry, but it is. All of the console games I've gotten serious into multiplayer have had server browsers. SOCOM 1-CA, Star Wars: Battlefront 1/2, Warhawk, Battlefield 3/4.

Having a server browser, in addition to quick match, greatly improves the end user experience by allowing you to pick your own server based on relative ping, location, rules, maps, modes. I get more consistent connections playing Battlefield 4 than I do Advanced Warfare.

i gotta agree here, having server browser would be great
 

This is so me right now. I was extremely convinced that after Advanced Warfare didn't grab me, I must just be done with CoD. I heard "Black Ops 3" and was like "Nope. Definitely out". Then I see the trailer. Cyborg action? Wall running?? MOBA style character classes for MP??? Customizable main character?!!?? I have no choice but to pay attention now.
 

Jaeger

Member
I'm getting more and more excited. Unlike some, I really love the future soldier themes. I mean, we got 4 games with "modern" themes. 4-5 games with early to mid 1900s weaponry and themes. And we get 1 and a half sci-fi themes And people flip out. I don't get it.
 

DOWN

Banned
I'm getting more and more excited. Unlike some, I really love the future soldier themes. I mean, we got 4 games with "modern" themes. 4-5 games with early to mid 1900s weaponry and themes. And we get 1 and a half sci-fi themes And people flip out. I don't get it.
Because when it rains money from a game trend, it pours. We've got a lot of future FPS games now.
 

ShutterMunster

Junior Member
Here's a more robust list of new info since yesterday. Lots to take in.

Campaign
Co-op
Multiplayer
Zombies
New Functionality/Modes
Movement System
PC Version

I'm very surprised by this. It is a radical departure from the Call of Duty formula in many ways. I watched the trailer and was thoroughly confused by it all and the more I read the more I'm intrigued.
 
I'm very surprised by this. It is a radical departure from the Call of Duty formula in many ways. I watched the trailer and was thoroughly confused by it all and the more I read the more I'm intrigued.

I swear to god this happens in every COD, the details makes it sound like its going to be great, but then when you see the game is just looks like typical COD.
KOTICK!!!
skYOFwB.gif

but yeah this one does look like it could finally change the formula.
 

Northeastmonk

Gold Member
I saw the regular edition and the $99.99 edition were up for pre-order on PSN. I wonder what the theme looks like.

$49.99 season pass and AW BO3 content.
 

Jaeger

Member
I swear to god this happens in every COD, the details makes it sound like its going to be great, but then when you see the game is just looks like typical COD.
KOTICK!!!
skYOFwB.gif

but yeah this one does look like it could finally change the formula.

But they arent all the same. Hence why very vocal people ITT didn't play/like AW for whatever their reasons. Black Ops plays nothing like AW, or WaW, or MW2 etc.
 

TheShocker

Member
Am I reading right that you select a "pre-selected" character for MP matches? As in you can't customize your MP player anymore? Sorry if it's been addressed, I'm not familiar with MOBA games and how they work.
 

Creaking

He touched the black heart of a mod
I'm all right with the melee change, though I also liked how the knife in Black Ops II had a more precise range of use, and didn't home in as much. Required just a little more finesse to use compared to the other games.

I'm guessing the tactical knife attachment will be more valuable than ever now. If that /is/ indeed going to be available.

Am I reading right that you select a "pre-selected" character for MP matches? As in you can't customize your MP player anymore? Sorry if it's been addressed, I'm not familiar with MOBA games and how they work.

Selecting characters for Multiplayer doesn't suddenly turn Call of Duty into a MOBA. In any case, I'm pretty sure those characters will be customizable in and of themselves. Perhaps not to the degree of the campaign main character, but they're pushing customization harder than ever. And I don't think they want a multiplayer match where everyone looks like the same person.
 

algert

Banned
Well, player operated dedicated servers are generally good places to create and maintain a community. You'll be able to go back to that same 25ms server and see many of the same faces, and know you're in a place that won't tolerate bullshit and all that. The negative feelings I have towards Blops 1 comes directly from that particular community. Even though I have a ton of bad experiences, I still had a few servers that I could call home. I'll take that over your average p2p connection any day of the week.

The difference between matchmaking and a server browser is in automating the process of finding a suitable game, it has nothing to do with whether there's a player host or not.
 

Overboost

Member
Selecting characters for Multiplayer doesn't suddenly turn Call of Duty into a MOBA. In any case, I'm pretty sure those characters will be customizable in and of themselves. Perhaps not to the degree of the campaign main character, but they're pushing customization harder than ever. And I don't think they want a multiplayer match where everyone looks like the same person.
Correct. Drift0r made a 16-minute video detailing how the Specialist system works. He played every Specialist character available and tried every ability during the hands-on event at Treyarch. Everything is super customizable as usual, plus now you get this extra layer to your character with a specific weapon or ability (you can only pick one):

"I want to make it clear that you still load in with all of your Create-a-Class stuff. You're not trading in your weapons, you're not trading in perks, you're not trading in anything else. You still load in just like a normal Call of Duty game. You choose your guns, you choose your perks, your loadouts, your customization, all of that sort of stuff and it's pretty straightforward, except..."
 

Alienous

Member
Map design will be really important in this, since they are sticking with elevated jumps.

You can't simply design a map like a real-world place. Real-world places place walls, windows and barricades (like, say, a broken down van) with an implicit concept of the height at which people traverse things; a wall in a map doesn't seperate players as much as it does in most shooters if you can quickly leap over it, and windows become accessible entry points rather than just viewpoints for the building's occupier.

They're really going to have to design some interesting looking maps to capture a Call of Duty-like flow while maintaining the vertical movement.
 
Yeah they sell, but I remember seeing something about sales declining after each new release.

The sales are declining, but CoD still outsells just about everything that comes out. And with Black Ops 3, more people might be returning to the franchise since it's Treyarch, Zombies is back, and Black Ops is a well-known franchise.
 
Yeah I don't believe this. They said the same for AW, and its P2P most of the time.

No rentable server? No server Browser? PC version is not a priority.

The AW devs only said they would be supporting dedicated servers, but never specified in what way or which platforms.

Big difference from the statements Treyarch has been making.

Also one of the Treyarch leads is a huge PC fanboy so there's a reason to believe it.
 

Overboost

Member
Yeah I don't believe this. They said the same for AW, and its P2P most of the time.

No rentable server? No server Browser? PC version is not a priority.
Black Ops 1 and 2 also had dedicated servers for Ranked on PC. It's probably too soon to go into details on server browsers or rentable servers, but they've confirmed there's a dedicated PC team at Treyarch working on the game. Drift0r played it on PC and has his thoughts in this video... says he'll probably be buying the PC version.
 

CryptiK

Member
The AW devs only said they would be supporting dedicated servers, but never specified in what way or which platforms.

Big difference from the statements Treyarch has been making.

Also one of the Treyarch leads is a huge PC fanboy so there's a reason to believe it.
If he is why don't the PC players have the essentials? A server browser has been what the PC community has been asking for ever since they removed it. That and rentable servers.

Black Ops 1 and 2 also had dedicated servers for Ranked on PC. It's probably too soon to go into details on server browsers or rentable servers, but they've confirmed there's a dedicated PC team at Treyarch working on the game. Drift0r played it on PC and has his thoughts in this video... says he'll probably be buying the PC version.

BO2 was P2P at the start. Dedicated servers took ages to come in. And even then private servers were P2P. And yeah I don't believe anything from someone that makes money playing CoD on a youtube channel. They aren't exactly going to bite the hand that feeds them.
 

Bishop89

Member
MP playable at E3 confirmed (bodes well for Treyarch's confidence)
Dont think we should give them that much credit.
Dont forget the 3 year cycle is new. If this was the normal cycle, they should have revealed their MP around september last year, so if anything they will be like 8 months over the usual timeframe.

Thrust jumps are reportedly very subtle, slow, and nothing like AW’s vertical boost jumps
No side-boosting, reverse-boosting, or forward-boosting like AW’s Exo boosts
Gameplay is "feet on the ground 90% of the time"
zzz-gifhmmmaybe_thumb%25255B1%25255D.gif

Guess im back in.....
 

aravuus

Member
Here's a more robust list of new info since yesterday. Lots to take in.

Well I mean

Fuck

I instantly dismissed the game when I heard about the movement, but this is starting to sound pretty amazing

I can't afford pre-ordering so no beta for me, but I guess the holidays are reserved for CoD this year too
 

Nokterian

Member
Yeah I don't believe this. They said the same for AW, and its P2P most of the time.

No rentable server? No server Browser? PC version is not a priority.

Black Ops 1 and 2 also had dedicated servers ranked. AW was made by sledgehammer and their approach on PC was at modest good but not like Treyarch at least they have a good legacy on PC for a longtime.
 
Top Bottom