She's gorgeous, I take her over Gadot anyday.
Wow, that looks staggeringly awful
neogaf.gif
She's gorgeous, I take her over Gadot anyday.
Wow, that looks staggeringly awful
Lol, is this a mock up? I don't see it on RT's actual listing
He probably would have been on contract to not appear in any Marvel movies.It's hard to think Green Lantern only happened a couple of years ago.
I wonder if the movie had been successful of Ryan would have made Deadpool and instead been focusing on the DCEU.
Weird times.
You can say that for any movie. Or any other professional job really.so it seems the dceu really just needed a woman to get the job done. i'm sure that'll be a headline.
That's really not why DC went with Green Lantern in that situation. Pretty sure it's because Green Lantern basically became Geoff Johns's love project and he was given, at that time, a very large part of creative control over DC's film output (I don't know if he still does that or is more regulated to television). I think there was a lot of thought at the time from several people that GL had became way more popular than he was.
There are at least 7 things that make this not real, including that it takes the reviews from Beauty and the Beast, the borders and fonts are wrong, etc.
My super secret friend of a friend of a former roommate's cousin inside source is telling me that Wonder Woman is a mess. The studio is worried that the "too good" reviews will make people think it's some sort of indie film geared toward Hollywood insiders, and they are ordering massive reshoots between now and the Friday release in hopes to fundamentally change the nature of the film. The goal is to bring reviews only slightly down in order for the film to feel more "accessible" to a mass audience.
Changes being implemented are as follows:
-Inserting about a dozen quick scenes to give WW a snappy new catch phrase. They are still shopping ideas, but the front runner right now is "I'm not your dream girl, I'm your worst nightmare" and also being considered is something where the bad guys will say "you fight like a girl" and she responds "No, I fight like a woman" before knocking them out in a single blow.
-Steve Trevor is being rewritten into a comedic foil, often tripping on things and giving away secrets to the bad guys with his unfiltered loudmouth. But mostly he will keep trying to impress wonder woman romantically in comedic ways that back fire.
-They are cutting about half the action and inserting romantic comedy scenes because test audiences thought the movie was too "gritty" and "dark". These mostly revolve around them trying to come up with the perfect coffee shop acoustic guitar set, which is going to be very "quirky". Hanz Zimmer is reportedly coming out of retirement to work with Vampire Weekend on the songs.
-Steve Trevor is being recast, Seth Rogan is in talks.
-There will be a cameo by Flash and Batman, who at some point travel through time to play pranks on people.
-Wonder Woman will be recast, Amy Schumer is in talks.
-The film will be retitled Love Actually 2: Wonder Woman. Hugh Grant is set to return and be written in as a major character.
-The original film will be included in its entirety on the eventual blu-ray release as a 2 hr long "deleted scene".
-Does anyone else have any sources on this?
It'll be interesting seeing the narrative emerge around JL. I can see it already. It JL is shit it'll be Snyder's fault and Whedon just couldn't right a sinking ship. If Justice League miraculously turns out good/great then I imagine Whedon'll get the lions share of the credit. Regardless of the facts.
And to think at the time RDJ was a huge risk.
The fuck is this shit? haha I could believe it from those blogsOh oh boys.
The fuck is this shit? haha I could believe it from those blogs
Hanz Zimmer is reportedly coming out of retirement to work with Vampire Weekend on the songs.
On another note. I think this thread went up way too damn fast. There are going to be so many comments and pages before shit really kicks off. As of right now. A bit pointless imo.
Wait, don't the reviews drop at 9pm pacific tonight? That's another 11 hours away and we're already at page 9? Looool this gunna be good.
On another note. I think this thread went up way too damn fast. There are going to be so many comments and pages before shit really kicks off. As of right now. A bit pointless imo.
Ah, but that is good.On another note. I think this thread went up way too damn fast. There are going to be so many comments and pages before shit really kicks off. As of right now. A bit pointless imo.
this is dceu gaf, where there's more hype for the review thread than the actual movieWait, don't the reviews drop at 9pm pacific tonight? That's another 11 hours away and we're already at page 9? Looool this gunna be good.
Apparently the Embargo has lifted in Brazil and a few other places
http://movieweb.com/wonder-woman-movie-review/
http://www.criticalhit.net/review/wonder-woman/
Heres two
this is dceu gaf, where there's more hype for the review thread than the actual movie
Well the reviews will be coming out in less then twelve hours but some reviews are popping up already so here we go!
I'll be updating throughout the day
this is dceu gaf, where there's more hype for the review thread than the actual movie
Apparently the Embargo has lifted in Brazil and a few other places
http://movieweb.com/wonder-woman-movie-review/
http://www.criticalhit.net/review/wonder-woman/
Heres two Reviews
Oh great now reviews too are going to undermine the movie by forcing themselves to bring up the other films. Is it too hard to call it a good movie on its own ? Instead of making it sound like it's only good because the rest is bad.
That critics consensus is pretty snarky.
Lol, I don't mean this in a bad way but american movie commercials are hilarious.
Voice-over man with gravelly voice: "It's not only a great superhero film... IT'S A GREAT FILM!!!"
Now if only they still had the "in a world" bit I would be sold even more.
Why exactly would people ignore the cinematic UNIVERSE that DC has made a big deal out of this being a part of?
Warners' first real attempt at a cinematic universe was with George Miller's Justice League Mortal, picking up round 2007/2008. The plan was to start with Justice League and have spin-offs from there. And it would've been concurrent to stand alone movies like Nolan's Batman. But some tax issues in Australia, the writer's strike, and other factors hurt it.
DCU failing once more would be quite funny but i'd take a good superhero movie with a female protag anyday.
Why exactly would people ignore the cinematic UNIVERSE that DC has made a big deal out of this being a part of?
Regardless of how this reviews (I've watched it, and it's as good as people are saying it is)...
The real Geoff Johns/DC Films division doesn't begin in earnest until Aquaman.
>mulher maravilha
So what is Ms Marvel in Portugese?
>mulher maravilha
So what is Ms Marvel in Portugese?
I'm kinda more interested about Aquaman because Wonder Woman hasn't been perceived as a joke character...and even though Aquaman has had a bunch of good stories, and Johns' own run on the New 52 book, it's a chance to turn around people's misconceptions. I'm cautiously optimistic about JL being better than BvS, maybe not as "inspiring" as WW...but Mamoa's Aquaman looks fun, and I've been waiting a good while to have the JL in a live action film so if it could not be the second coming of Suicide Squad that'd be great.
Hopefully it's good, DCEU needs at least one W and if they can at least get one, maybe they can start to salvage the ship after JL.
BvS is worth watching for the world building if you care about the series. The ultimate cut is also a half-decent effort. It's not awful.
Ignore it ? No they shouldn't.
But making it into the headline ? You are reviewing a movie, not an cinematic universe. If the one thing you want to put in your headline is that it doesn't suck like the rest, you are clearly showing it's only good because the rest is bad, and that the movie on its own is not that good.