I'm in a lot of Switch threads and I see similar sentiments from time to time but I'm sure Gaf is no indicator of the general gaming audience, and I agree that I'm not sure this specific thing is worth a thread.
However what I think could be an interesting thread is the discussion about why some people have made it their primary console. Like, a pure hardware comparison to see how many people really need high fidelity TV gaming and how many would rather sacrifice some processing power to enable more convenience and portability.
It is interesting that some people have bought the Switch and made that transition--however many that is on here in various thread. The option to make trade offs in screen size and graphic quality relative to current consoles at the time has always been there with various portables.
I guess some bought it expecting to use it mainly as a console and have been surprised by their usage who would haven't bought it if it was just a new portable from Nintendo.
In any case, I certainly get the appeal for people who fight with TV time with kids, SO, roommates etc, or people with public transit commutes, lots of travel, lots of downtime at work and less free time at home and so forth.
I like mine, but don't really care about portability. We aren't having kids, we have two 55" TVs and both like our alone time so I have plenty of time to game while my SO is working or watching her shows/movies in the next room, no public transit commutes only travel a few times a year etc. So I prefer my high fidelity big screen gaming far more than gaming on a portable so it will never by my main. It's just my Ninendo and some indies and Japanese games box that I'll play mostly on the same TV I play other games.