• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Last Night: IGN Article [Quack Quack Slurp Slurp]

Lime

Member
I’m seeing other game developers fallling for this game’s aesthetics and thinking it’ll be the next cuphead. Misogynism in sheeps clothes
 
LOL @ the posts ITT saying "wait a sec guys he's just targeting the bad, extremist feminists."

How does it feel to be that naïve? Will you be asking Santa Claus for more ethics in your gaming journalism this year?
 
So are we now saying that we only want fiction that we can agree with? I personally don’t agree with the idea of the game but I simply wouldn’t buy it, as I imagine many in here will do the same.

What seems over the top is the constant vilifying of those that are comfortable enough to purchase it, or don’t care enough to let it bother them. The holier than thou attitude is unnecessary. If you don’t like it then don’t support it but constantly ganging up on posters who think otherwise is pointless. There are people in here taking it personal that people are excited for a game that they themselves disagree with. Live and let live and all that.

I didn't say any of those things. Fiction you don't agree with is fine, it can even be illuminating and you're free to enjoy it. However, I take issue with the notion that fiction is totally separate from the real world. It's not. Fiction is always at least somewhat based on reality and it can help shape reality and our understanding of it. Its status as fiction doesn't shield it from any sort of criticism. And that's what I did in my post: I criticized this game and I directed criticism at people who make false correlations in trying to defend this project - for instance, comparing this project to Polanski's movies or Naughty Dog's games, in both cases missing the point that in this particular case the concept is based on GamerGate "ideals"; also, linking the game's concept to its assuredly beautiful visuals, which is a vapid stance on the issue. I didn't say people couldn't buy this product, they're free to do that (though I really believe they shouldn't, since that's my personal stance on the issue - I would never willingly support hate speech).
 

Orayn

Member
If one were to give this guy a charitable assessment of the ideas he wants to tackle...

In a future society where gender roles and reproduction have changed quite a bit, there are bound to be people who feel uncomfortable with the future and long for the old times. This is a case where he might be unknowingly satirizing himself.

Similarly, the question of what we do with ourselves when we don't have to work to survive isn't exactly new or groundbreaking, and it's been previously explored by quite a few science fiction works. This game seemingly approaches it as a problem and a contributing factor to a dystopia (people aren't creative anymore because the artists aren't starving?), but this is a pretty natural thing for someone to explore from an anti-capitalist perspective as well.

In all likelihood the game will handle both topics with the subtlety of a bag of hammers. There's just a possibility we'll be able to see a trace of the more reasonable underlying concepts depending on the execution.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
You know, economists and social scientists (good ones at least) are interested in exploring the unintended consequences of policy or other types of social interventions. What this means is that they might look at a policy with morally good aims that does people a lot of good and ask if there are also negative consequences. They do so not to undermine the policy but to try to figure out whether it can be altered to maintain the benefits while reducing the unintended costs.

A world where "feminism won" whatever that really means would be a better world than we have now but it would have consequences beyond "men and women are equal now" because things are complicated. When social dynamics change people are affected positively and negatively and although it might be a net moral benefit there is nothing inherently wrong with exploring the possible downsides. You would have to in order to improve things. I might be being extremely charitable to Soret in thinking that this was what he was trying to get across in the Vice interview. This is, again, why I am waiting to read criticism of the final game before I decide whether I'm interested in playing it and what the moral ramifications of doing so might be.

Your post is beautiful and great. HONESTLY! But you are forgetting one thing. He said feminism winning leads to dystopia.

Dystopia: A dystopia (from the Greek δυσ- and τόπος, alternatively, cacotopia, kakotopia, or simply anti-utopia) is a community or society that is undesirable or frightening.

This is a huge problem.
 
I honestly could not care less about the dev's politics.

• Ender's Game is still a classic even though Orson Scott Card is a homophobe.
• Chinatown is still a masterpiece even though Roman Polanski is a rapist.
• Revolver is still groundbreaking even though John Lennon beat up women.

Artists are people. They're fucked up and imperfect. Often, that's why they make great art. Boycotting something because you disagree with the creators' politics is great way to seal yourself in a hermetically sealed bubble. But then again, a safe little echo chamber is probably what some of you want.
 
Artists are people. They're fucked up and imperfect. Often, that's why they make great art. Boycotting something because you disagree with the creators' politics is great way to seal yourself in a hermetically sealed bubble. But then again, a safe little echo chamber is probably what some of you want.

What a load of bull shit.
 

Alucrid

Banned
I honestly could not care less about the dev's politics.

  • Ender's Game is still a classic even though Orson Scott Card is a homophobe.
  • Chinatown is still a masterpiece even though Roman Polanski is a rapist.
  • Revolver is still groundbreaking even though John Lennon beat up women.
Artists are people. They're fucked up and imperfect. Often, that's why they make great art. Boycotting something because you disagree with the creators' politics is great way to seal yourself in a hermetically sealed bubble. But then again, a safe little echo chamber is probably what some of you want.

who knew boycotting something could hurt someone so much
 

True Fire

Member
I honestly could not care less about the dev's politics.

• Ender's Game is still a classic even though Orson Scott Card is a homophobe.
• Chinatown is still a masterpiece even though Roman Polanski is a rapist.
• Revolver is still groundbreaking even though John Lennon beat up women.

Artists are people. They're fucked up and imperfect. Often, that's why they make great art. Boycotting something because you disagree with the creators' politics is great way to seal yourself in a hermetically sealed bubble. But then again, a safe little echo chamber is probably what some of you want.

Ender’s Game isn’t a homophobic manifesto.

Chinatown isn’t a rapist manifesto.

John Lennon is a piece of shit.
 
The meme is that oh this is cool I like this (Milkshake duck, The Last Night), but then you immediately find out it supports oppressive or worse views (duck is a Nazi, game is based around the idea of Feminism ruining the world)

Popular thing/person on the internet is discovered to be made by/be a person with reprehensible views.

It's depressingly common.

Ahhh I see. Still not even really well-versed on the whole GamerGate thing either..
 

BiggNife

Member
I honestly could not care less about the dev's politics.

• Ender's Game is still a classic even though Orson Scott Card is a homophobe.
• Chinatown is still a masterpiece even though Roman Polanski is a rapist.
• Revolver is still groundbreaking even though John Lennon beat up women.

Artists are people. They're fucked up and imperfect. Often, that's why they make great art. Boycotting something because you disagree with the creators' politics is great way to seal yourself in a hermetically sealed bubble. But then again, a safe little echo chamber is probably what some of you want.

If you can separate an artist from his politics, then fine! No one's going to stop you! But trying to call out people who disagree as babies who want safe spaces is childish and rude. You don't have to agree with someone else's opinion but you could at least respect it, ffs.
 

True Fire

Member
Artists are people. They're fucked up and imperfect. Often, that's why they make great art. Boycotting something because you disagree with the creators' politics is great way to seal yourself in a hermetically sealed bubble. But then again, a safe little echo chamber is probably what some of you want.

I also wanted to add that this point is complete bullshit and you know it.

Capitalism IS a hermetically sealed bubble. If I don’t like you, I don’t have to buy shit from you. 🤷🏻
 
I honestly could not care less about the dev's politics.

• Ender's Game is still a classic even though Orson Scott Card is a homophobe.
• Chinatown is still a masterpiece even though Roman Polanski is a rapist.
• Revolver is still groundbreaking even though John Lennon beat up women.

Artists are people. They're fucked up and imperfect. Often, that's why they make great art. Boycotting something because you disagree with the creators' politics is great way to seal yourself in a hermetically sealed bubble. But then again, a safe little echo chamber is probably what some of you want.

Giving yourself away with the bolded. Just a tip.
 
One of the best looking games to come out if E3 and Ill be picking it up for sure.

image.php
 
There is a difference between enjoying art from a problematic artist and enjoying art which is a reflection of the views of the problematic artist.

Great argument. Truly insightful.

I recognize your username. Aren't you a well known social conservative from GameFAQS or am I thinking of someone else?
 

ZeoVGM

Banned
I honestly could not care less about the dev's politics.

• Ender's Game is still a classic even though Orson Scott Card is a homophobe.
• Chinatown is still a masterpiece even though Roman Polanski is a rapist.
• Revolver is still groundbreaking even though John Lennon beat up women.

No one is arguing the quality, are they?

Boycotting something because you disagree with the creators' politics is great way to seal yourself in a hermetically sealed bubble. But then again, a safe little echo chamber is probably what some of you want.

No. Nope. That's not what is happening here.

Get out of here with this nonsense "disagree with the creators' politics" shit. Misogyny is not "politics." It is not an "opinion." It is factually wrong.

Now, if you can look past that and play this game, that is completely fine. But don't delude yourself. He is a bad person.
 

Foggy

Member
I honestly could not care less about the dev's politics.

• Ender's Game is still a classic even though Orson Scott Card is a homophobe.
• Chinatown is still a masterpiece even though Roman Polanski is a rapist.
• Revolver is still groundbreaking even though John Lennon beat up women.

Artists are people. They're fucked up and imperfect. Often, that's why they make great art. Boycotting something because you disagree with the creators' politics is great way to seal yourself in a hermetically sealed bubble. But then again, a safe little echo chamber is probably what some of you want.

Have fun watching Victor Salva's movies, particularly Clownhouse.

There's obviously a limit to acceptability for reprehensible people, their art, and how one influences the other. Plugging your ears and shouting about echo chambers just makes you sound foolish.
 
There is a difference between enjoying art from a problematic artist and enjoying art which is a reflection of the views of the problematic artist.

I recognize your username. Aren't you a well known social conservative from GameFAQS or am I thinking of someone else?

We know next to nothing about the content of this game. I guess I'd argue for waiting to see what the game actually is before writing it off. And lol, no I've never posted on GameFAQS.
 

Fantastapotamus

Wrong about commas, wrong about everything
I honestly could not care less about the dev's politics.

• Ender's Game is still a classic even though Orson Scott Card is a homophobe.
• Chinatown is still a masterpiece even though Roman Polanski is a rapist.
• Revolver is still groundbreaking even though John Lennon beat up women.

Artists are people. They're fucked up and imperfect. Often, that's why they make great art. Boycotting something because you disagree with the creators' politics is great way to seal yourself in a hermetically sealed bubble. But then again, a safe little echo chamber is probably what some of you want.

Ender's Game isn't about homosexuality being bad
Chinatown isn't about rape being okay
Revolver isn't about how great it is to beat up women

Try again
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
We know next to nothing about the content of this game. I guess I'd argue for waiting to see what the game actually is before writing it off. And lol, no I've never posted on GameFAQS.

Except he told us what the premise is so.....
 

True Fire

Member
Filtering crap from your life is very differently from living in a safe little echo chamber. I have a pretty good understanding of how shitty the world is, and just because I don’t tolerate other people’s shittiness doesn’t mean my head is in the sand.
 
I honestly could not care less about the dev's politics.

• Ender's Game is still a classic even though Orson Scott Card is a homophobe.
• Chinatown is still a masterpiece even though Roman Polanski is a rapist.
• Revolver is still groundbreaking even though John Lennon beat up women.

Artists are people. They're fucked up and imperfect. Often, that's why they make great art. Boycotting something because you disagree with the creators' politics is great way to seal yourself in a hermetically sealed bubble. But then again, a safe little echo chamber is probably what some of you want.

The. Difference. Is. The. Message. Of. The. Game. Is. Feminism. Is. Objectively. Evil. And. Would. Lead. To. Dystopia.

He has said -- in very clear terms -- that this game is a product of GamerGate.

KmpDjSb.png


He has publicly expressed a desire to have "Vivian James" in his game.

He regularly Likes GamerGate and Alt-right posts on Twitter.


This is a narrative game. The narrative, the themes, the message is the game. This isn't a matter of separating art from the artist. This game has a purpose, an objective. It is to disseminate hateful, vicious, regressive ideas in the form of narrative fiction.

The only way you're okay with that is if you are okay with the ideas GamerGate sought to spread. Full stop.
 

xxracerxx

Don't worry, I'll vouch for them.
We know next to nothing about the content of this game. I guess I'd argue for waiting to see what the game actually is before writing it off. And lol, no I've never posted on GameFAQS.

We know what the game's premise is and after that leaked out after the E3 showing, all we have is a back peddle that we are supposed to take at face value even though the dude that said it has clearly not changed.
 

BiggNife

Member
Giving myself away as...being open to alternative viewpoints?

I'm okay with that.

You say that, yet you're literally not open to the idea of someone choosing not to play a game for a political reason and instead dismiss those people.

And multiple people have pointed out that The Last Night prominently features Soret's toxic views whereas the examples you mentioned do not feature their artists' problematic traits.

The Last Night has more in common with Orson Scott Card's Empire than it does Ender's Game.
 

hey_it's_that_dog

benevolent sexism
Your post is beautiful and great. HONESTLY! But you are forgetting one thing. He said feminism winning leads to dystopia.

Dystopia: A dystopia (from the Greek δυσ- and τόπος, alternatively, cacotopia, kakotopia, or simply anti-utopia) is a community or society that is undesirable or frightening.

This is a huge problem.
Here's the deal. If this game is literally about how feminism was the primary cause of the world falling apart, everything I said is moot and the guy is a dipshit and his game will be garbage.

If, and I think this is more likely the case, the setting is a dystopia in which a number of significant social changes have occurred, only one of which has to do with gender dynamics, then I will reserve judgment based on how it is actually handled, what the game has to say about it, and whether it simply raises questions or takes sides in a clumsy and stupid way.

I doubt that a game will be able to capture all of this stuff in a sophisticated way, but that's a separate issue from any possible political agenda.
 
Ender's Game isn't about homosexuality being bad
Chinatown isn't about rape being okay
Revolver isn't about how great it is to beat up women

Try again

Again, please correct me if I'm wrong, but how do we know what this game is about? The most I've seen are some very vague comments about feminism and dystopia from the creator. Sounds a little weird and possibly offensive, but the dude obviously has a vision, so I'm willing to see where it goes. It's the prejudging that I don't understand.
 

Fantastapotamus

Wrong about commas, wrong about everything
Again, please correct me if I'm wrong, but how do we know what this game is about? The most I've seen are some very vague comments about feminism and dystopia from the creator. Sounds a little weird and possibly offensive, but the dude obviously has a vision, so I'm willing to see where it goes. It's the prejudging that I don't understand.

"vague"
KmpDjSb.png


Edit: Look, if you want to wait for the game to be released, that's fine. I'm not judging you. But to write off everybody that reads and reacts to what the lead developer said about his own game as "living in an echo chamber" while simultaneously boasting about being open to opposing points of view is....weird
 
Again, please correct me if I'm wrong, but how do we know what this game is about? The most I've seen are some very vague comments about feminism and dystopia from the creator. Sounds a little weird and possibly offensive, but the dude obviously has a vision, so I'm willing to see where it goes. It's the prejudging that I don't understand.

Please see the post:

The. Difference. Is. The. Message. Of. The. Game. Is. Feminism. Is. Objectively. Evil. And. Would. Lead. To. Dystopia.

He has said -- in very clear terms -- that this game is a product of GamerGate.

KmpDjSb.png


He has publicly expressed a desire to have "Vivian James" in his game.

He regularly Likes GamerGate and Alt-right posts on Twitter.


This is a narrative game. The narrative, the themes, the message is the game. This isn't a matter of separating art from the artist. This game has a purpose, an objective. It is to disseminate hateful, vicious, regressive ideas in the form of narrative fiction.

The only way you're okay with that is if you are okay with the ideas GamerGate sought to spread. Full stop.
 
The. Difference. Is. The. Message. Of. The. Game. Is. Feminism. Is. Objectively. Evil. And. Would. Lead. To. Dystopia.

He has said -- in very clear terms -- that this game is a product of GamerGate.

KmpDjSb.png


He has publicly expressed a desire to have "Vivian James" in his game.

He regularly Likes GamerGate and Alt-right posts on Twitter.


This is a narrative game. The narrative, the themes, the message is the game. This isn't a matter of separating art from the artist. This game has a purpose, an objective. It is to disseminate hateful, vicious, regressive ideas in the form of narrative fiction.

The only way you're okay with that is if you are okay with the ideas GamerGate sought to spread. Full stop.

Here's the deal. If this game is literally about how feminism was the primary cause of the world falling apart, everything I said is moot and the guy is a dipshit and his game will be garbage.

If, and I think this is more likely the case, the setting is a dystopia in which a number of significant social changes have occurred, only one of which has to do with gender dynamics, then I will reserve judgment based on how it is actually handled, what the game has to say about it, and whether it simply raises questions or takes sides in a clumsy and stupid way.

I doubt that a game will be able to capture all of this stuff in a sophisticated way, but that's a separate issue from any possible political agenda.
I mean, it ain't looking good
 

xxracerxx

Don't worry, I'll vouch for them.
Again, please correct me if I'm wrong, but how do we know what this game is about? The most I've seen are some very vague comments about feminism and dystopia from the creator. Sounds a little weird and possibly offensive, but the dude obviously has a vision, so I'm willing to see where it goes. It's the prejudging that I don't understand.

Vague?

Come the fuck on. Unless you think GamerGate is vague.

KmpDjSb.png
 

ZeoVGM

Banned
I am shocked to see yet another person attack those who are against this game by insulting them, saying they need a "safe space," only to admit they know nothing about the situation, immediately after.
 

Alucrid

Banned
And yet none of this can be derived from the trailer or his recent interview. So simply as a matter of curiosity I want to know what this game actually has in it.

The dude said some stupid shit for sure. That point has been made.

i believe tim soret pre E3 more than i believe tim soret post E3
 
Again, please correct me if I'm wrong, but how do we know what this game is about? The most I've seen are some very vague comments about feminism and dystopia from the creator. Sounds a little weird and possibly offensive, but the dude obviously has a vision, so I'm willing to see where it goes. It's the prejudging that I don't understand.

I have absolutely zero reason to believe you are asking in good faith, but the answer to your question are all over this thread if you would have actually taken the time to read it and educate yourself. But you are just going to either deflect any evidence presented to you or move the goalposts so why bother. Save yourself the trouble.
 
Top Bottom