INCEPTION SOUND!!
wow @ the crysis hate in this thread. thought the trailer looked awesome, don't know what some of you were expecting, if this is just an "expansion pack" almost everyother shooter sequel has to be called an expansion pack too.
o_0
In forest scene there is subpixel aliasing in the distance and shader aliasing on nanosuit, so it was recorded live.
In 1:12 we can see that rocket destroyed part of wall.
There was also frog in the river
BTW that grass moving on the wind looks awesome.
if this is just an "expansion pack" almost everyother shooter sequel has to be called an expansion pack too.
thisisneogaf.jpg
Crysis 2 was one of the best shooters of last year and set a new benchmark for visuals on the PC (top notch visuals + super quick performance). Loved the hell out of it just as I did the original Crysis.
What part doesn't make sense? Seems pretty easy to follow to me?
The graphics were about the only place that Crysis 2 succeeded. It was optimised as shit, also.
I would agree if you said the art style was lacking, because I think the colours and bloom were awful, but play those night levels and tell me it's not fucking stunning, even in DX9.
Man, that trailer sucked. What an awful way to "show" the game.
I absolutely adore the original Crysis, but I felt that Crysis 2 was also an equally great game. The fact that it was different in a number of ways did not detract from what was an excellent sandbox shooter/stealth game.It looked nice, but I can't disagree more on the quality. I thought it was a disappointment overall. I liked the first Crysis and Far Cry, so that made it worse.
The "look" of Crysis 2 was truly incredible, though, and quite an upgrade over the original game.Looks like something straight out of Crysis 2.
Yep, too many flashbacks or something like that. They want to "show" us something like telling "look how awesome and cool I am".
Looks like something straight out of Crysis 2.
wow @ the crysis hate in this thread. thought the trailer looked awesome, don't know what some of you were expecting, if this is just an "expansion pack" almost everyother shooter sequel has to be called an expansion pack too.
DerZuhälter;37235439 said:The grand scale of some events were visually impressive (Collapsing bridge, nighttime alien artillery) but the levels, models, animation and effects were so so. Can't say it blew me away with texture work or effects.
Really? What on earth can you name that bests it from last year?The grand scale of some events were visually impressive (Collapsing bridge, nighttime alien artillery) but the levels, models, animation and effects were so so. Can't say it blew me away with texture work or effects.
Tell me where you find your graphically superior games. You must know of a secret developer or something to believe what you just said, right?
The editing just made it painful.
DerZuhälter;37235746 said:Do I have to list superior games now? Don't get me wrong Crysis 2 is a good looking game, but Crysis 1 and Far Cry blew me away. Crysis 2 didn't, and The Witcher 2 and Battlefield 3 were at least as impressive as Crysis 2.
The graphical gap between "State of the Art" and "good looking" has completley diminished to zero in my eyes. Can't say that any game really impressed me last year.
Outside of CoD, what other shooters?wow @ the crysis hate in this thread. thought the trailer looked awesome, don't know what some of you were expecting, if this is just an "expansion pack" almost everyother shooter sequel has to be called an expansion pack too.
yup, looks like a shooter. Move along.
What an annoying "gameplay" trailer.
I enjoyed Crysis 2, but if this game requires Origin, them I'm not getting it.
I enjoyed Crysis 2, but if this game requires Origin, them I'm not getting it.
INCEPTION SOUND!!
I'm with you. I don't understand people who say they disliked Crysis 2 because it was inferior to Crysis 1 and Farcry. It was inferior to Crysis 1 in more than one aspect (that isn't graphics). Still, it was the best FPS of its year, and by far. The gameplay of Crysis is unmatched as of today and downgrading it a bit only makes it a bit less awesome.I absolutely adore the original Crysis, but I felt that Crysis 2 was also an equally great game. The fact that it was different in a number of ways did not detract from what was an excellent sandbox shooter/stealth game.
I absolutely DETEST the original Far Cry, however. It was a looker for its day, but the core design was absolutely awful with very poor gunplay, atrocious AI, bad mission design, horrible enemy encounters (the Trigen), and various other problems. It was very clearly Crytek's first attempt at really making something and they fell very short. Crysis was a massive shift in terms of quality and I feel Crysis 2 upholds that in a different way.
The "look" of Crysis 2 was truly incredible, though, and quite an upgrade over the original game.
What I'm interested in is seeing how they choose to build levels this time. All of the material we've seen thus far suggests potential for a more open environment that blends some aspects of Crysis 1 with other aspects of Crysis 2 into one package.
It's really pretty, but is it wrong to ask for at least 5 seconds of "solid" gameplay footage? :<
They should call it Vygnetting 3, tunnel vision of doom.
The Vignetting is almost worse than in BF or ME3.
Christ almighty, felt like I was watching a seizure.