• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Nintendo Rep: Pikmin 3, NSMBU, Nintendo Land will ship in 720p (Pikmin 3 is 60fps)

Are people SURE that NSMBU has no AA? Because I'm looking at the screenshots from Nintendo's site, and unless they decided that a 2D Mario of all titles was the game to bullshit graphics with, it definitely does have AA.

NG3 appears to be 1080p (no AA) unless, again, Nintendo decided to bullshit for just one particular game and in one particular field. (though it's still NG3 so well).

bullshots have been par for the course for Ninja Gaiden games, if I remember right, so I wouldn't read too much into that. could be. could not be.
 

RoadHazard

Gold Member
I'm surprised so many people expected 1080p out of this thing. That requires a fairly solid hardware bump and the Wii-U is pretty clearly around the 360ish level of potency with a few pluses and a few minuses.

I'm sure both the PS3 and the 360 could easily run NSMBU @ 1080p60, so no, doing that should require no "solid hardware bump" at all. There's no excuse for it to run at 720p if the Wii U is indeed on par with those consoles.
 

ASTROID2

Member
My guess is these games don't have all the bells and whistles yet. I'm sure there will be AA on these games at release.
 

zroid

Banned
As a PC gamer this is hilarious. If the system even used somewhat modern hardware (anything from the past 4 years) all these games should have been easily 1080p and 60fps.

As a PC gamer (and a console gamer, and a handheld gamer), I do not care a lick about 1080p, 60fps, AA or any of that other jazz.

Give me games that are fun to play and I'll give you money.
 

nordique

Member
No surprises here. I figure all next gen consoles will be doing 720p mainly too, especially to get "better" graphics (more effects) vs. IQ


Btw....has anyone noticed how awesome the lighting effects have been in some of the Nintendo titles? Pikmin 3 and NintendoLand both have exceptional lighting...
 

Vire

Member
As a PC gamer (and a console gamer, and a handheld gamer), I do not care a lick about 1080p, 60fps, AA or any of that other jazz.

Give me games that are fun to play and I'll give you money.

If you are paying close to 300 dollars for a new piece of hardware it is normal to expect some sort of competency.

NSMBU not at 1080p/60fps is inexcusable and downright embarrassing.
 

Christine

Member
Huh really? I never knew that. Kind of suprised they couldn't get the whole thing running at 60, even when the game came out it's (non-water) visuals were slightly underwhelming. Was it the water effects that were so taxing or something?

That's part of it, but another part is that it frequently pushes more polygons than the Galaxy games. Gelato Beach and Noki Bay are probably the best examples.
 

Mistle

Member
Honestly, I really don't care about 1080p over 720p. Just give me the latter looking great and I'm more than happy.

As for NSMBU not being 60fps... I think it will be. They didn't actually say otherwise.
 

zroid

Banned
If you are paying close to 300 dollars for a new piece of hardware it is normal to expect some sort of competency.

NSMBU not at 1080p/60fps is inexcusable and downright embarrassing.

This word is meaningless. If I were to pay close to $300 for a new piece of hardware, it would be normal for me to expect to play games on it that I like. That is all.
 
bullshots have been par for the course for Ninja Gaiden games, if I remember right, so I wouldn't read too much into that. could be. could not be.

Yeah but it's not Team Ninja's usual bullshot fuckridiculous IQ. Nintendo seems to be handling the screenshots this time since they're publishing, so there's jaggies galore.

Okay so here:

iTrCcT1sw4IXP.jpg


There's definitely some AA here.

And Ninja Dog 3:

iyumqfAMg5d1W.JPG


There's aliasing and textures that Tecmo's Lie-O-Matic Screenshot Generator would never allow, and it's the only game in the press packs that is 1080p.
 
If you are paying close to 300 dollars for a new piece of hardware it is normal to expect some sort of competency.

NSMBU not at 1080p/60fps is inexcusable and downright embarrassing.

The mind of a Nintendo fan! Spend money on new hardware! Expect last gen results!

Seriously.... the current consoles could very easily dish out New Mario at 720p at 60fps. And the Wii is suppose to be a step above the HD-twins. So where is that step?

Here's hoping for Nintendo's demise. Their next-gen is just previous gen in new packaging. No Thanks.
 

Vire

Member
This word is meaningless. If I were to pay close to $300 for a new piece of hardware, it would be normal for me to expect to play games on it that I like. That is all.

What's the point of the new hardware then? Why should you have to plop down $300 if it isn't offering anything different other than a means to continue to play new games. The Wii could just as easily run NSMBU.


The mind of a Nintendo fan! Spend money on new hardware! Expect last gen results!

Seriously.... the current consoles could very easily dish out New Mario at 720p at 60fps. And the Wii is suppose to be a step above the HD-twins. So where is that step?

Here's hoping for Nintendo's demise. Their next-gen is just previous gen in new packaging. No Thanks.

I don't understand it...

I don't want Nintendo's demise, I think that's a bit much. I want them to come to their senses.
 

NateDrake

Member
The mind of a Nintendo fan! Spend money on new hardware! Expect last gen results!

Seriously.... the current consoles could very easily dish out New Mario at 720p at 60fps. And the Wii is suppose to be a step above the HD-twins. So where is that step?

Here's hoping for Nintendo's demise. Their next-gen is just previous gen in new packaging. No Thanks.

Enjoy the Xbox 720 and PS4 when you see games at 720p at 60 FPS as standard, with a few being 1080 and running at 30 FPS.

People love overreacting to things...
 

zroid

Banned
The mind of a Nintendo fan! Spend money on new hardware! Expect last gen results!

Erm.

Here's hoping for Nintendo's demise.

Ok.

What's the point of the new hardware then? Why should you have to plop down $300 if it isn't offering anything different other than a means to continue to play new games. The Wii could just as easily run NSMBU.

What's the point? New types of gameplay. New features. New lots of things. Believe it or not, horsepower isn't the only thing that determines the value of new hardware. In many ways, it's the least important thing, because it doesn't really flex the creative muscle of developers very much. It's just a pathway to adding polygons.

The most interesting thing about NSMB U to me, apart from it just looking like a great Mario game, is the Miiverse integration.
 

Diablos54

Member
Here's hoping for Nintendo's demise. Their next-gen is just previous gen in new packaging. No Thanks.
Yea, let's all hope they go out of business because I don't like their new system! Logic at its finest...

And even if the Wii U sold, like, Vita amounts, they'd still wouldn't be going anywhere so you might as well get used to it.
 

Vanillalite

Ask me about the GAF Notebook
The GPU is probably way under clocked (to keep the small case cool) and there just isn't enough fill rate left. That can be the only logical explanation.

Still shouldn't matter for the games we are discussing here. NSMB WiiU isn't exactly going to be killing the fill rate on a machine. Heck the 360's problem just is the embedded RAM isn't large enough for the stuff being pulled in. I'm interesting to hear what 343i has done to get around this fact with the lighting model they are using.

I chalk it up to 3 things.

1) Devs just aren't use to this yet and/or are "lazy" and haven't put the work in
2) Final Dev Kits might just be getting there and/or final passes of things like AA just haven't been applied yet. So it's coming, but it's just in yet
3) The leaked specs aren't actually what the Wii-U really is (I'm still waiting for more confirmation this is the case).
 

Mistle

Member
What's the point of the new hardware then? Why should you have to plop down $300 if it isn't offering anything different other than a means to continue to play new games. The Wii could just as easily run NSMBU.




I don't understand it...
Because the Wii U is capable of much more than the Wii, even if NSMBU isn't the game to show it off. And also, there is that screen thing.
 
Enjoy the Xbox 720 and PS4 when you see games at 720p at 60 FPS as standard, with a few being 1080 and running at 30 FPS.

People love overreacting to things...

If the 540 and the PS4 are still pushing 720p as the baseline I will abandon console gaming. Simple as that.
 

The Boat

Member
The mind of a Nintendo fan! Spend money on new hardware! Expect last gen results!

Seriously.... the current consoles could very easily dish out New Mario at 720p at 60fps. And the Wii is suppose to be a step above the HD-twins. So where is that step?

Here's hoping for Nintendo's demise. Their next-gen is just previous gen in new packaging. No Thanks.
What a fantastic post.
 

MicH

Member
That screenshot from NSMBU a few posts above really looks great. Hopefully it looks just as good in motion.
 
The "leaked specs" still leave us with a huge possible range of CPUs, GPUs, and RAM. Pretty much useless aside from being "better than 360."
 

Vire

Member
Because the Wii U is capable of much more than the Wii, even if NSMBU isn't the game to show it off. And also, there is that screen thing.

Personally, I don't really understand NSMBU as a launch game. It doesn't show off the second screens capabilities or the console's technical prowess. Seems like a poor choice to justify a new system.
 

Mistle

Member
Personally, I don't really understand NSMBU as a launch game. It doesn't show off the second screens capabilities or the console's technical prowess. Seems like a poor choice to justify a new system.
In that sense I don't get it either, but it'll make Nintendo a lot of $$$$$$$$$
 

zroid

Banned
Personally, I don't really understand NSMBU as a launch game. It doesn't show off the second screens capabilities or the console's technical prowess. Seems like a poor choice to justify a new system.

You're right there; the main Wii U hook it has is Miiverse. Your mileage will wary with that, I suppose. I personally think it's pretty rad.
 

dwu8991

Banned
That screenshot from NSMBU a few posts above really looks great. Hopefully it looks just as good in motion.

yeah, it's rubbish that 1080 is better than 720

you would need a tv bigger than 50 inches to really benefit from the extra detail that 1080 brings or sit really close to the tv !!!
 
What's the point of the new hardware then? Why should you have to plop down $300 if it isn't offering anything different other than a means to continue to play new games. The Wii could just as easily run NSMBU.
Nope. They could downgrade it ofcourse
 

Y2Kev

TLG Fan Caretaker Est. 2009
Emcee, the current release of ng3 cannot hold a steady framerate even being an ass game. Having it run on wii u at a higher res is either unlikely or half framerate (or worse).
 

Lambtron

Unconfirmed Member
Man I don't understand this. I have a 720p TV, I'm fine with games at that resolution. I'm sure in a few years I'll buy something bigger and with a higher resolution but meeehhh. It's diminishing returns for me. I don't give two shits if a game is in sub-native upscaled res if it's fun.
 
Emcee, the current release of ng3 cannot hold a steady framerate even being an ass game. Having it run on wii u at a higher res is either unlikely or half framerate (or worse).

Which makes it really odd that it's the only game that Nintendo released screenshots of at 1080p. Not bullshot huge 4k print sizes with 16x AA, 1080p with jaggies and low res motion blur and all. It's a weird exception otherwise.

Did either version of the original garbage run at 1080?
 
I honestly expected NSMBU to run at 1080p...

Doesn't Rayman Origins run at 1080p on PS3 and 360, or at least do something fancy to make it seem like it is? Will Legends run at 1080p (same method or otherwise) on WiiU? Would be a shame if it didn't :/

Though not a massive issue if it doesn't I guess.
 
1600p or nothing nintendo.

I can only judge a game by its native resolution, not its gameplay. Higher the resolution, the better the game etc.
 

bridegur

Member
I have no idea what the excuse is for NSMBU's visuals. Maybe it's just the team, because the Galaxy team's games have always blown the NSMB series away technically and artistically. Hopefully that will remain true for the Wii U.
 
You know... there is a thing called "PC gaming." Where 1080p and 60fps with eye-popping graphics and gameplay are delivered. I don't have to make sacrifices.
Well, to be fair, we get reminded of it every other page in every other console related thread. Plus, we all have a pc. Just not obe tgat does the things you say.
 

Durante

Member
That Mario screenshot is strange. Lots of it is AA'd well, but there's also some really obvious aliasing (look at Luigi's legs). I can only assume some post-processing thing.

I honestly expected NSMBU to run at 1080p...

Doesn't Rayman Origins run at 1080p on PS3 and 360
It does. Also 60 FPS.
 

Krakatoa

Member
Why dont they include a scaler like the Xbox 360 has. Then everyone can run it at what res they want. I know it's not true 1080P but at least it's better than nothing.

smh
 
Personally, I don't really understand NSMBU as a launch game. It doesn't show off the second screens capabilities or the console's technical prowess. Seems like a poor choice to justify a new system.

...It's a "system seller". What's so hard to understand about that? Or do you not realise how much the New Super Mario Bros. games sell?
 
Top Bottom