-Mutsukki-
Member
I mean in more in the fact that if channeling is an accepted part of society then you think it would play a bigger part in the actual murder cases. Being able to assume the identity of a dead person seems like an extremely big deal as far as forensics concern.
Of course, I don't remember the older games too well now but I felt the whole spiritual stuff was more for "flavor" and rarely had plot importance aside from the few cases that involved that community. Yeah, they introduced the Psyche Lock thing but that could have been replaced with anything (like it was with Apollo's bracelet) and things wouldn't be too different.
It was never accepted as part of their society. They never proved chanelling to be reliable through DL-6 either. Besides, there's only 2 chanellers in the country (
and the 3rd who appears and end up dead in AA3 anyway
But chanelling was was always honestly a big element of the series, central plot point in both 1 and 3 (both last cases begin with Maya wanting to train more and not being able to control her channeling) and in 2 where they try to estabilish how they would handle judgement if someone got possessed and killed another person. It showed a more pragmatic approach to it too, as a means of relaying information to Phoenix via Maya and then Pearl.
AA4 tried to fill that void with magic, AA feels kinda empty without a supernatural element.