So HDMI 2.1 and HDR10 Dynamic Metadata are probably going to make current AVR's obsolete, yes? How many manufacturers do we think had the foresight to forward design them to be software upgradable? Have any of them commented on this?
I have the Onkyo TX-NR646. It is 4k and HDR compatible and it supports HDMI 2.0a and HDCP 2.2. It also has Dolby Atmos and DTS-X support. I really like Onkyo, they make really good receivers.
Can cosign.
Great receiver
So HDMI 2.1 and HDR10 Dynamic Metadata are probably going to make current AVR's obsolete, yes? How many manufacturers do we think had the foresight to forward design them to be software upgradable? Have any of them commented on this?
What are the advantages of HDR10 Dynamic Metadata and HDMI 2.1 over what is available on this years receivers and TVs?
Can cosign.
Great receiver
What are the advantages of HDR10 Dynamic Metadata and HDMI 2.1 over what is available on this years receivers and TVs?
The thing about AVR's is BY FAR the biggest differentiator in sound quality is the Auto EQ Mic's and Calibration Suites. Onkyo have pretty unanimously the worst implementation after choosing to drop Audysee for AccuEQ to save costs. Last I checked (last year's models) AccuEQ doesn't/can't/won't apply any EQ or frequency corrections to your front mains, it only EQ's the other speakers to match the mains and does rudimentary volume/distance setup. That is comically stupid, cause if your mains have poor response due to room/positioning/etc (which most do), it just makes everything else equally shitty. They made this change when trying to license Atmos for cheaper and cheaper AVR's. They're just trying to fill out spec and feature sheets at the obvious expense to quality (which apparently works based on the guy's post you quoted). I'd never recommend Onkyo, and that's not even getting into their incredibly wide spread and common multi-model wide defects that fried HDMI boards like KFC fries chicken.
Onkyos are so bad. always have huge issues with their HDMI boards. Last model they released I believe they extended the warranty because of all the issues they had. Maybe it was the line prior. Either way now they are making the Pioneers also >_<;
Yamaha is good ad YPAO is pretty decent, Audessey is good. Best I have ever used is ARC2 from Anthem though. They make amazing separates and AVR's. Kind of curious about Acram and DIRAC, but until won't get one of those for a long time as long as I have my MRX 1120.
That whole thing is madness. I feel like Dolby Vision capable TVs should be upgradable but who the hell knows. I guess we'll see.So HDMI 2.1 and HDR10 Dynamic Metadata are probably going to make current AVR's obsolete, yes? How many manufacturers do we think had the foresight to forward design them to be software upgradable? Have any of them commented on this?
I have the Onkyo TX-NR646. It is 4k and HDR compatible and it supports HDMI 2.0a and HDCP 2.2. It also has Dolby Atmos and DTS-X support. I really like Onkyo, they make really good receivers.
It brings HDR10 up to par with Dolby Vision in that the HDR effect can be adjusted scene by scene or frame by frame greatly improving quality. It's expected to become the defacto standard going forward.
The thing about AVR's is BY FAR the biggest differentiator in sound quality is the Auto EQ Mic's and Calibration Suites. Onkyo have pretty unanimously the worst implementation after choosing to drop Audysee for AccuEQ to save costs. Last I checked (last year's models) AccuEQ doesn't/can't/won't apply any EQ or frequency corrections to your front mains, it only EQ's the other speakers to match the mains and does rudimentary volume/distance setup. That is comically stupid, cause if your mains have poor response due to room/positioning/etc (which most do), it just makes everything else equally shitty. They made this change when trying to license Atmos for cheaper and cheaper AVR's. They're just trying to fill out spec and feature sheets at the obvious expense to quality (which apparently works based on the guy's post you quoted). I'd never recommend Onkyo, and that's not even getting into their incredibly wide spread and common multi-model wide defects that fried HDMI boards like KFC fries chicken.
Hmm...that's a good idea, actually.with the added complications of PSVR, and the processing box not passing through full HDMI colour (never mind 4k or HDR), is it worth looking at receivers with twin outputs? Then you could run one to your TV and one to your PSVR box, ensuring that you can get proper 4k/HDR to your TV without bothering going through the PSVR processing box
with the added complications of PSVR, and the processing box not passing through full HDMI colour (never mind 4k or HDR), is it worth looking at receivers with twin outputs? Then you could run one to your TV and one to your PSVR box, ensuring that you can get proper 4k/HDR to your TV without bothering going through the PSVR processing box
Hmm...that's a good idea, actually.
I use this feature for capturing games and it works very well.
That said, it might not work with the PSVR itself since it does seem sensitive.
After starting this thread, i think i've decided on this bad boy:
DENON AVRX2300W
http://www.richersounds.com/product/av-receivers/denon/avrx2300w/deno-avrx2300-blk
ANy first hand reviews for HDR?
Save ur money and just hdmi PRO to TV, TV optical to AVR.
The Denon AVR-S710W and 720W are both 4K, HDR, 2.0a. Hdcp 2.2 right?
You can do the regular DD and DTS, just not PCM 5.1 (no Tv can output 5.1 PCM at the moment). DTS is good enough for me. Also some may say you get less input lag if you hdmi straight from Gaming Console to TV instead by pass an AVR.You can't do Dolby HD or dts hd over optical.
I have the 720w with an LG B6 OLED, PS4 Pro, XB1 S and the Samsung UHD player - no issues at all passing 4K and HDR.
Save ur money and just hdmi PRO to TV, TV optical to AVR.
You can do the regular DD and DTS, just not PCM 5.1 (no Tv can output 5.1 PCM at the moment). DTS is good enough for me. Also some may say you get less input lag if you hdmi straight from Gaming Console to TV instead by pass an AVR.
There are some 4K passthrough receiver with good price out right now, but if you want a 4K receiver with HDMI 2.0, you'll need to spend and lot more money to upgrade. IMO, it's not really worth it for me.
Thanks great to hear.
What about the denon avr-s510bt? I've been confused if the s510bt is 2.0a HDR capable. Anyone know?
My understanding is that the 510bt was supposed to be updateable to 2.0a. As of September I'm not aware of any update that released for it to enable 2.0a compatibility. If that's what your looking for, I'd see if they've released anything as of yet. If not, I'd look elsewhere.
Bumping this thread...can people post their setup (TV & AVR) and confirm the PS4 Pro is working as it should with 4K, HDR?
LG E6 OLED
Pioneer Elite VSX45
PS4 Pro is not playing nice with my Avr. It only detects 1080p as video output, not 4K. Connecting direct into my tv works fine.
I have the 720w with an LG B6 OLED, PS4 Pro, XB1 S and the Samsung UHD player - no issues at all passing 4K and HDR.
LG B6 OLED
Pioneer VSX-1130-K
Works fine w/ 4k + hdr w/ the ps4 pro.
One time I had to power cycle the receiver for the pro to detect that it was hdcp 2.2 compliant and that it supports 4k. Aside from that one time, it's working great.
LG B6 OLED
Pioneer VSX-1130-K
Works fine w/ 4k + hdr w/ the ps4 pro.
One time I had to power cycle the receiver for the pro to detect that it was hdcp 2.2 compliant and that it supports 4k. Aside from that one time, it's working great.
What about using an HDMI splitter?
Yep, no issues.That's good to hear. I have similar setup but with a E6 and no Samsung player. I'm looking into the S720W or X1300W. HDCP issues are annoying as well so if all of that works, then sounds good. Does the XBS work with this Avr playing Uhd blurays?