BMO = GOAT
Member
I doubt Sarah Palin or Condoleezza Rice would be a problem.
I should have been more specific , how will they feel about Hilary?
I doubt Sarah Palin or Condoleezza Rice would be a problem.
It's interesting how any of the standard duties the president performs weren't an issue until Obama took office.
Is that good?
Is that good?
And it doesn't matter, because it's red meat to their base: Old, white and angry. The message they are sending is clear. Obama's executive actions have stopped deportation of kids brought here illegally, tried to remove anti-gay discrimination, curbed gun control and most recently revised EPA guidelines on coal. This action is a big giant fuck you to all those groups and people that support them (non-old, white and angry). The good 'ol america they keep talking about is where gays and Latinos don't exist and blacks knew their place.That's the point. This is GOP leadership attempting to placate the far right with half measures and other bullshit they can parade as "accomplishments." They have lost nearly every time they've challenged him since the 2011 debt deal disaster (where Obama caved), and now they want a scalp.
There are republicans who want to start impeachment hearings, yet this lawsuit shit is what they'll get...and it'll go nowhere or be thrown out in court.
Haven't you heard? He's an evil mastermind while also being an incompetent buffoon.Wait, Obama is accomplishing too much? I thought the narrative was he that wasn't getting anything done.
I wonder how much more time and taxpayer money is this going to waste... on second thought, I probably don't want to know.
Wasn't there an article earlier this week how the house has enough votes for impeachment. If the republicans take the senate next autumn, it's going to be so entertaining for us political junkies outside of USA.
I wonder how they feel about a woman as president, would it be less or more hatred compared to Obama?
Wait, Obama is accomplishing too much? I thought the narrative was he that wasn't getting anything done.
Wasn't there an article earlier this week how the house has enough votes for impeachment. If the republicans take the senate next autumn, it's going to be so entertaining for us political junkies outside of USA.
Executive Orders by President
As of Jan. 20, 2014:
FDR - 3,522
Truman - 907
Eisenhower - 484
JFK - 214
LBJ - 325
Nixon - 346
Ford - 169
Carter - 320
Reagan - 381
Bush (41) - 166
Clinton - 364
Bush (43) - 291
Obama - 168
I'm just wondering what the hell they would impeach him on. Using his presidential powers, and less than most presidents? Or BENGHAZI BENGHAZI?
Also, the amount of terror that strikes me when I think about anyone from that party being elected to lead the country again is huge.
I should have been more specific , how will they feel about Hilary?
They wont , because it they impeach to please the radicals then they can kiss the presidency for the next 8 years good bye
Wasn't there an article earlier this week how the house has enough votes for impeachment. If the republicans take the senate next autumn, it's going to be so entertaining for us political junkies outside of USA.
So republicans lost the presidential election when they went after Clinton?
They don't need the votes in senate, it's all about appearances. If republicans take the senate next autumn, they will bombard Obama with bills he will have no choice but to veto. They can then frame him as an obstructionist, try to impeach and then complain how democrats try to protect their political interests.
So republicans lost the presidential election when they went after Clinton?
They don't need the votes in senate, it's all about appearances. If republicans take the senate next autumn, they will bombard Obama with bills he will have no choice but to veto. They can then frame him as an obstructionist, try to impeach and then complain how democrats try to protect their political interests.
The GOP is going to completely run out of energy and motivation to do shit like this once another Dem takes the White House in 2016, right?
Sadly, no. They've got the game figured out and they've mastered it to a T.
Between Faux, Limbaugh and the rest of the AM dial, they've got a way to get their message out to their base in a way that Democrats don't really have, and they know how to use it.
I wonder how they feel about a woman as president, would it be less or more hatred compared to Obama?
The bills that republicans want passed have nothing to do with helping the middle class. They are usually bills for taking away abortion rights, gay rights, voter rights, etc. So no they can't just say he's an obstructionist and win.
The last time they tried to impeach Clinton, it ruined there chance for taking the white house. If they go through with it, they can kiss 2016 good bye.
The public does not generally know or care what the bills contain, same applies to European voters. If you appear as the villain, you will lose. And the current opposition is very adept at mud slinging.
They are looking good in the polls right now despite the shutdown and other shenanigans.
I lost it at "SuperAllah"I know exactly what evidence they're going to present!
Dude people are not that dumb. You don't know much about American politics but republicans are not polling well at all. Republicans in congress are hugely unpopular to the general american public. http://www.pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm
It's not about being dumb, it's more about not having the time to study the political field. Why else would the conservatives have the edge on foreign policy again?
The race for senate is dead even at this point, democrats are probably going to lose and it's just a question by how much.
Wasn't there an article earlier this week how the house has enough votes for impeachment. If the republicans take the senate next autumn, it's going to be so entertaining for us political junkies outside of USA.