nVidiot_Whore
Banned
What's the #1 cause of pedophilia?
Please don't ban me! It's just a silly,
joke.
Sexy kids.
Please don't ban me! It's just a silly,
sexy
This is why I rub dirt and horse manure on my kid before we go outside. I don't want to risk it.nVidiot_Whore said:What's the #1 cause of pedophilia?
Sexy kids.
Please don't ban me! It's just a silly,joke.sexy
a/s/l?macuser1of5 said:This is why I rub dirt and horse manure on my kid before we go outside. I don't want to risk it.
Am I bad parent for laughing?MetalAlien said:a/s/l?
I've already started buying my 3 month old daughter some future outfits.macuser1of5 said:This is why I rub dirt and horse manure on my kid before we go outside. I don't want to risk it.
Hellion said:
Nix said:Kim Kardashian was not fourteen in that photo! I won't believe that, because if I do, I'll have some very, very conflicted feelings, and that...would make me sad.
Though, I think she's one of the except...oh. Forget what I just said, just forget it. I'm going to go under that rock over there. Damn.
Sennorin said:A positive example would be a pedophile who admits his attraction, acknowledges that it is wrong act on it within our society and therefore keeps it all to his fantasy.
BatmanBatmanBatman said:Had to google him and the show, but he just doesn't look like that kind of guy.
EatChildren said:I've lost count of the amount of people I've spoken to who have said that there is a frighteningly significant pedophilic precense in the Australian film industry.
okdakor said:Yeah, that's like the guy who fantasize about burning kittens... No problem, as long as he doesn't do it in real life.
Or the one who's having a boner everyday when he sees old people and thinks about beating their face to a pulp. Totaly nice guy.
You really think that archiving tons of pictures of underage actresses is ok ? That these guys are keeping the pics (including gifs looping on poses that make them luscious) until the girls are 18 ?
If these good pedos know that they're wrong, and that they won't be able to satisfy their urges, ever, and are as reasonable persons as you seem to think... why don't they ask for a chemical castration ?
"Because they're still human people, who have the right to masturbate to pictures of your daughter as long as they don't try it in real life" is not a good answer.
Sennorin said:And it is also perfectly okay for such people to masturbate to their fantasies, why take away any sexual sensation from them? Because you say so?
Sennorin said:Also, pictures of underage actresses make you a pedophile now? I´d guess that a lot of Gaffers would like to have a word with you about that.
Biggest problem on GAF too
There's nothing ironic about it. All you've done here is to erroneously suggest that in invalid invocation of the slippery slope was valid when it wasn't.Mael said:Funny that the argument used against acceptance of homosexual behaviour was that it would lead to acceptance of other sick deviance and all that...
And well people really do try that angle to say the least.
Hey what can I say, I like ironing
I don't say it's valid or anything, I'm saying it's funny that people made crazy predictions that actually do happen for all the wrong reasons.Steve Youngblood said:There's nothing ironic about it. All you've done here is to erroneously suggest that in invalid invocation of the slippery slope was valid when it wasn't.
okdakor said:Yeah, that's like the guy who fantasize about burning kittens... No problem, as long as he doesn't do it in real life.
Or the one who's having a boner everyday when he sees old people and thinks about beating their face to a pulp. Totaly nice guy.
You really think that archiving tons of pictures of underage actresses is ok ? That these guys are keeping the pics (including gifs looping on poses that make them luscious) until the girls are 18 ?
If these good pedos know that they're wrong, and that they won't be able to satisfy their urges, ever, and are as reasonable persons as you seem to think... why don't they ask for a chemical castration ?
"Because they're still human people, who have the right to masturbate to pictures of your daughter as long as they don't try it in real life" is not a good answer.
Well if they're reasonable and they can only do illegal acts in satisfying their urges why would they try to hang on the root cause of their frustration?ArjanN said:Seriously? It's one thing to admit to yourself you have a desire that's not cool to act upon, it's something else to come out and ask to be castrated.
It's not castration nor does it sterilize a person. It's just a medication you take that makes you not want to have sex with children.ArjanN said:Seriously? It's one thing to admit to yourself you have a desire that's not cool to act upon, it's something else to come out and ask to be castrated.
Sennorin said:One of the worse posts in this thread. Do you hate innocent people so much as to compare them to psychopaths and murderers? It´s this disgusting attitude that makes me defend pedophiles. They´re such an easy target because of how society has painted them as these ominous, super dangerous monsters that will destroy your children. Such bullshit! I´d almost bet that everyone of us knows someone that is a pedophile, but that person simply never showed it. Why? See the above posting. "Monster! Beast! Burn it alive!" Why is it so hard to accept that those poor souls exist that never chose what they´re attracted to and, knowing themselves that it is wrong, never acted on their urges? I cannot stress enough how sickening these accusations of "all pedophiles are criminals" are, because that´s really exactly the same as saying "Sennorin, you´re a rapist. Why? Because you´re 25, you never had sex and a normal person cannot live without sex. Thus, you are a criminal. I have no evidence for it, but according to what I believe, it has to be the case". Seriously?
And yes, you´re prude if you think it´s wrong to find certain teenage girls hot. There are enough hot young girls and as long as it´s legal, you can even approach them. It´s only bs-morals that could keep you from it. A politician in Germany had to quit his career today because he was in love with a 16-year old girl. That is legal here, but shitty conservatives in his party demanded his end. God, I hate such stuck up bourgeois that cannot accept other people´s happiness. </rant>
Utako said:More anecdotal proof that pedophilia is an actual sexual orientation.
Trokil said:Reminds me of a family guy episode
Dr. Diddy: Let me explain something to you, all right? We got to get her half-naked and put her up front center stage. That's gonna make you all billionaires, because America loves hot white jailbait ass.
Peter Griffin: Wait a minute... that's the smartest thing I've ever heard anyone say about anything.
Maybe Seth MacFarlane was right. Ok I know Family Guy but still.
okdakor said:Because it's sick ?
You're really saying that it's ok to masturbate to a picture of a 8 year old kid, as long as nobody knows it ?
Well if they're reasonable and they can only do illegal acts in satisfying their urges why would they try to hang on the root cause of their frustration?
Sennorin said:They can *gasp* masturbate to satisfy their urges. You know, masturbation is fun, too. It´s what I do instead of raping women, as member of virgin-gaf.
No, and I wouldn't want to hang out with people who do. Likewise for people who masturbate to pictures of eight-year-old girls.Sennorin said:Never fantasized about beating some asshole, or even killing someone?
Sennorin said:You know, masturbation is fun, too. It´s what I do instead of raping women, as member of virgin-gaf.
Sennorin said:They can *gasp* masturbate to satisfy their urges. You know, masturbation is fun, too. It´s what I do instead of raping women, as member of virgin-gaf.
macuser1of5 said:Are you saying you want to rape women, but don't, and masturbate instead?
But there's a huge difference here, you've got a lot of ways to relieve the urges from dating women to paying prostitutes which are not exactly illegal everywhere either.Sennorin said:wat?! No, I´m saying that just because I haven´t had sex yet, I´m not committing crimes because of that. Just like a pedophile doesn´t fuck children, only because of his attraction.
Rape fantasies are quite common from what I hear.macuser1of5 said:Are you saying you want to rape women, but don't, and masturbate instead?
Dr. Kitty Muffins said:I wonder just how much Hollywood would actually change if all the molesters were put in prison.
Spokker said:Here's what I'm getting from this.
Someone wants to fuck children or rape women. Instead of doing that, they masturbate and that satisfies their urges to fuck children or rape women. Problem solved.
Is this correct?
Again, though, are you talking about a role-playing scenario? As in I go home and tell my wife "tonight, I want you to resist as I take you by force." Because if you are, this is a fringe example of something that isn't really at all applicable to the point you're alluding to. I.e. the question "Is it wrong to fantasize about illegal activities? Let me direct your attention to those who play out rape fantasies." That doesn't really work, in my humble opinion. By asking my wife to play along, it's not rape at that point. Unless you're just really into character acting and can put yourself into the mind of a rapist while carrying out the act, I don't understand how a pretend scenario carried out with a willing partner might cause concern that there's a rapist within you that really wants to come out.tiff said:Rape fantasies are quite common from what I hear.
PairOfFilthySocks said:I actually find this rather relevant since I recently heard from a friend of mine in another city about a dude who was, uh, "pleasuring" himself in bushes beside a playground. What do you folks think of that?
Well, I'd assume that said individual would have the following happen:PairOfFilthySocks said:I actually find this rather relevant since I recently heard from a friend of mine in another city about a dude who was, uh, "pleasuring" himself in bushes beside a playground. What do you folks think of that?
charsace said:Blake Lively has been Harvey Weinstein's bitch for example.
how do you know all this about Weinstein? someone aired him out?charsace said:I doubt it. Gretchen Mol could not get huge roles because of Weinstein. A young actor turning down someone with power could have a really hard time breaking out if that person decides to blacklist them.
This reminds me of the major backlash here when Kara Dioguardi admitted she was raped by a well known music producer but refused to name him. How is it cowardly? On top of making Feldman's life hell he can get sued to hell and back for defamation if he openly names the child molesters. Don't get me wrong, this is extremely fucked up that this environment exists but I feel like the world's obsession with celebrities and derelict parents are complicit.Snowman Prophet of Doom said:That's why I said that it was personally rational but still cowardly. He could help a generation of kids escape this kind of mistreatment and abuse, but he chooses to think first and foremost about his own personal welfare. It's understandable, but I still think it should be condemned, if only to maybe embolden somebody else who is willing to name names and situations to come forward.
would not surprise me. If 99% of men look at porn I doubt there's more than a handful of male pedophiles who haven't looked at child porn.Sennorin said:No. Are you seriously saying that every pedophile "at least" owns child porn? wtf
How you satisfy the fantasy isn't so much a concern to me because there are legal (or at least quasi-legal?) ways to satisfy just about any fetish or attraction to some degree without actually committing the act itself. Perhaps unless you consider role playing a fantasy with a live human being to be the only real way to adequately satisfy a fantasy? I'm not sure.Steve Youngblood said:Again, though, are you talking about a role-playing scenario? As in I go home and tell my wife "tonight, I want you to resist as I take you by force." Because if you are, this is a fringe example of something that isn't really at all applicable to the point you're alluding to. I.e. the question "Is it wrong to fantasize about illegal activities? Let me direct your attention to those who play out rape fantasies." That doesn't really work, in my humble opinion. By asking my wife to play along, it's not rape at that point. Unless you're just really into character acting and can put yourself into the mind of a rapist while carrying out the act, I don't understand how a pretend scenario carried out with a willing partner might cause concern that there's a rapist within you that really wants to come out.
Mind you, I'm not a psychologist. I don't know what the desire to play out a rape fantasy with one's consensual partner tells us about the individual. However, I'm not convinced that it means you might really have the potential to be a rapist, or even want to be a rapist for that matter.
Public indecency?PairOfFilthySocks said:I actually find this rather relevant since I recently heard from a friend of mine in another city about a dude who was, uh, "pleasuring" himself in bushes beside a playground. What do you folks think of that?
I highly doubt the actual figure is anywhere near 99%.YoungHav said:would not surprise me. If 99% of men look at porn I doubt there's more than a handful of male pedophiles who haven't looked at child porn.
I just assumed you were talking about that. Otherwise, my opinion would largely be the same as it is in regard to people who have thoughts of molesting children. I would be very concerned if I had the following exchange:tiff said:How you satisfy the fantasy isn't so much a concern to me because there are legal (or at least quasi-legal?) ways to satisfy just about any fetish or attraction to some degree without actually committing the act itself. Perhaps unless you consider role playing a fantasy with a live human being to be the only real way to adequately satisfy a fantasy? I'm not sure.
Spire said:So he knows of adults actively molesting children but won't give their names? Classy. I guess milking it for attention without burning any bridges is better for him.
PairOfFilthySocks said:If you are referring to me, be aware that:
A) This was in Dublin, far-and-away the biggest city in Ireland, and
B) The moment the perp was spotted, he hopped on his motorbike and sped off before they could catch it's license plate.
Trust me, if my buddy got him before he escaped, he'd get fucked up good and proper.
True. I think what'd be more accurate would be 99% of males who have a personal computer hooked up to the internet look at teh p0rnz.tiff said:I highly doubt the actual figure is anywhere near 99%.
What weirds me out about something like that is that it's about a real person, I guess. I'm fairly sure I've never looked at someone and said to myself "Oh man, I want them to bend me over and destroy my ass while I beg them to stop."Steve Youngblood said:I just assumed you were talking about that. Otherwise, my opinion would largely be the same as it is in regard to people who have thoughts of molesting children. I would be very concerned if I had the following exchange:
Person: "There was this person I saw last night that I really wanted to rape."
Me: "Wait, you just meant 'have sex with', right?"
Person: "No. I wanted to force myself upon her against her will and have my way with her. It has to be against her will."
I wouldn't just scoff at that and go "cool beans as long as you know not to act on it." I would be a little alarmed.
So, what were you alluding to then when you threw out how it's more common than one might think for people to have rape fantasies? You admit that you weren't referring specifically to something like my role-playing example, my "I fantasized about raping that person" apparently weirded you out like it would have me. So, what food for thought was supposed to be gleamed from that. What were you talking about?tiff said:I dunno, I think there's a line between harmless fantasy and legitimately being a danger to yourself or others, and something like that is pretty close to it. But maybe it's just because you'd be hard pressed to find someone actually willing to admit something like that.