There's a point where being muscular stops looking good.
Yeah, to you. I can respect that.
To make this about women again, it's interesting to look at the (general) motives driving these two extremes in their respective genders. Societal pressure and the forced image of beauty perpetuated by the media, combined with possible neurological problems, can lead to anorexia, which is considered a disease. It is said that certain features of a women like a healthy body fat percentage and bosom size are generally considered attractive to men based on natural imperatives. I personally can attest to these tenets; my tastes are in line with these parameters.
Now to bring this back to the overarching topic at large, I can absolutely see how "more muscular than Hemmsworth" can be too much for some, if not most women. That's a lot of man and a clear outlier in the spectrum of male bodytypes in America. Nevermind the stigma, whether deserved or not, placed upon those with bodytypes considered "more muscular than Hemmsworth". The bodybuilders mentioned in this thread are elite level men, however. I would wager that you couldn't come up with a living skinny girl that can function normally that will sit on the opposite range of Coleman or any muscle mag cover guy in the scale of human body types. So we're kind of sweetspotting the definition.
That's what Alienshogun is trying to say. He probably (rightfully) bristled at the general disdiain showed towards BBs in this thread, and lack of knowledge. Most body builders look like regular dudes, just a little more cut here, or a little more stronger, or a touch more shapely. We're not veins and gristle as popularized by Coleman and tagged on BB at large. That's why he and/or others named dorpped Hemmsworth and Brad Pitt in FC. That was the example of a "normalized" BB bodytype. And those a fan favorite bodies it looks like!