Hit and the Blade Runner world
I wish the whole episode was about Hit and this cool city/setting. Would make for a badass DB movie.
Hit and the Blade Runner world
Trunks in DQ now, lol...
This art is shit, if the artist isn't going to even try, go animate for something else
.
Wtf has 17 been up to?
Tate is an incredibly highly regarded animator and one of Toei's top talents. He has a specific style and whenever he supervises an episode he usually does most of the animation for his part of the episode himself and is also constantly working on episodes that aren't his. If Super lost Tate it'd be a lot worse off.
He has a specific style, just because it doesn't perfectly adhere to the character designs doesn't mean it's shit, it means the animator is putting their own identity into their work.
Please don'tI hope they do something really weird for this arc. Like fuse 17 and 18 with potara.
So when is Heroes gonna get around to making God Cell or Golden Cell?
Or Golden God Cell.
Isn't actually Cell, it's the god class for the bio android avatar.
Trunks in DQ now, lol...
The episode was alright, but now that we know this won't lead to a new arc or anything major I'm kind of indifferent about it. I wish the new arc would start sooner.
But the episode gave some information like what Hit can now do, Goku is the team captain and Beerus whats Whis to train Goku extra hard, and about a year past since the U6 tournament.
Isn't actually Cell, it's the god class for the bio android avatar.
Its not a case of taste nor style is horribly drawn and flat.Is this a sincere post? If so, can you articulate what about it is "shit" other than the fact that it might not be in your taste?
Its not a case of taste nor style is horribly drawn and flat.
Perfect excuse to have Goku on par with Vegeta again.
Here is a comparison of similar view angles.
Hit in a "Style"
Hit actually looking like Hit
I don't think a year past since the Future Trunks Saga. Only that a year past since the Champa Saga and now. And giving Goku's feats against Merged Zamasu, I don't think Vegeta was stronger than Goku.
And he should because it looks bad. Look how flat and ugly it is. And that is why a majority complain about it, it doesnt fit.It's
A
Different
Style
What part of Tate does his own thing don't you get?
I like the premise of gettinggoku killed then the preview throw it away instantly
But it doesn't make sense, the Future Trunks saga and the Champa one are really close in timeframe. I remember Krillin telling Goku that Vegeta went to train with Whis a little while ago in episode 47.
Also Vegeta after his training beat to the ground the same Black that almost killed Goku in episode 61. He was stronger than Goku, he has to.
I liked the little interaction between Gohan and Piccolo this episode, too
It's
A
Different
Style
What part of Tate does his own thing don't you get? He has a specific style.
And he should because it looks bad. Look how flat and ugly it is. And that is why a majority complain about it, it doesnt fit.
Same here.
"Don't lie to me, Gohan."
Piccolo stays best Big Bro/Dad.
Really digging the character stuff these past several episodes.
That's not going to mean anything to people who don't like it. It comes off as being bad art to me too. Knowing he's "doing his own thing" doesn't make me appreciate it more. In some ways it just makes it more obnoxious. If you like it, it's fine. I'm not trying to diss anyone for liking it.
There is a difference between 'bad art' and you simply not liking the art style. For example, people don't the art style of One Piece, yet it wouldn't be called bad art. The same with One Piece movie 6 where the word 'bad art' was used, where the movie is beautifully animated.
It's my opinion that it's bad art.
Tate's style definitely lends itself worse to Dragon Ball than it does One Piece, though.
A time period was never giving for when the Future Trunks Saga compared to the Champa Saga, unless you used the manga which looks like one happened after the other. And all that line tells is that Goku and Vegeta still trains under Whis. We had several episodes before 47 where Vegeta wasn't with Whis.
Giving that Goku by himself melted half of Merged Zamasu face without using the Kaioken whereas Vegeta and Trunks together didn't even burn his skin, I have doubts about Vegeta being stronger than Goku. Even the baseball game last episode had Goku pushed back Vegeta's pitch, which Vegeta admitted that he put everything into. Before then, Goku was doing just as well as Vegeta against Black's clone army, despite the clones landing hits on Vegeta.
Bad art is not an opinion. It is something you can technically see and breakdown. Bad art is me drawing people or having a five years paint.
You saying you don't like something doesn't automatically make something bad art. It just means you don't like it.
Giving that Goku by himself melted half of Merged Zamasu face without using the Kaioken whereas Vegeta and Trunks together didn't even burn his skin, I have doubts about Vegeta being stronger than Goku.
Bad art is not an opinion. It is something you can technically see and breakdown. Bad art is me drawing people or having a five years paint.
You saying you don't like something doesn't automatically make something bad art. It just means you don't like it.
One Piece fans will disagree with you. I have seen more hate towards Tate on One Piece boards than I do for Dragon Ball stuff outside of people who will forever hold Episode 5 over his head.
Exactly, Vegeta wasn't training with Whis before episode 47, so Krillin line confirms the time frame between episodes 46 and 47 is small since Vegeta never returned to train in episodes 42-46. Episode 43 also confirms it hasn't been that long since the tournament.
Goku being on par with Vegeta is a plot hole then, Goku got stronger out of thin air.
Yes it is an opinion, It's art. It's a style. I'm not saying it's not. THOSE aren't opinions. To me, it's bad art. Would you be saying the same thing if I said it was "good art"? What you're saying makes no sense.
we have tate to thank for literally one of the greatest moments in animated one piece history, if not the greatest
haters can fuck off
he hasn't yet had that moment in dragon ball, though, so I understand why people don't like his style for super
No, it is an opinion, as anyone who went to art school will tell you. Bad art means that the art itself if technically wrong. Art is a science, despite what the media tries to tell you.
You not liking an art style doesn't make it bad art.
Well, the focus of the conversation here largely seems to be (ridiculously) calling into question Tate's competence as an animator, which can be objectively evaluated. But nobody who is disparaging his work is putting forth an convincing argument to support their claims, and, as usual, it's just complaints about his stylistic choices. Saying you don't like his style is fine, saying he should be off the show or that he should try harder is silly.