Originally Posted by Skate-Zilla@www.forzacentral.com
a. why would one screen shot have AntiALiasing and another not?,
b. why would one screen shot have anti-strophic filting and ther others not?
c. why would the cars have 2 different reflections on them?,
d. why would some parts of the car be relfective and parts like headlights not?
e. why would that G35 Screen have them on a Track that isnt even in the game (dont even say its Alpine Ring, look at the map, its prolly some track off of Battle Gear.
f. why would the cars be hi-res and clear and the track in the backgroudn look like it was originally a 640x480 screen scaled to 2560x1440 noise filtered and sharpened extremely then downsized back to 1280x720.
g. the rims on the shots wre radial blured in photoshop... and disgustingly i might add... the decals on some spots are blurred and not on others....
h. the Ghosting on the Beemer/Ferrari Shot.... common sense.. to get motion blur/ghosting the camera would be stationaly with cars zooming by, but that would only make the cars have the ghosting... the ghosting on these shots were done by ghosting the ENTIRE image in photoshop, why... because not only the cars are ghosting, but aspects of the track and rumble strip as well, to have the track ghosting the camera would have to be moving, and in which case the cars wouldnt have been ghosting, and dont try to say its "de-interlacing" ... the game runs 720p "P" meaning Progressive..
i. the G35 Shots Over lays are totally fake and arcade... they are perfectly on the Overscan Guidelines (no dev puts their overlays poerfectly on them most put them inside a bout 10%, and in 2K's Case outside by 10%..., and wtf is up with the standings/positions "+128"? what in tarnation is that, why go from MM:SS:Te,H,Th (M=minutes, S=seconds, Th=tenths, H = hundreds, Th=thousands) and move to something that says +128, +21-49? wtf......
j. why would there be a gamertag "Turn10" on that Gamertag List, if the Gamertag Doesnt Exist on Xbox.coms GT Data Base by searching for Gamertag?
k. the G35s Redline is 7500 not 6500, and the Tach would go up to 8000
then the obvious one... NO 3d Grass..... and the Photoshop trail that goes around every car (sorry .. im not saying how i know, but lets just say there is evidence that the cars were copy and pasted from elsewhere..)
the 3d Models used in the CGI are the Game models, so you honestly think the difference between a 3d Studio Max Rendered scene and their next gen Game engine will make the car models look that disgusting?
lets just say these are Fake, and prolly stolen renders that were cut/pasted from other screenshots.. on to drastically different and disgusting low-ress backgrounds...
FLUXCapacitor said:Heres a post by someone from a different forum...
Kangu said:Just one thing. Don't you think che would have set the record straight by now?
IT'S AS FUNNY AS MY GRANDMA'S ASSAngelcurio said:
Agent Icebeezy said:That's true, but given that he is a longtime member of GAF, and he knows how these things work, he could be holding off to let people run with this for a minute, for comic relief. You never know.
Kangu said:It's seems rather immature for a developer to do this, and most of the developers on GAF are extremely level headed. Not to mention the importance of first impressions and the fact that setting the record straight on FUD (?) like this is hard to do.
But as you say che is a longtime poster here so he might be having some fun at the expense of the community.
Yup. I think his "we cannot confirm or deny" line is a dead giveaway that they are legit. If someone photoshopped unmitigated bullshit and people reacted like this, the community guys would comment.Kangu said:Just one thing. Don't you think che would have set the record straight by now?
Klocker said:sometimes it's best just not to say anything when people are over-reacting to something that may or may not be true, let things settle down while they actually figure out what happened.
Maybe they/he doesn't know for sure or can't say.
There are any number of reasons to not deny.
Kangu said:It's seems rather immature for a developer to do this, and most of the developers on GAF are extremely level headed. Not to mention the importance of first impressions and the fact that setting the record straight on FUD (?) like this is hard to do.
But as you say che is a longtime poster here so he might be having some fun at the expense of the community.
Kangu said:Listen, there is NO WAY that the forza guys can't tell if that's a screenshot of the game they've been developing for the past god knows how long. If it isn't then the only sane thing to do is nip it in the bud. For che to just sit there and laugh it up while GAF goes apeshit is frankly stupid and damaging to his game.
Klocker said:I'm saying, not telling GAF (read: the world) that "yea these are probably our game but it was PS'ed or really early work never meant for public consumption" could be worse from a company POV.
sometimes it's better to say NOTHING and then show your real hand.
I don't get it.drohne said:yes. but i tend to drive around wearing the one ring.
Ever see the Lord of the Rings movies? When Frodo puts the Ring on?ralexand said:I don't get it.
Angelcurio said:
Yep, sorry.Blimblim said:Urg, the jpg compression in these shots is even worse than the other ones :/
To be fair we should compare PGR3's nurburgring to Forza's.Max@GC said:
120fps!neptunes said:still 60FPS right?
Joseph Merrick said:dull screens and puke for the jpeg compression. when are we getting sweet vids?