Xbox One is the new PS2... Weaker console, but better games.
Also, this is one game. One Cross-gen game by one developer on an engine that could use some work. DICE has BF4 running at 900p on Xbox One, and the game itself looks FAR better than CoD has.
This comparison will get much more interesting as we leave last gen behind, but I don't think we can come out and just straight up rip Penello yet when this could have more to do with the developer than we know.
I wouldn't say no weight, but not as concrete as a primary source. I've seen plenty of reputable "insiders" who broke a story that ended up not being the case, and not just in gaming.
Xbox One is the new PS2... Weaker console, but better games.
This guy went so far as to ask for an apology.
100%+ difference is crazy really.... hopefully they can fix whatever problems they are having... at the same time, Sony tools will also improve and devs will start using GPU more.
So maybe future games will be more custom tailored to next gen and difference might be even more obvious at that point in time.
Xbox One is the new PS2... Weaker console, but better games.
Wtf?
Thats a joke account right?
Xbox One is the new PS2... Weaker console, but better games.
holy shit if the WiiU version is 60fps @ 720p
Oh man there are a good amount of people on r/XboxOne who actually think the PS4 isn't more powerful or that the Xbox One is more powerful than the PS4. I feel bad for anyone that still believe this.
I'll be getting both consoles within the first 6ish months of launch, but I'll be getting the Xbox One first because the launch games appeal to me more. With that said I have accepted that the Xbox One won't be as powerful and multiplatform games will most likely look worse on the it for the rest of the generation
Xbox One is the new PS2... Weaker console, but better games.
X stands for XTREEEEEME.I really wonder what MS did to earn this kind of loyalty. I don't get it.
Read this one on the Xbox One IGN forums. LMAO
GAFGaf
Animated
Format
We must trademark it
*places an arm around Deadly Cyclone's shoulders*Also, this is one game. One Cross-gen game by one developer on an engine that could use some work. DICE has BF4 running at 900p on Xbox One, and the game itself looks FAR better than CoD has.
Either the COD engine is shit, or IW really dropped the ball here.
Partially Microsofts fault as well. Should have just bit the bullet and gone with a better GPU.
Again: From Albert.
This guy went so far as to ask for an apology.
GAF
Animated
Format
is a recursive acronym.
This needs to be a thing
Xbox One is the new PS2... Weaker console, but better games.
Partially Microsofts fault as well. Should have just bit the bullet and gone with a better GPU.
Xbox One is the new PS2... Weaker console, but better games.
Just read this on ign. Pure gold.
I don't think people get it.
The upscaled resolution actually results in a better looking game. They can save resources by using a lower native resolution, then use the hardware HANA2 upscaler to push a higher quality, full 1080p image to your TV screen.
End result, better looking image, less resources wasted on native resolution (instead used for higher quality textures, lighting, etc).
This is a GOOD thing. This is demonstrating Xbox One's impressive upscaling and resource optimization abilities. Now developers can cram more content, visuals, etc into their games thanks to the saved resources due to the superior upscaler, and still end up with a better looking game than if they went with native 1080p.
People gave mortimer death threats?? That's really pathetic... At the end of the day gaming is a hobby, and doing shit like that over a person on the internet passing along a rumor (which turned out to be true) is completely uncalled for. I'll never understand how nasty and jaded people can be in the gaming community, it's one of the things that's kind of surprised me since i started reading stuff on gaming websites and forums.
That being said, there is a definite Sony bias on Gaf. Not that I have an issue with it, I've really enjoyed the last two sony consoles I've owned (PS3, PS2) and I think outside of the initial issues with the PS3 they've done a fantastic job in terms of business decisions and pleasing their customers. However, the fact is the only real evidence we had about this rumor until Infinity Ward confirmed it was essentially a couple neogaf forum posts. It's fun to speculate but people were a bit too eager to act like this was fact way before we had any official statement or even anything substantial come out (like footage) that would support the validity of the rumor. Which reading the posts from those people felt more like they had an agenda against the Xbox One (probably hoping it would fail as a result of some form of karmic retribution for trying to implement some unfavorable policies) then objectively reacting to the rumor.
Just read this on ign. Pure gold.
I don't think people get it.
The upscaled resolution actually results in a better looking game. They can save resources by using a lower native resolution, then use the hardware HANA2 upscaler to push a higher quality, full 1080p image to your TV screen.
End result, better looking image, less resources wasted on native resolution (instead used for higher quality textures, lighting, etc).
This is a GOOD thing. This is demonstrating Xbox One's impressive upscaling and resource optimization abilities. Now developers can cram more content, visuals, etc into their games thanks to the saved resources due to the superior upscaler, and still end up with a better looking game than if they went with native 1080p.
Xbox One is the new PS2... Weaker console, but better games.
To be ABSOLUTELY FAIR to Albert Penello (even though I definitely think the difference is 30%+ period), this news wouldn't necessarily suggest there was a 30%+ power advantage... because the culprit many are blaming is that the tools are still not as mature as PS4's and the added complexity of the ESRam set up is causing development time to be considerably longer. For tight launch deadlines, that would mean sacrifices. The tools are obviously going to improve, and devs are going to get used to the ESRam set up.
So, even though I am almost 100% sure the difference is 30%+, I would just wait until next Christmas to compare titles and make that final nail in the coffin, so-to-speak.
If you want choice go PC. GI would say there is no noticeable difference so buy the Xbox One version.I really wish the ps4 version was 720p and used the spare processing power for a higher framerate/better textures to see if GI would change their tune. What happens later on in the generation when multiplats (lets say bf5) is 720p on ps4, would it be 600p on xbox one??
Some people just have no idea xD
"Seriously doubt the X1 version will be worst than the P$4. The upscale on the X1 is so good, that games like CoD will look even better at 720p than 1080p."
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-10-30-call-of-duty-ghosts-720p-on-xbox-one-1080p-on-ps4
Read this one on the Xbox One IGN forums. LMAO
That is some Fox News "You can't explain that!" level of BS!
Xbox One is the new PS2... Weaker console, but better launch games.
Xbox One is the new PS2... Weaker console, but better games.
*places an arm around Deadly Cyclone's shoulders*
My friend, I don't know how to tell you this...but there's something that you should know.
*places an arm around Deadly Cyclone's shoulders*
My friend, I don't know how to tell you this...but there's something that you should know.