ULTROS!
People seem to like me because I am polite and I am rarely late. I like to eat ice cream and I really enjoy a nice pair of slacks.
This.
Wasn't FFXIII or FFXIII-2 the result of a focus group?
This.
I mentioned this in another thread, I was in one of those focus groups in Austin. Not sure how much I'm allowed to talk about now as there was an NDA (though everything we saw and way more has been public for a long time), but this definitely was the problem. I seemed to be the only one who was like "Cool, it could be like playing a really good game for The Incredibles or something". Almost everyone else reacted just like this article says. And I couldn't help but overhear everyone else also arranging times to play CoD and/or Battlefield with each other, no joke.
EDIT: actually read through the thread now, my group saw the E3 trailer and some REALLY early gameplay, it wasn't the apparently even more "kiddy" pre-Overstrike he's talking about.
Wasn't FFXIII or FFXIII-2 the result of a focus group?
Again. Please re-read my comments in the OP. this refers to the ORIGINAL pitch -> Overstrike.
It does not refer to Overstrike -> Fuse
lol that's what I'm thinkingIm curious if the original pitch was even better than Overstrike now lol.
I was in a gaming focus group before.
It was an action-platformer. Every single person except me had the following input for the game, "It would be better if it was a shooter".
Ugh...I was in a gaming focus group before.
It was an action-platformer. Every single person except me had the following input for the game, "It would be better if it was a shooter".
They appeal to more of the mass market who usually just want more of what they are familiar with. First impressions are a big deal.Fucking focus groups ruin EVERYTHING!
olderlands (shitty quality)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jghY8i9knyU
It could be better if the focus groups were diverse, like people coming from different countries who played different games (like someone from Korea, Japan, SEA, South America, EU, and NA).
Why would Insomniac have any confidence this will perform better than Inversion, Binary Domain, or Army of Two?
Yeah, to reflect about the circumstance that he had to endure and to set the mood for the game. Carefree fucking douche would ruin the mood of the game, and show that Cole has never had a miserable day in his life. The reality of the situation should be reflected on character design.So instead of a carefree fucking douche, you'd prefer your douches to be straight-up with just a hint of Mein Kampf?
I don't know if the gentler Cole was the best route they could have gone in, but the answer wasn't to take the old design and give him a scar.
No.Final Infamous 2 Cole says otherwise.
Is having any modicum of self-respect something they don't allow for participants of focus groups?
Stuff like this makes me convinced at least SOME suggestions should be thrown out without thinking twice. Not every damn game needs to be a shooter, given how absolutely STUFFED the industry is with them it's simply not worth pursuing when 90% of them would just keep on playing CoD/Battlefield and maybe Gears/Halo.I was in a gaming focus group before.
It was an action-platformer. Every single person except me had the following input for the game, "It would be better if it was a shooter".
I like ugly Cole. >_>Final Infamous 2 Cole says otherwise.
Focus group? Do they mean Fuck us Group because that's what they did.
codecow said:I'm always happy to bring in people who buy games to have them play. I remember watching a Dead Space test where one guy got pissed and put his controller down. He then looked around like, "Can I leave now?". I was thinking, "Dayooommmmm."
Anyway if you keep testing your game and the testers keep giving the same feedback you ignore at your own peril.
Fuck focus groups.
Unless I'm in it. Cause I like me
No, I'm sure they're very useful for games... on the mechnical level. But then I'm thinking more surprise play testing than anything else, make them play a decent chunk of the game and see what they feel is off (and if they complain about it not being a shooter disregard it unless it actually makes some sort of sense). I imagine, say, the two archers in Dark Souls wouldn't have survived a focus group play testing if they were to remember to take everything with a grain of salt.Focus groups are absolutely useless when it comes to gaming. If Minecraft had had a focus group, it would have never been made.
There's a difference between playtesting and what Insomniac used these focus groups for.
Huh, aren't ACiT and Resistance 3 their two most liked games as of late? This may further prove that gameplay focus testing IS a very good idea when handled correctly, though this doesn't really explain All 4 One I guess.Insomniac now do extremely extensive playtesting too. User reaction to Resistance 2 probably spurred this.
Insomniac now do extremely extensive playtesting too. User reaction to Resistance 2 probably spurred this.
Details
It's a stretch, but I believe Bioshock (well, that came JUST before CoD made everything blow up) and Deus Ex did reasonably well. I'm guessing if you've got nothing but a linear campaign and typical multiplayer you're going to have a very hard time getting noticed, whereas those games can more easily get people's interest.I know a lot of people want the "Call of Duty demographic", but I was under the impression that hardcore CoD fans mostly JUST play CoD. We all complain about the influx of shooters this gen, but what other shooters have become truly huge? Borderlands is popular, but it definitely strays from your typical FPS build. TF2 and CS are in this category as well.
Yeah. Art style has little to do with how mature a game is. Going for some generic CoD'esque style won't make your game more mature, it'll make it mediocre.You know, I heard Borderlands 2 is doing pretty well...
I don't mind them adding "mature" themes, but I still think a unique art style is a cool and attractive thing.