Then what was it? As people are currently buying software for the Wii with literally no knowledge the wii u exists or what it's function was.Then you'd be wrong. Just like the people that blame "marketing".
Do you really think Nintendo had to choose between more power and another screen?
Joke post?Was an awful idea. Done poorly, it was like texting while driving.
If you want proof that second screen gaming was a terrible idea. I have one thing that needs to be mentioned : kid icarus. Drops mic
Dude that game was awful. I bought into the counter hype here. Which was the game is actually good and don't listen to the reviews. Worst controls ever.You mean the GOAT?
OP is correct, there's just too many biased posters to admit it. DS was the only good implementation, everything else was hampered by either being behind the times or poorly designed
The 3DS has had many amazing games, but I'd argue that it's identity as a handheld has had way less to do with having 2 screens than the original DS did (heck even by the end Pokemon started practically ignoring the bottom screen compared to older entries). .
No. Fire Emblem will never be the same without it.
...You seem to be misunderstanding something if you think the Switch is capable of displaying on two screens at once, though. It's not only that devs aren't doing it / players aren't asking for it; it's just not a thing to begin with, because it can't be (without additional hardware).
Get out of here. Without second screen gaming we would have never had our Fronks.
Fronk is love
Fronk is life