Imperfected
Member
Stuff like "the better game won" etc. Like polyh3dron's post. I agree that Knack is not shit, those posts are obviously immature. I don't think it was particularly good though. And 3D World was pretty objectively amazing, it's just sad to see such a good game having bad sales be celebrated. Of course it is mainly due to the disaster of a platform it was released on.
Edit: my mistake if he was trolling
You keep using that word; I do not think it means what you think it means.
Objectively, it is a Mario game. Objectively, it is on the Wii-U. Objectively, it is a platformer. There is no such thing as "objective quality" with regard to works of art. The Mona Lisa does not, objectively, have quality, and the works of Justin Bieber do not, objectively, lack quality. Those are subjective opinions. They may be very well-informed opinions, and despite the constant outcry against them there is nothing inherently wrong with subjectivity or opinions, but they are by their nature not objective.
You perhaps mean to say that it is a demonstrably better game, presuming that you are able to provide clear cases to make that argument. That would still be entirely subjective, though, as video games do not have widely agreed upon "objective" values that can be measured and demonstrated in comparison to one another, as would be the case for a compound's chemical purity or the hardness of a material.