Same rumor as ign, fake
Doesn't sound too different from a current gen PC.LOL another fucking rumor, nice job fudzilla copy and paste IGN lol
Anyways I like the part were it's on par with current gen lol I'm sure a Quad AMD 3850 and a HD 7650 is on par LMFAO
I guess they are just gonna duct tape two PS3's together.
This may or may not be quoted 100 times
Doesn't sound too different from a current gen PC.
I don't mind this at all. I mean, at all. I will line up and buy this for $299! You're right, don't want to pay $599USD+ for this specs though. Hopefully it comes with a 3.5" HDD instead of 2.5" and hopefully it's not proprietary and you can use standard HDD.
The PC card only has 8 ROPs and 64GB/sec of bandwidth, I think even a Geforce 8800 could eclipse it in many scenarios.
Count me out of PS4 if those are the specs. Sounds like an underpowered waste of time. Sony and MS need to grow some balls and get Tahiti performance with 4 GB of RAM and launch in 2014. Unless they want to completely disappoint gamers. It's cool to save money, but launch when the time is right with RIGHT specs.
TrueIf you were building a current gen PC for gaming, you wouldn't build it with such shitty hardware. Hopefully that puts it in perspective.
It won't be long before the arrival of a fully blown "consoles am doomed" meme.
This is the age of the rise of PC and the end of the era of the console.
If Sony aims for these specs, expect MS to be in the same ballpark. This would be a stop-gap generation for everyone. The real winner will be Nintendo if these specs turn out to be true.
You can't make good games without the right specs, duh.What if it has really good games? You still won't buy it?
What if it has really good games? You still won't buy it?
Even these specs would be 4X+ current gen, while Nintendo is rumored to be only on par.
These might make the road easier for Nintendo, but not even all that much imo. whether 4X or 10X, more powerful is still more powerful.
In fact at some point the degree of power superiority probably doesn't even matter that much. Unless Wii U is within ~30% of the other guys, whether they're 2X or 20X is likely almost irrelevant.
Even these specs would be 4X+ current gen, while Nintendo is rumored to be only on par.
These might make the road easier for Nintendo, but not even all that much imo. whether 4X or 10X, more powerful is still more powerful.
This is a reprint of the IGN rumour, not a new 'leak'.
Even these specs would be 4X+ current gen, while Nintendo is rumored to be only on par.
These might make the road easier for Nintendo, but not even all that much imo. whether 4X or 10X, more powerful is still more powerful.
In fact at some point the degree of power superiority probably doesn't even matter that much. Unless Wii U is within ~30% of the other guys, whether they're 2X or 20X is likely almost irrelevant.
To be fair the APU also includes another GPU (the Radeon HD 6550D to be exact) that would give the system another 8 ROPs to use.
Even these specs would be 4X+ current gen, while Nintendo is rumored to be only on par.
These might make the road easier for Nintendo, but not even all that much imo. whether 4X or 10X, more powerful is still more powerful.
In fact at some point the degree of power superiority probably doesn't even matter that much. Unless Wii U is within ~30% of the other guys, whether they're 2X or 20X is likely almost irrelevant.
I think that gpu runs modern warfare 2 about 80 fps max at 720p. This is not real people.
What's their history on rumors?
Fun note:
FUD generally means Fear, Unrest, and Doubt. So, to spread FUD, one might start whispering about how The Last Guardian has been turned in to a Vita-only game and now heavily features Monster Hunter-style local multiplayer. It's not true, but it gets people worried.
So naming your site Fudzilla and posting articles like this sure does make for an interesting coincidence.
EA, Activision, DICE, and Epic all insisted on raising the ceiling by what we would traditionally consider a generational leap.
Microsoft listened because they were told this would increase game sales and hardware adoption.
The bulk of software is from third party developers. Expect that to be across the entire spectrum of the market. The PS4 will be my "Exclusives" only system if this rumor turns out to be true. I wanted Sony to go the traditional route with powerful hardware. Is it a crime to ask for Tahiti performance, 4 gb of RAM, and a 2014 launch? This is a console that will last us 5 years at the minimum.\
Sony and MS could have went for Tahiti performance, 2014, and 4gb of RAM. Developer's happy, gamer's happy, and $299.
If Sony wants to strike first, they might go with a cheap console, the same strategy Nintendo will use with Wii U.
In general it seems that every future system is on par or below current gen.
I look forward to 2040 where consoles will be original Gameboy level.
Even these specs would be 4X+ current gen, while Nintendo is rumored to be only on par.
These might make the road easier for Nintendo, but not even all that much imo. whether 4X or 10X, more powerful is still more powerful.
In fact at some point the degree of power superiority probably doesn't even matter that much. Unless Wii U is within ~30% of the other guys, whether they're 2X or 20X is likely almost irrelevant.
You are the man people believe in. You have risen the hopes of all the plebians on GAF with one post about the Xbox 720
Fairo. As a predominantly Nintendo based gamer third party content isn't really on my radar much
Wonder what Sony will do to differentiate their console if they aren't going all out on power? MS has Kinect and Live, Nintendo has motion controls, the padlet and their exclusives. Sony has... middle of the road online, middle of the road motion/camera controls, solid but not spectacular (sales wise) exclusives. Going on the evidence of the PS3 and the Vita they don't really know how to focus their efforts into something that's anything more than a jack of all trades.
I think that gpu runs modern warfare 2 about 80 fps max at 720p. This is not real people.
The Wii was so underspecced that it was impossible to port HD games. It simply lacked the CPU/GPU horsepower and RAM. That will change in the next gen. Even if the Wii U falls behind Microsoft and Sony's new machines in 2013, if those games are functionally and visually identical to PS4/720 games with the only difference being either the framerate (30 vs 60 fps), resolution (720p vs 1080p) or a few visual effects I wonder if Joe Sixpack will be able to tell those versions apart. It's going to be the difference between running the same PC game on different visual fidelity settings. That's a check on the box.
Fun note:
FUD generally means Fear, Unrest, and Doubt.