Foliorum Viridum
Banned
Good for them. Doesn't change my standards.
CoffeeJanitor said:I've always thought that this is a dumb thing to advertise. What if those 60,000 lines suck?
Your standards of what a 360 game should look like are unreasonably high.Foliorum Viridum said:Good for them. Doesn't change my standards.
My standards are for what the PC version should look like. If past games are anything to go by, Bethesda don't put the extra bells and whistles on their games for PC like they should do.Tobor said:Your standards of what a 360 game should look like are unreasonably high.
TheExorzist said:Wow, so Skyrim has bad graphics now. Hilarious.
You gotta love those hardcore PC gamers.
360 screenshot... maybe?...DennisK4 said:Not exactly The Witcher 2 is it.
ced said:Let's bitch about mammoth hair and rock textures and completely ignore that badass fog on the mountain. I'll take details like that over high res textures.
This, it looks fine for what it is.Foliorum Viridum said:It doesn't look bad, it's perfectly acceptabe. It just doesn't look great in a post-Witcher 2 world.
Blue Ninja said:There are also new screenshots described, though I haven't seen them for myself yet. These include a battle with a Draugr, a campsite near a river, a new type of fire spell, a female human character walking towards a city, a close-up of a female (possibly Imperial) warrior, a guard in Legionnaire armor and a bearded Nord in a castle, armed with a warhammer.
Me too. Im buying it day one for PC and will love the hell out of it. And Ill love it even more when the modders make it look even better.Darklord said:I'm a PC gamer and I think skyrim looks amazing.
Salaadin said:Me too. Im buying it day one for PC and will love the hell out of it. And Ill love it even more when the modders make it look even better.
You gotta love those hardcore PC gamers with 20/20 vision..TheExorzist said:Wow, so Skyrim has bad graphics now. Hilarious.
You gotta love those hardcore PC gamers.
DennisK4 said:The only thing embarrassing here are the graphics and the apologists.
wit3tyg3r said:Damn, Dennis. Do you not read ANYTHING I tell you? So far, in every single thread related to Skyrim, you've been complaining and bitching about the graphics. And I agree that they aren't super high-quality like other PC-exclusive RPGs, but I explain everything every single time, but it's like you just don't read. Read my posts carefully. You just don't seem to understand anything about developing games.
And here, I'll help. Here is my long explanation about why Skyrim can't look like Witcher 2:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=28117060&postcount=973
wit3tyg3r said:Damn, Dennis. Do you not read ANYTHING I tell you? So far, in every single thread related to Skyrim, you've been complaining and bitching about the graphics. And I agree that they aren't super high-quality like other PC-exclusive RPGs, but I explain everything every single time, but it's like you just don't read. Read my posts carefully. You just don't seem to understand anything about developing games.
And here, I'll help. Here is my long explanation about why Skyrim can't look like Witcher 2:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=28117060&postcount=973
bengraven said:Bro, be careful. haha
TheExorzist said:Wow, so Skyrim has bad graphics now. Hilarious.
You gotta love those hardcore PC gamers.
fizzelopeguss said:He's not listening because you post a load of bethesda fanwank.
wit3tyg3r said:Damn, Dennis. Do you not read ANYTHING I tell you? So far, in every single thread related to Skyrim, you've been complaining and bitching about the graphics. And I agree that they aren't super high-quality like other PC-exclusive RPGs, but I explain everything every single time, but it's like you just don't read. Read my posts carefully. You just don't seem to understand anything about developing games.
And here, I'll help. Here is my long explanation about why Skyrim can't look like Witcher 2:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=28117060&postcount=973
Blue Ninja said:
I'm staying out of it. I'll just keep you well-fed with information, and watch from the sidelines as you devour eachother. When the dust settles, I'll go play Skyrim. :lol
WanderingWind said:TES is a series that I want functional graphics.
bengraven said:The "it's an open world, so the graphics can't be better" argument is folly, folly...
Why bother? Todays graphics don't need to be surpased anymore. A couple of developers have already stated that this is the first generation in VG-history where they aren't limited by hardware anymore to realize their ideas.voltron said:Its totally fair enough for PC gamers to complain about graphics. Especially when whats holding it back is 6yr old console hardware.
Annoys the shit outta me too and Im not even a PC gamer. We really need new hardware.
WanderingWind said:Morrowind had a great art direction, but not top-tier graphics for its time.
Games developed with the PC as a lead platform will undoubtedly look better on PC. Games developed on the 360 first will, as a rule, not look as good. Bethesda's getting most of their money from consoles, so I can see the reasoning behind it. The Master Race ban bitch all they want, but from a purely economical standpoint it makes little sense to spend extra development time on creating high-res textures and everything for the PC-version, unless they decide to delay it by another six months. And who would be the first to come bitching about that? Call me an apologist, but you can't deny there's some reasoning behind it.bengraven said:It's going to be one-sided though. It will be Dennis in the corner, hovering over a blood splattered corpse, entrails dangling from his jaws.
The kid is giving the most apologistic attitudes I've seen in a long time and this is coming from a Bethesda apologist.
Exactly. What's the lead sku? End of story.Blue Ninja said:Games developed with the PC as a lead platform will undoubtedly look better on PC. Games developed on the 360 first will, as a rule, not look as good. Bethesda's getting most of their money from consoles, so I can see the reasoning behind it. The Master Race ban bitch all they want, but from a purely economical standpoint it makes little sense to spend extra development time on creating high-res textures and everything for the PC-version, unless they decide to delay it by another six months. And who would be the first to come bitching about that? Call me an apologist, but you can't deny there's some reason behind it.
And now I got myself involved anyways, dammit.
GameTrailer's live demo is right after the Microsoft Press Briefing, at 7pm GMT. IGN's is on Wednesday, at 12:40pm PST (08:40pm GMT)wit3tyg3r said:Okay, just a little deviation from this battle, G4TV has announced their E3 live coverage schedule. Todd Howard will be doing a live demo on G4TV on Tuesday at 4:00pm EST. I think Gametrailers is doing it on Monday (but I don't know what time) and, as previously mentioned somewhere in this thread, IGN will be doing it on Wednesday at.....12:45pm PST....I think.
How many games are sub-720p and not even 30fps?TheExorzist said:Why bother? Todays graphics don't need to be surpased anymore. A couple of developers have already stated that this is the first generation in VG-history where they aren't limited by hardware anymore to realize their ideas.
bengraven said:That's what fan-made texture packs are for.
Corky said:Yeeeah I'm gonna go ahead and say that the hard work of regular people contributing free mods should be a bonus rather than a necessity for any AAA game.
subversus said:I definitely dig more realistic approach. The guy looks good, like somebody from The Witcher universe.
bengraven said:I'm not giving the developers an out. I just don't really care about graphics anymore. I mean...I play Minecraft.