hamchan said:With the way Microsoft is heading with Kinect and Nintendo with WiiU, I predict the jump from PS3 to PS4 probably will be smaller than previous generational jumps but Sony will still have the strongest system tech wise compared to the other two.
mrfolego said:You mean strongest potential right
Let's play Tetra Master and Triple Triad. I heard some dude made the Final Fantasy card games into standalone PC games.Tron 2.0 said:Has a terrible frame rate. Couldn't get into it.
Absolutely. In the same manner than PS2 was technically more proficient than Xbox and Gamecube. lolhamchan said:With the way Microsoft is heading with Kinect and Nintendo with WiiU, I predict the jump from PS3 to PS4 probably will be smaller than previous generational jumps but Sony will still have the strongest system tech wise compared to the other two.
Fredescu said:Number of active Steam accounts isn't a bad start, and at 30 million it would put it at last place.
Vita is not some marvel of technology. Its straight up Cell phone technology. Vita is the perfect example of The new Sony based on the last financial meeting. No more exotic expensive stuff. Off the shelf components to save doughMuseManMike said:I don't think this is true. I think Sony will stick with pushing new technologies. I say this due to the specs of the Vita. The company's general philosophy seems to be intact.
I agree that both of the next gen consoles will have an incredibly emphasis on social media and the casual gaming audience. Facebook/Twitter integration standard and so forth. But, I like to think Sony will stick up for the core more than Microsoft and their console would reflect that.
I do see Sony trying to be profitable on each console sold very early on. Maybe 1 year of losses at the most. So the jump may not be to the 32 SPU beast people want.
You don't have to laugh at my jokehamchan said:Yes.
Right. But it's still a powerful piece of tech in comparison with what's available on the portable market today. If Sony completely abandoned the emphasis on powerful devices, I don't think the specs would be what they are.antonz said:Vita is not some marvel of technology. Its straight up Cell phone technology. Vita is the perfect example of The new Sony based on the last financial meeting. No more exotic expensive stuff. Off the shelf components to save dough
pje122 said:What's wrong with that girl's face...?
Gaborn said:LOL... no.
People are really ignoring history. Why is everyone acting like Sony is some bleeding edge technololgical giant? Look at the PS2, it was by FAR the weakest system. Playstation? Weaker than the N64 (though of course it used a superior medium for it's games).
JaseC said:This was briefly discussed in the earlier thread. Given how far away the PS4 must be (18 months at least), I doubt he knows much if anything about it at all.
Kevin said:Did somebody ring?
http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/50500_332561550002_3894078_n.jpg[/img]
Gaborn said:LOL... no.
People are really ignoring history. Why is everyone acting like Sony is some bleeding edge technololgical giant? Look at the PS2, it was by FAR the weakest system. Playstation? Weaker than the N64 (though of course it used a superior medium for it's games).
AAK said:Damn, PS4 might possibly come before TLG and Vesus13!
As impressive as the Vita is, its not exactly bleeding edge or anything. Off the shelf parts based on like 2009 architecture I believe? If anything its a return to the smart Sony who had hardware with a good balance of power vs. affordability. Not overpriced monstrosities that were stuffed with exotic hardware.MuseManMike said:I don't think this is true. I think Sony will stick with pushing new technologies. I say this due to the specs of the Vita. The company's general philosophy seems to be intact.
The Vita is like the opposite of Krazy Kens design philosophy.okenny said:So if this comes to past, can we assume that Crazy Ken's legacy is dead? I thought the PS Vita suggested that his spirit still lives on.
lherre said:Ps2 and psx were the strongest systems out when they come out to the market ... (well psx and saturn not too much, but ps2 is more powerful than DC). Remember than N64, xbox or gc came later.
Gaborn said:LOL... no.
People are really ignoring history. Why is everyone acting like Sony is some bleeding edge technololgical giant? Look at the PS2, it was by FAR the weakest system. Playstation? Weaker than the N64 (though of course it used a superior medium for it's games).
The PS3 and 360 were both gigantic leaps technology, and both very much in line with bleeding edge technology - and frankly I don't think that lends itself to another similar leap. When the PS3 especially was "future-proofed" (remember that?) it all but guaranteed either an unrealistically long life cycle or it guaranteed a considerably smaller technical leap. That just is the way it works to keep development costs for games halfway reasonable.
amstradcpc said:If true Microsoft will get my money this time.
Momo said:The Vita is like the opposite of Krazy Kens design philosophy.
Also How cool would it be to see Krazy Ken go to Sega to do Kombat against Sony by launching Dreamkast II 4D Ken style.