Whats bugging me is that if "ancient" Klingons had starships, how come they didn't take over the whole quadrant way back then?
Also DS9 stated that Klingons did not have warp drives until sometime after 1947.
Who said the ancient Klingons had warp? Also I dont remember that from DS9, what ep?
Source: http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Little_Green_Men_(episode)Based on Quark's line "Once we get things in order here, we'll contact the Ferengi homeworld and sell them our ship. The Ferengi will have warp drive technology centuries before Humans or Klingons or even the Vulcans.", it is established that Qo'noS and Vulcan had not yet become warp-capable by 1947. However, in Star Trek: First Contact it was established that Humans would achieve warp drive in only another 116 years from 1947, so not exactly "centuries" later. It was also established in ENT: "Carbon Creek" that Vulcans had warp-capable ships only ten years later. Moreover, it has been established in several episodes that Vulcans and Klingons possessed interstellar travel capability long before 1947. Based on ENT: "The Andorian Incident", the first known instance of Vulcan interstellar travel was around 850 BC, when the Vulcan P'Jem monastery was built outside the Vulcan system. According to TNG: "Rightful Heir", the Klingon monastery in the star system with the planet Boreth was built shortly after the death of Kahless. According to the episode VOY: "Day of Honor", Kahless lived in the 9th century. It has however not been established what propulsion technology was used for interstellar travel on these early voyages. The fact that Quark was inaccurate with his "centuries" statement might however indicate he was also inaccurate about the fact that Vulcans and Klingons were not yet warp-capable; he would presumably know approximately when his people acquired warp drive, but might know little about Klingon history. Nevertheless, the only clear suggestion in canon that Quark is wrong lies in Soval's statement in "The Forge" that "it took my people nearly 1,500 years to rebuild our world and travel to the stars. You Humans did the same in less than a century"; since Humans didn't "travel to the stars" until they invented warp drive, if Vulcans "did the same" in 1,500 years from the time of Surak, that would mean they developed warp drive in the mid-19th century.
I'm assuming they must have warp capability to be any sort of threat to the Federation.
The episode was "Little Green Men", I actually believe I am now mistaken as in doing more research I have discovered that whole part of the cannon is a clusterfuck:
Source: http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Little_Green_Men_(episode)
I think we can give the Discovery writers some leeway with this.
I'd be okay with that.
Most Star Trek enthusiasts would not be.
I'm assuming they must have warp capability to be any sort of threat to the Federation.
The episode was "Little Green Men", I actually believe I am now mistaken as in doing more research I have discovered that whole part of the cannon is a clusterfuck:
Source: http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Little_Green_Men_(episode)
I think we can give the Discovery writers some leeway with this.
Should we do a thread for the SDCC panel tonight? Starts in like 1.5 hours, I think. Yea or nay? I'm... leaning no? Star Trek isn't exactly GAF_XXX_HAWT but it's far from tiny here too. So maybe...? I'm so indecisive.
I'll make the OP if so; I've got some time to kill to do the research 'til then.
Lorca is the captain of the Discovery, no?
Kurtzman: "We're aware Spock's stepsister isn't canon. Be patient with us."
Does he know anything about Star Trek fans?
Besides
video not available nowHoly shit that all looked god damned epic. I don't think it's possible to be more hyped then I am. Looked like a movie!
The more I see of Discovery, the more I'm convinced it could be right up there with TNG as my top Trek.
Amazing casting and vision IMO.
Is the Klingon-Federation War that will be depicted in Discovery already canon?
Is the Klingon-Federation War that will be depicted in Discovery already canon?
I don't think the exact events have ever been detailed. This should however be during a period of time where things between the Federation and Klingons are super tense. I could be remembering wrong but I think it's a case where both sides were taking actions against each other on different levels and politicians were working overtime to keep things under control. There would be battles over certain areas, blockades, invading of territory, etc. No all out war between the sides (compared to something like the Fed/Romulan War or war with the Dominion, etc) but on the verge of it. No fleet vs fleet battles but more one ship vs two, etc. So the conflict in Discovery could fit in that time period without much trouble I think.
Wired said:Discovery will focus on a callow commander (Sonequa Martin-Green) rather than a sophisticated captain, though we're still getting the latter, too, played by the great Michelle Yeoh. Lantern-jawed cis-het white men have been rightly cleared off the bridge in favor of a team that more accurately reflects the galaxy (and Gene Roddenberry's vision). New ship, new crew, new strange new worlds, new life, new civilizations. Beam me up.
https://www.wired.com/2017/05/star-trek-discovery/
Well, thats certainly an opinion.
I wonder how much these critics know anything about this show, given that we know the actual captain is Jason Isaacs, the ship shown in the trailers is NOT the USS Discovery but the USS Shenzou, and most likely Michelle Yeoh dies in the pilot.