why are you still not banned?Emotep said:It is funny because in order to enjoy Phoenix Wright, you need to be able to read. Is that too hard for Bungie game players?
why are you still not banned?Emotep said:It is funny because in order to enjoy Phoenix Wright, you need to be able to read. Is that too hard for Bungie game players?
open_mouth_ said:In retrospect, I'm sure Sony would do *alot* of things differently if they could. Some things that might've been different:
1) PSP delayed a tad to include touch screen and built to be sold at a starting price of $199. Games released on memory stick type storage (cheaper) and every accessory sold separately to keep costs low (memory stick, case, etc.)
2) One version of PS3 only, with no built-in HD @ ~$399. Blu-Ray still built-in, but streamlined to only have 1 memory slot (which would require anyone who wanted to save anything to buy a $50 memory "drive" sata at 2 Gigs to start off). Only component out to start, 720p/1080i support for movies and games. HDMI version could've been offered later when the system's costs were cut (65nm, etc.). That system would've sold like gangbusters worldwide and it would've been cheaper to make and much easier to sell.
3) six-axis is fine, but rumble should've been settled prior to ps3 launch.
Emotep said:It is funny because in order to enjoy Phoenix Wright, you need to be able to read. Is that too hard for Bungie game players?
A Link to the Snitch said:I guess that's why YOU can't play it
intentionally bad insult
open_mouth_ said:OK, the PS2 didn't have a built-in HD like the Xbox and it absolutely dominated last-gen, anyway. Every PS2 owner had to buy a memory card eventually so they didn't think, "OK, so the PS2 is $299 plus $40 for a memory card, making it $340 in reality"... It's the initial price that people think about and that's what's important. For Sony, every single PS3 owner would *have* to have at least 2 gigs in their system to save games or download content so that'd be a virtual 100% attach rate, resulting in a high level of developer support regardless. Selling the memory or HD separate gives users the option of going for less space (2 gigs) or more (up to 200 gigs, for example) while it allows Sony to competitively price the console for maximum impact.
The reason you see more $599 versions is probably because A) Sony loses less on those units and B) there's more demand for those units. The 360 is seen as "$399" and the PS3 would've been seen as $399 as well and it would've wiped the floor with the 360 worldwide at that price and it would've probably retained 75% or more of its marketshare.
sillymonkey321 said:WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Maybe you hate western games? All of them. But then again...if you bought an Xbox 360 to play....Xbox games....why didn't you just buy a much much much cheaper Xbox in the first place....and if you wanted to the 360....why did you sell it before most of the AAA projects come out......./mindboggled.
The times are changing, old dude.open_mouth_ said:OK, the PS2 didn't have a built-in HD like the Xbox and it absolutely dominated last-gen, anyway. Every PS2 owner had to buy a memory card eventually so they didn't think, "OK, so the PS2 is $299 plus $40 for a memory card, making it $340 in reality"... It's the initial price that people think about and that's what's important. For Sony, every single PS3 owner would *have* to have at least 2 gigs in their system to save games or download content so that'd be a virtual 100% attach rate, resulting in a high level of developer support regardless. Selling the memory or HD separate gives users the option of going for less space (2 gigs) or more (up to 200 gigs, for example) while it allows Sony to competitively price the console for maximum impact.
The reason you see more $599 versions is probably because A) Sony loses less on those units and B) there's more demand for those units. The 360 is seen as "$399" and the PS3 would've been seen as $399 as well and it would've wiped the floor with the 360 worldwide at that price and it would've probably retained 75% or more of its marketshare.
Mr. Ihara has set up a task force, based in the U.S., to develop products that will allow users to download content from the Internet onto Sony products like the Walkman and PlayStation. He also created a center in Tokyo to develop software.
One early effort: a module for TVs that allows users to watch video from the Internet using a remote control. It uses some of the same software as the PlayStation 3 console.
The Sphinx said:I don't know how effective Stringer can be as head of Sony because of the cultural problems (both business culture and national culture)... But he's certainly spot-on when he argues that Sony needs to improve their software-hardware integration.
Pope Benedict XVI said:Go easy on emotep; brain-rotting is a very real issue when you have one made of pudding. Poor guy.
Emotep said:Nope, I enjoy Phoenix Wright for at least 3 hours every day.
Stinkles said:HEY MODS:
I have an awesome story from the WSJ - is it OK to post it as a thread? It's well researched piece about PS3 and Stringer and will cause a meltdown.
LJ11 said:When interviewed on CNBC last week about Blu-Ray, where he proclaimed victory over HD-DVD, he kept on harping on DRM and the security the format offers movie studios. Didn't mention a single thing about how their format is superior (not arguing if it is or isn't), it was all about DRM.
Woo-Fu said:Makes sense. He is selling it to the studios(who want DRM) and the masses(who don't care), not to geeks.
Emotep said:They need to fire Stringer and hire someone from Japan.
His first mistake was listening to the Americans.
Y2Kevbug11 said:So what can Stringer do really? The article makes him sound rather helpless. If Stringer can't be allowed to just go in and rip out the guts, he's pretty ineffectual.
drohne said:i think this is the first information we've seen as to why kutaragi was demoted -- or promoted out of the way, as the case may be. sounds as if it was primarily a clash of styles and personalities, though obviously sony can't be happy with the losses ps3 has sustained. interesting stuff.
Software talk
ThirdEye said:The times are changing, old dude.
LJ11 said:No it doesn't, because the interviewer asked him why Sony's format was better/superior to HD-DVD. He said security. They both use the same security. I know Blu-Ray offers an extra layer of security, however no one is using it at the moment. Stringer is obsessed about DRM, always has always will.
open_mouth_ said:2) One version of PS3 only, with no built-in HD @ ~$399. Blu-Ray still built-in, but streamlined to only have 1 memory slot (which would require anyone who wanted to save anything to buy a $50 memory "drive" sata at 2 Gigs to start off). Only component out to start, 720p/1080i support for movies and games. HDMI version could've been offered later when the system's costs were cut (65nm, etc.). That system would've sold like gangbusters worldwide and it would've been cheaper to make and much easier to sell.
Quoted for truth. Considering Sony, Who is traditionally known for excellent hardware and sub-par software, is actually making a multitasking, flexable software OS!Zen said:Say what will you about PSN missing X feature of Xbox live etc etc, but the effort put into their software integration (which really began with the PSP) ahs really been fantastic. I've been really impressed by how quickly they've been updating, adding functionality etc. I don't think they get enough credit for the XMB related work they've done, and they're still being very serious about it moving forward.
Woo-Fu said:...which makes perfect sense. The studios want security, Blu-Ray offers another layer of security if they want to use it.
You're just backing up my point. Thanks, btw.
Brimstone said:I'd love to read a well researched article comparing the rise of Samsung and the decline of Sony.
Woo-Fu said:...which makes perfect sense. The studios want security, Blu-Ray offers another layer of security if they want to use it.
You're just backing up my point. Thanks, btw.
Brimstone said:Regarding Blu-Ray, I'm pretty sure why we have a format war is a direct result of Kutaragi. He didn't want to negotiate with Toshiba. I got the impression Kutaragi really has burned a lot of bridges with Toshiba and Sony execs.
jaundicejuice said:I don't really know much about the history of the company, so the article was a pretty interesting read. It's just bizarre to read that a major, multi-national corporation is internally divided up into fiefdoms that are seemingly answerable to no one but themselves. Kutaragi was able to just do whatever he wanted with the Playstation 3? Go over-budget on the overall hardware or slash the price of the hardware in specific region and there was no one higher up to gainsay him? All Stringer could do was just go along with KK's descions until he ousted him?
LJ11 said:Dude, Blu-ray already has every large studio but one. Stringer never mentioned that. That's a talking point, not DRM.
The pricecut in Japan was absolutely necessary, this is evident in the weekly sales charts.jaundicejuice said:I don't really know much about the history of the company, so the article was a pretty interesting read. It's just bizarre to read that a major, multi-national corporation is internally divided up into fiefdoms that are seemingly answerable to no one but themselves. Kutaragi was able to just do whatever he wanted with the Playstation 3? Go over-budget on the overall hardware or slash the price of the hardware in specific region and there was no one higher up to gainsay him? All Stringer could do was just go along with KK's descions until he ousted him?
spwolf said:eh, BD got every large studio because of better DRM. Fox especially moved to BD-only because od BD-J, and HD-DVD having weak protection.
If Fox has not done that, who knows what would be the outcome of the war.
DRM is not some big bad monster in disc movie business though, unlike with online music, there is not "much" wrong with DRM in movies, as you can still play it wherever you want to play it, unlike with DRM-music sold online.
ThirdEye said:The pricecut in Japan was absolutely necessary, this is evident in the weekly sales charts.
theBishop said:Its pretty damn obvious what they should be doing:
Let the Japanese handle the hardware engineering.
Let the Americans handle the software.
I think American programmers would be thrilled with that arrangement (i know i would be), and its a matter of getting the Japanese engineers on board. If the iPod is an example of software innovation leading hardware, then its clear my suggestion is the model Sony needs to adopt.
It also sounds like Stringer really needs to get loyal people in leadership positions. If the department heads aren't talking to him, that's a nightmare of a problem.
spwolf said:which would be published in 2004, as Sony is now back and looking strong. Finally posting big profits in Cell phones, TV's are again the best sold TV's in the world and Sony has strongest movie business for two years in the row.
Last quarter Sony had 1.3 billion in profits, despite huge PS3 development and startup costs...
ghostlyjoe said:So relegating the respective departments to different continents is supposed to make for more integrated hardware and software? Maybe I'm misreading this. Could you explain?