Melfice7
Member
This'll be my first time going into TLOU.....seriously even with the small amount of media I've seen. I know absolutely nothing about this game.
I envy you
This'll be my first time going into TLOU.....seriously even with the small amount of media I've seen. I know absolutely nothing about this game.
From what I can tell, and the reason the PS3 version looks so blurry, is they upscaled the PS3 version to 1080, recorded it next to the remaster version, and then downscaled the result video to 720p. What I want to see is a 1080p video with the 720p upscaled. You guys can post 720p screens all you want, but as soon as you fullscreen that 720p screenshot and zoom it so that it fills a 1080p screen you get comparable levels of blur. Compare a zoomed 720p shot to a native 1080p shot for the best comparison.
Its worth $60, dont act like it doesnt
GTA V will be $60 also
The Last of Us: Remastered is worth $60, because it comes with the DLC that just came out 4 months ago, too.
I specifically didn't play it back then, because I was anticipating this Remaster.
Still pricey I feel, considering it's just the same game with some performance enhancements.
The PS3 version of The Last of Us is still $40 MSRP at retail, plus you're getting the $15 DLC. The game has long sales legs due to the GOTY press.
Still pricey I feel, considering it's just the same game with some performance enhancements.
You're a savvy consumer, but a terrible businessman.It should be less expensive than the originals, it's not a new game like those are, its a remaster. $40 for the lot would be a lot fairer IMO
It should be less expensive than the originals, it's not a new game like those are, its a remaster. $40 for the lot would be a lot fairer IMO
Huge difference, not even considering the doubled (and then some) framerate. Absolutely can't wait.
It's obvious that something was wrong with Gamespot's capture of the PS3 version, though. 720p looks like shit, but it doesn't look that much like shit. Still, the numbers don't lie and 1080p is a massive pixel increase from 720p, so it will look much better than what I played last year.
I'm hoping they get some good AA in the Remaster, as well. The PS3 game used AA when it felt like it. They just blurred the edges of characters in the pre-rendered cutscenes.
1080p/60fps with some good AA makes me warm inside.
Huge difference, not even considering the doubled (and then some) framerate. Absolutely can't wait.
It's obvious that something was wrong with Gamespot's capture of the PS3 version, though. 720p looks like shit, but it doesn't look that much like shit. Still, the numbers don't lie and 1080p is a massive pixel increase from 720p, so it will look much better than what I played last year.
I'm hoping they get some good AA in the Remaster, as well. The PS3 game used AA when it felt like it. They just blurred the edges of characters in the pre-rendered cutscenes.
1080p/60fps with some good AA makes me warm inside.
Well its a good thing Sony didn't hire you to decide their pricing. If the original costs $40, what makes you think it would be a good idea to price an upgraded version with all DLC at the same exact price?
Because a lot of people buying it will have already spent money buying the original. And it's not like Halo Anniversary where they remade the entire game, its exactly the same game with higher framerate and resolution, why do they charge so much for such little work compared to making another game? to me the price is too high.
Because a lot of people buying it will have already spent money buying the original. And it's not like Halo Anniversary where they remade the entire game, its exactly the same game with higher framerate and resolution, why do they charge so much for such little work compared to making another game? to me the price is too high.
I'm sure it will look amazing on Ps4, but that video is bullshit. You can say I'm remembering wrong if you want, but it was only a year ago. The game was NOT that blurry.
Do you feel that people are being misled, or that the choice some will make buying it at full-price is foolish? One of those is a rational outward criticism, the other is simply a reaction to individual agency.
Edit: What I would agree with though, is with the fact that ND should offer an upgrade for $15 or $20 but forcing you to use the PS3 disc in order to play.
I'm sure it will look amazing on Ps4, but that video is bullshit. You can say I'm remembering wrong if you want, but it was only a year ago. The game was NOT that blurry.
Its like someone wiped the windows or something and now you can see clearly. Fucking great.
The covers sound better than the originals
There's definitely something wrong with GameSpot's footage on the PS3 side. I still have footage of the first two hours captured on my computer (and my capture wasn't the greatest either, but still better than that). Here's a side by side of my capture versus theirs (both are PS3).
Gamespot:
Mine (PS3):
You can see theirs is more blurrier and washed out than it should be especially on Ellie's face (you can't see her freckles), forearm, wrist etc. The PS4 version will look better either way, but this isn't a good comparison since their PS3 footage is fucked up.
Not even close.
There's definitely something wrong with GameSpot's footage on the PS3 side. I still have footage of the first two hours captured on my computer (and my capture wasn't the greatest either, but still better than that). Here's a side by side of my capture versus theirs (both are PS3).
Gamespot:
Mine (PS3):
You can see theirs is more blurrier and washed out than it should be especially on Ellie's face (you can't see her freckles), forearm, wrist etc. The PS4 version will look better either way, but this isn't a good comparison since their PS3 footage is fucked up.
GTAV looks like a bigger upgrade visually and TLOU looks like a rushed remaster judging by this video.
I was thinking the same thing, the GTAV remaster looks like a lot of work went into it, this just looks like a resolution and texture boost :/