IISANDERII
Member
Pre-order definitively cancelled.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Tomb Raider Definitive Edition (PS4/XB1) is 30 FPS
- Thread starter Nirolak
- Start date
shinobi602
Member
Here we go again.
Zombie James
Banned
30fps on both? How?
Read the comments in here from PC gamers about how this game runs one their rigs with TressFX on. It's a complete hog that hasn't been optimized in the slightest.
Mr. Poolman
Member
- This game still embodies all the awful 30FPS on consoles it did before!
- But she's got a new hair!
- But she's got a new hair!
CosmicGroinPull
Member
As expected. Still getting this.
Interfectum
Member
I played mine on 1200p, 60 fps, ultra settings on a PC I built in 2011 for $900. This gen... lol
BlazeBreak
Member
Yeah, like everyone's saying, go right ahead with the "definitive" jokes, but it was silly to expect the game to be 1080p and 60fps.
I have a 4gb GTX 770 and an i7-4770, and Tomb Raider is the only game I've played so far that I can't simply crank up to the maximum possible settings while still having it run at 60fps. Completely maxed out, I benchmark at like 32fps with dips toward 20. With SSAA toned down to 2x instead of 4x, I run it at 50-something fps.
I have a 4gb GTX 770 and an i7-4770, and Tomb Raider is the only game I've played so far that I can't simply crank up to the maximum possible settings while still having it run at 60fps. Completely maxed out, I benchmark at like 32fps with dips toward 20. With SSAA toned down to 2x instead of 4x, I run it at 50-something fps.
Horsemama1956
Member
On a gimpy 7870? No.
On my overclocked 7870(1175/1350) at 2560x1440 I was only getting about 30 fps with TressFX enabled on Ultra. This game doesn't feel nearly as nice at 30 fps either. An option to disable TressFX and get 60 fps should have been included.
I only enabled TressFX to see it, but the performance impact wasn't worth it at all.
TGO
Hype Train conductor. Works harder than it steams.
It is, most people can't tell the difference so why make the effort, beat em ups, racers etc are different because some especially fighters are dependent on frames, but a 3rd person adventure game? I don't think anybody cares as long as its stable....well some care
Finaika
Member
Did you turn on TressFX?
BlazeBreak
Member
Are you just used to saying "Ultra" or do you literally mean Tomb Raider's "Ultra" preset?
Because "Ultra" has TressFX turned off. ("Ultimate" has TressFX turned on, but even then still isn't maxed. There's one other setting - I think shadows - that's "normal" on Ultra/Ultimate that you can increase to high)awesomebro
Member
I don't get the obsession with 60fps..
LowEndTorque
Member
Cool. I'll download it when it's a PS+ freebie.
First year cross-gen ports are always the best indicator of the max performance of a new console, yep.
Btw, you played the last gen version.
K
kittens
Unconfirmed Member
30 First Person Shooter, wow, as if COD hasn't killed this industry enough, ugh
Thanks a lot, iwata
Thanks a lot, iwata
Yoshichan
And they made him a Lord of Cinder. Not for virtue, but for might. Such is a lord, I suppose. But here I ask. Do we have a sodding chance?
I'm dying :lol
speculawyer
Member
I will buy this game again. But not until the price drops by a large amount.
Portugeezer
Member
It's literally a $60 graphics mod.
Shaqiri1287
Banned
LMAO at 30 FPS.
TGO
Hype Train conductor. Works harder than it steams.
As a Virtual Fighter and Street Fighter nut, I agree but for this type of game? its not needed a solid 30 is more then fine, people are just making something out of nothing, and we all know why.
Boom!
Pathetic as usual.
60fps is twice as smooth as 30fps, it's that simple.
zenosparadox
Member
If they can at least prevent drops below 30fps, that would be nice...
I got it for free and enjoy it at 60fps, 1440p. I don't see why people are surprised next gen consoles can't handle full FPS.
The only time frames seem to matter is twitch shooting with no hit scan and fighting games. Solid framerate 24 or 30 is just fine for 99% of games.
Revolutionary
Member
As long as it's a genuinely solid 30fps, then I'm okay with this. The PS3 version was probably an average of 20.
Edit: I also played it on PC at launch which had poor Nvidia performance, which gave me an average in the 40's with everything maxed out at 1080.
Edit: I also played it on PC at launch which had poor Nvidia performance, which gave me an average in the 40's with everything maxed out at 1080.
Well let me explain it to you then.
60 fps looks and feels better than 30 fps.
Last gen was the "HD gen" with some games at 1080p and some games at 60 fps. After 8 years of that everyone was expecting all games at 1080p and most at 60 fps.
This particular game is a last gen game released with a few changes, yet they still can't get 60 fps. This is upsetting.
FonkyByNature
Member
I was never going to buy that for 60$. I payed 20$ for the PS3 version with PS+.
I would have considered the game for 40$ or less but at 60$ ? lol, no offense to the developers but it's ridiculous and they know it. But hey, devs don't decide at which price to sell that definitive version.
And btw definitive ? lol what a load of crap that is !
I would have considered the game for 40$ or less but at 60$ ? lol, no offense to the developers but it's ridiculous and they know it. But hey, devs don't decide at which price to sell that definitive version.
And btw definitive ? lol what a load of crap that is !
AstroNut325
Member
The other TRE thread had a poster who said he/she would pay $1 per frame. I remember I agreed to that. So... $30 is my price of admission. Not a penny more.
E thread had a poster who said he/she would pay $1 per frame. I remember I agreed to that. So... $30 is my price of admission. Not a penny more.PlumCantaloupe
Member
OffT: Oh geezus that is my son. That little monster.
OnT: Are we still believing these two consoles to be the leap the PS3 and Xbox360 were at launch?
KZSF impressed me more than any of the PS3/360 titles did at launch.
You could make the argument that no game "needs" 60 fps, or 30 for that matter. Games just feel better to play at higher framerates no matter what genre. I enjoyed my time with this game much more when I disabled TressFX and played at 60 than when I had it enabled and limited my fps to 30.
Maybe, but if the power was readily available, I am sure they would use it.
I wasn't trying to start something, but I really find it disgusting by Microsoft and Sony that they settled on consoles that can't hit basically the median TV/monitor spec on a game that came out for last gen. What does that mean later on in the cycle when PCs are 3-5x more powerful than they are now?
Obviously, they chose to prioritize breaking even on their consoles in year one rather than pushing the envelope on technology. I just hope that PC gaming can keep some of the technology moving forward in their absence.