You can't seriously be asking yourself that question....can you? :\Sharp said:Damn, I wish this were coming to PC or something. I would pick it up as a standalone... don't want to have to pay $400 just to play this.
I had something here to the same effect about Buckethead, but I deleted it because it wasn't really a good idea.jett said:It looks mediocre and completely disrespectful of the original. I'd rather play the SNES remake, which is totally awesome.
p.s. buying this means you support Ubishit's rape of the franchise.
jett said:It looks mediocre and completely disrespectful of the original. I'd rather play the SNES remake, which is totally awesome.
p.s. buying this means you support Ubishit's rape of the franchise.
jett said:It looks mediocre and completely disrespectful of the original. I'd rather play the SNES remake, which is totally awesome.
p.s. buying this means you support Ubishit's rape of the franchise.
Sharp said:Damn, I wish this were coming to PC or something. I would pick it up as a standalone... don't want to have to pay $400 just to play this.
a Master Ninja said:Wow...
Rlan said:I'm glad some mobile developers like Gameloft are finaly coming around to the console side of things. I mean, look at POP Mobile:
They've done stuff like the two Asphault Urban GT games on the DS too [which wern't all that fun, but at least design fairly well]
No, I don't really want to pirate it. I want to give Ubisoft lots of money for doing this. But I've realized that, with the amount of time I spend gaming, a 360 would probably not be cost effective.Ranger X said:You buy a console for more than one game you know.
I can't help myself but to think it's such a derogative way to look at a console price.
I suppose that in fact you want to pirate the game right?
Sharp said:No, I don't really want to pirate it. I want to give Ubisoft lots of money for doing this. But I've realized that, with the amount of time I spend gaming, a 360 would probably not be cost effective.
gketter said:heh nobody seems to live up to their title more than jett
:lol :lol :lol :loljett said:It looks mediocre and completely disrespectful of the original. I'd rather play the SNES remake, which is totally awesome.
p.s. buying this means you support Ubishit's rape of the franchise.
You young whipper-snappers with your IBM PCs.Metalmurphy said:No, thats the second one. The first one is like this:
SO AWESOME.speculawyer said:You young whipper-snappers with your IBM PCs.
The Apple ][ version is the true original!
Word. I picked this shit up the first day my local bookstore/software store got it. Apple ][ version, biatches. And I really like the way this new version looks. Yeah, it's busier and high-octanified (is that a word?)...but it looks fun.speculawyer said:You young whipper-snappers with your IBM PCs.
The Apple ][ version is the true original!
Quoted.... FOR the MOTHER F*CKING TRUTH!!!pswii60 said:WOW OMFG!
This is how retro titles SHOULD be made.
jett said:It looks mediocre and completely disrespectful of the original. I'd rather play the SNES remake, which is totally awesome.
p.s. buying this means you support Ubishit's rape of the franchise.
I love how you can pick out the individual pixels in such a small screenshot.speculawyer said:You young whipper-snappers with your IBM PCs.
The Apple ][ version is the true original!
:lolBenjaminBirdie said:Is it still Rolling Thunder or are the crops just on fire at this point?
jett said:It looks mediocre and completely disrespectful of the original. I'd rather play the SNES remake, which is totally awesome.
p.s. buying this means you support Ubishit's rape of the franchise.
jett said:It looks mediocre and completely disrespectful of the original. I'd rather play the SNES remake, which is totally awesome.
p.s. buying this means you support Ubishit's rape of the franchise.
I agree. New Sonic games should look nice, and have old 2d gameplay.pswii60 said:THIS IS HOW SONIC SHOULD BE DONE