But they're not, they 60 quid because that's all that's on the disc, maps
If there's no Single Player or even Co op story then they are shipping a Disc with maps for us to entertain ourselves with for 60 quid
Instead of 60 quid worth of entertainment and some mp maps as an extra.
You're smarter than this GAF. Why on earth did you even expect it to have a single player if they never showed or even talked about it? I thought it was pretty clear this was another Titenfall/Evolve kinda deal.
Why can't MP be entertainment too? Why is MP the 'extra' in a series with prolific MP success as Rainbow Six????????
Agreed.At the end of the day, you are going to buy the product or not, but you can't form an argument based on subjective values.
people on GAF don't get this. I'm positive that 90% of this forum thinks games are made by typing shit in notepad.It's an arbitrary comparison.
One person may derive more enjoyment from the multiplayer and not value the single player at all.
One person may value single player content more and not see value in the game as the result of a lack of single player content. Both are perfectly fine with their opinions
To make the point even more irrelevant, a studio is given a budget at the start of development. They can split that budget in half and devote their resources to both single player and multiplayer modes, or just focus all of their budget on multiplayer.
Personally, I would prefer if developers for these popular multiplayer games such as Call.of Duty, Battlefield, etc would devote all of their resources to multiplayer rather than put out a subpar single player. Obviously others would disagreed but ultimately it's up to focus groups to determine where the budget goes.
At the end of the day, you are going to buy the product or not, but you can't form an argument based on subjective values.
Yeah. Like counter strike. And rocket league. League of legends. Dota.... You get the point. Mp only does not = fail.
However spending millions on making a sp that most of the fan base won't care about and most people will just crap on if it's not amazing is a fail.
Plus r6 is a pretty niche title and spending crazy amounts on a sp and not making enough back is a good way for the franchise to never make a good come back.
Agreed.
To me MP is really just a bonus in games. Splatoon is the first MP-focused game I played in a long time, and it even has SP.
The reason is mostly because people like me don't have the time to put in and "get good" because of life.
people on GAF don't get this. I'm positive that 90% of this forum thinks games are made by typing shit in notepad.
Those are either f2p or cost less than 20 bucks, good comparison.
I will say this...
At least put some resources into making Terrorist Hunt 60 fps lol.
Don't know if they're aiming for that in the final build, but jeez it sucks going from 60fps to 30.
It's not 60fps. Wow, not really going for it Ubisoft.
So that's the only two things a MP only game can be priced at?Those are either f2p or cost less than 20 bucks, good comparison.
It's going to bomb horrifically.
Have any PC shooters survived outside of Steam? edit. Never mind this will be sold on Steam, but who knows if the community will stick to it.It's going to bomb horrifically.
Because it doesn't have a mode that was never announced, nor was led to believe was in?
The single-player is really about the players story, and the players impact on the Rainbow Six universe, continues Witts. Rainbow Six Siege is bringing us back to the scenario-based missions from previous Rainbow titles. Each scenario is designed with single-player in mind, though all of them can be played in co-op. As with the Hostage Rescue mode revealed at E3 last year, theres no respawning; if you go down once, youre down for good.
So that's the only two things a MP only game can be priced at?
So that's the only two things a MP only game can be priced at?
Because it doesn't have a mode that was never announced, nor was led to believe was in?
I have no interest in this game but find the discussion interesting. If I found this very enjoyable to play then yes I would pay $60 for it.Well does it have so much more content than these games or why is it worth 60$ to you?
Seems like a very narrow view of games and hypocritical.Yes, imo.
It's going to bomb horrifically.
Are they not referring to Terrohunt in this? Having scenarios designed for single and multiplayer = / = a single player campaign.